Article published in:
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 75106
References

References

Aikhenvald, A.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A.
1988The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R.W.
1991Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds), 305–324. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y.
1994Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(2): 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgin-creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Balcı, A.
2000Grammatical categories. In Turkish Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, 
Z. Balpınar (ed.), 95–130. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
2013Acquisition of tense and aspect. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, P. Robinson (ed.), 6–8. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartning, I.
2003‘Je ne pense pas que ce soit vrai’ – le subjonctif un trait tardif dans l’acquisition du français L2. In Hommage à Jane Nystedt, M. Metzeltin (ed.), 31–49. Wien: Drei Eidechsen.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W.
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clairis, C. & Babiniotis, G.
1999Γραμματική της Νέας Ελληνικής (Δομολειτουργική – Επικοινωνιακή) τ. ΙΙ: Το Ρήμα της Νέας Ελληνικής: η Οργάνωση του Μηνύματος (Modern Greek Grammar: Structural, Functional and Communicative, II: The Verb: the Organization of the Message). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1976Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. & Terborg, H.
1991Modality and second language learning. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C. Ferguson (eds), 347–383. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Efstathiadi, L.
2010The use of epistemic markers as a means of hedging and boosting in the discourse of L1 and L2 speakers of Modern Greek: A corpus-based study in informal letter-writing. Themes in Science and Technology Education 3: 181–206.Google Scholar
Erguvanlı-Taylan, E.
1996On the parameter of aspect in Turkish. In Modern Studies in Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics , 
A. Konrot (ed.), 153–168. Eskişehir: Anadolu University.
1997Türkçede görünüş, zaman ve kiplik ilişkisi: {-DI} biçimbirimi. XI. Dilbilim Kurultayı: Bildiriler, 1–11.Google Scholar
2001On the relation between temporal/aspectual adverbs and the verb form in Turkish. In The Verb in Turkish [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44], E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (ed.), 97–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. & Özsoy, S.
1993Türkçedeki bazı kiplik biçimlerinin öğretimi üzerine. VII. Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri, 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
2006Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27: 464–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The elicited oral imitation test as a measure of implicit knowledge. In Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing, and Teaching, R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Edler, R. Erlam, J. Philp & H. Reinders (eds), 65–93. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gallimore, R. & Tharp, R.G.
1981The interpretation of elicited sentence imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning 31(2): 369–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A.
1992Grammaticalization processes in the area of temporal and modal relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 297–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güven, M.
2006Adverbials in Turkish: The Third Parameter in Aspectual Interpretation. 
Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Harley, B.
1992Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies 2: 159–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holton, D., Mackridge, P. & Philippaki-Warburton, I.
1997Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howard, M.
2008Morphosyntactic development in the expression of modality: The subjunctive in French L2 acquisition. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11: 171–192.Google Scholar
Iakovou, M.
1999Τροπικές Κατηγορίες στο Ρηµατικό Σύστηµα της Νέας Ελληνικής (Modal categories in the verbal system of Modern Greek). PhD Dissertation, University of Athens.
Ifantidou, E.
2001Evidentials and Relevance [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 86]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B.D. & Philippaki-Warburton, I.
1987Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Κaili, H.
2008 Πόσο διαρκεί ο χρόνος διαρκείας της Τουρκικής; Μια προσπάθεια επαναπροσδιορισμού του Geniş Zaman (How long does the Aorist of Turkish last? An attempt to redefine Geniş Zaman). In Languages for Intercultural Dialogue, J. Burston, E. Gavriel, 
M. Monville-Burston & P. Pavlou (eds), 75–85. Nicosia: Representation of the European Union in Cyprus.Google Scholar
Kaili, H. & Çeltek, A.
2011The Puzzling Case of Geniş Zaman for the Greek-speaking learners of Turkish. In Theoretical and Applied Researches on Turkish Language Teaching, L. Uzun & Ü. Bozkurt (eds), 545–557. Εssen: Die Blaue Eule.Google Scholar
2012On the teaching of -mIş to foreign learners of Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları 2012/2: 1–20.Google Scholar
Mozer, A.
