Article published in:
Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. HyamsEdited by Misha Becker, John Grinstead and Jason Rothman
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 54] 2013
► pp. 205–248
The syntactic domain of content
Hagit Borer | Queen Mary University of London
A main motivation for relegating Word Formation to the lexicon is the fact that its output is often non-compositional. The present article, however, presents a serious challenge to the presumed contradiction between non-compositionality and syntactic combinatorial processes. The investigation of N–N Constructs in Hebrew shows that equally syntactically complex expressions nonetheless interact differently with non-compositionality. Crucially, it is the syntactic differences between these expressions that give rise to distinct Content properties, with non-compositionality correlating not with syntactic structure as such, but with the absence of functional structure. The emerging syntactic domain of ‘word’ Content in turn allows the language learner to make informed decisions on where to look for non-compositionality and to draw the appropriate structural conclusions from its presence. Keywords: compounds; construct state nominals; genitive constructions; word formation; word compositionality
Published online: 18 April 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.54.09bor
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.54.09bor
Cited by
Cited by other publications
De Belder, Marijke
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.