This paper investigates to what extent the grammatical class(es) of a word can be predicted on the basis of phonological and prosodic information only. We report on several experiments with an artificial learning system which has to assign English word forms to their appropriate grammatical class, using various types of phonological and prosodic information. First of all, we examine several phonological cues which were claimed by Kelly (1996) to be particularly good for distinguishing English nouns from verbs. Our results indicate that these cues are indeed partially predictive for the problem at hand and reveal that a combination of cues yields significantly better results than those obtained for each cue individually. We then show experimentally that ‘raw’ segmental information, augmented with word stress, allows the learning system to improve considerably upon those results . Secondly, we investigate several generalizations of the approach: basic segmental information also proves to be more predictive when the task is extended to encompass all open class words in English, and these findings can be replicated for a different (though related) language such as Dutch.
van Viersen, Sietske, Annemarie Kerkhoff & Elise H. de Bree
2024. Looking beyond literacy and phonology: word learning and phonological cue use in children with and without dyslexia. Frontiers in Language Sciences 3
Dodane, Christelle & Karine Martel
2023. Adaptations prosodiques et phonétiques dans le langage adressé aux enfants (LAE) : quel rôle dans le développement du langage oral et quelles similitudes avec d’autres contextes ?. Langages N° 230:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Frost, Rebecca L. A., Kirsty Dunn, Morten H. Christiansen, Rebecca L. Gómez, Padraic Monaghan & Kristof Strijkers
2020. Exploring the “anchor word” effect in infants: Segmentation and categorisation of speech with and without high frequency words. PLOS ONE 15:12 ► pp. e0243436 ff.
Lohmann, Arne
2017. Phonological properties of word classes and directionality in conversion. Word Structure 10:2 ► pp. 204 ff.
Reilly, Jamie, Jinyi Hung & Chris Westbury
2017. Non‐Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross‐Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness. Cognitive Science 41:4 ► pp. 1071 ff.
Arciuli, Joanne & Padraic Monaghan
2009. Probabilistic Cues to Grammatical Category in English Orthography and Their Influence During Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 13:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Christiansen, Morten H., Luca Onnis & Stephen A. Hockema
2009. The secret is in the sound: from unsegmented speech to lexical categories. Developmental Science 12:3 ► pp. 388 ff.
Kemp, Nenagh, Jodi Nilsson & Joanne Arciuli
2009. Noun or verb? Adult readers’ sensitivity to spelling cues to grammatical category in word endings. Reading and Writing 22:6 ► pp. 661 ff.
Zyzik, Eve & Clara Azevedo
2009. WORD CLASS DISTINCTIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Farmer, Thomas A., Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
2006. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:32 ► pp. 12203 ff.
2004. Functional Elements in Infants' Speech Processing: The Role of Determiners in the Syntactic Categorization of Lexical Elements. Infancy 5:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.