1994Ποιόν και απόψεις του ρήματος (Aktionsart and Aspects of the Verb). Athens: Parousia.Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., Varlokosta, S., Spyropoulos, V., Kaili, H., Prokou, S. & Revithiadou, A.
2011Case morphology and word order in L2 Turkish: Evidence from Greek learners. Second Language Research 27 (2): 173–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plungian, V.A.
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 349–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ralli, A.
2005Μορφολογία (Morphology). Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Rosch, E.H.
1973On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, T.E. Moore (ed.), 111–144. New York NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roussou, A.
1999Modals and the subjunctive. In Studies in Greek Syntax, A. Alexiadou, G. Horrocks & M. Stavrou (eds), 169–183. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setatos, M.
1994aΕπιχειρηματολογικές χρήσεις πραγματολογικών μορίων στην κοινή νεοελληνική (Argumentative Uses of Pragmatic Particles in Standard Modern Greek). In Γλωσσολογικές Μελέτες (Linguistic Studies), M. Setatos (ed.), 127–146. Thessaloniki: 
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
1994bΕπιχειρηματολογικές χρήσεις του λέγω (Argumentative uses of lego). In Γλωσσολογικές Μελέτες (Linguistic Studies), M. Setatos (ed.), 147–166. Thessaloniki: 
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R.W.
1995The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71(4): 743–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Temürcü, C.
2007A Semantic Framework for Analyzing Tense, Aspect and Mood: An Application to the Ranges of Polysemy of -Xr, -DIr, -Iyor and -Ø in Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.
Terrell, T., Baycroft, B. & Perrone, C.
1987The subjunctive in Spanish interlanguage: Accuracy and comprehensibility. In Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective, B. VanPatten, T.R. Dvorak & J. Lee (eds), 23–48. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tsangalidis, A.
1999WILL and THA: A Comparative Study of the Category Future. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
2001Κριτήρια τροπικότητας: η κατηγορία των τροπικών μορίων στα νέα ελληνικά (Criteria for modality: the category of modal particles in Modern Greek). In Μελέτες για την ελληνική γλώσσα(Studies for the Greek Language) 21: 759–770. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
2003Kριτήρια τροπικότητας ΙΙ: η κατηγορία των τροπικών (ημι)βοηθητικών ρημάτων στη νέα ελληνική(Criteria for modality II: the category of modal (semi)auxiliary verbs in Modern Greek). In Μελέτες για την ελληνική γλώσσα (Studies for the Greek Language) 23: 733–744. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
2004Unidirectionality in the grammaticalization of modality in Greek. In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Ο. Fischer, M. Norde & H. Perridon (eds), 193–209. Αmsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Modals in Greek. In Modals in the Languages of Europe: A Reference Work, B. Hansen & F. De Haan (eds), 139–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012Evidentiality and modality: Evidence from emerging evidentials in Greek. Paper presented at the Conference ‘The Nature of Evidentiality ’, 14–16 June, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Veloudis, G.
1985Η δήλωση του χρόνου στα να- συμπληρώματα (The denotation of tense in na complements in Greek). In Μελέτες για την ελληνική γλώσσα (Studies for the Greek Language), 183–198. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
2001Νά και να (Ná and na). In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, G. Aggouraki, A. Arvaniti, J. Davy, D. Goutsos, M. Karyolemou, A. Panayiotou, A. Papapavlou, P. Pavlou & A. Roussou (eds), 243–250. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
Weitze, M., McGhee, J., Graham, R.C., Dewey, D.P., & Eggett, D.L.
2011Variability in L2 acquisition across L1 backgrounds. In Selected Proceedings of the 2009 Second Language Research Forum, L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (eds), 152–163. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Yavaş, F.
1980Οn the Meaning of the Tense and Aspect Markers in Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.