Article published in:Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 281–311
Non-native syntactic processing of Case and Agreement
Evidence from event-related potentials
The present study investigates the neural basis of syntactic processing in native and non-native speakers of Turkish, focusing on factors such as second language (L2) proficiency and language distance. Participants’ event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a grammaticality judgment task consisting of subject case and subject-verb agreement violation sentences. The results indicate that while case violations (the divergent condition) reveal different ERP components in native and non-native speakers, agreement violations in finite clauses (the convergent condition) do not. Nevertheless, during the processing of agreement violations in non-finite clauses (the partial divergent condition) only high-intermediate L2 learners show native-like brain processing mechanisms. Findings suggest that L2 syntactic processing is affected by language distance as well as L2 proficiency.
Keywords: case morphology, event-related brain potentials, L2 acquisition, subject-verb agreement, Turkish
Published online: 25 May 2016
2002 Finiteness, Case and Clausal Architecture. PhD dissertation, Harvard University. Printed in MITWPL Occasional Papers in Linguistics , Vol. 13, Cambridge MA 2004.
2007 Genitive case in complement clauses and reduced relatives in Turkic, California Linguistic Notes XXXII (2), http://english.fullerton.edu/publications/cln/clnarchives/spring2007archives.asp
2011 Reduced relatives and the location of agreement, California Linguistic Notes XXXVI (1). http://english.fullerton.edu/publications/cln/clnarchives/winter2011archives.asp
2013 Türkçede Uyum Özelliklerinin Olaya İlişkin Beyin Potansiyelleri Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi (An ERP Investigation on Agreement Features in Turkish). PhD dissertation, Ankara University.
Aygüneş, M., Kaşıkçı, I., Aydın, Ö., Demiralp, T.
2012 Türkçede uyum özelliklerinin işlemlenmesi: Olaya-ilişkin beyin potansiyelleri incelemesi (The processing of agreement features in Turkish: An ERP study), 16th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics , 18–20 September 2012, METU, Ankara.
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P.
Frisch, S. & Schlesewsky, M.
George, L. & Kornfilt, J.
Good, J., & Yu, A.C.
Greenhouse, S. & Geisser, S.
Hahne, A. & Friederici, A.D.
Kluender, R. & Kutas, M.
1979 The role of genitive suffix in relative clause in Turkish: A reply to Dede. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, C.Chiarello, J.Kingston, E.E.Sweetser, J.Collins, H.Kawasaki, J.Manley-Buser, D.W.Marschek, C. O’Connor, D.Shaul, M.Tobey H Thompson & K.Turner (eds.), 180–197. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
1984 Case Marking, Agreement and Empty Categories in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Kotz, S., Holcomb, P. & Osterhout, L.
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S.A.
Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L. & Carreiras, M.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H.K., & Kaushanskaya, M.
Mueller, J., Hirotani, M. & Friederici, A.D.
Mueller, J.J., Hahne, A, Fujii, Y. & Friederici, A.D.
Nevins, A., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S. & Phillips, C.
Ojima, S., Nakata, H. & Kakigi, R.
Osterhout, L. & Holcomb, P.J.
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkanen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C. & Molinaro, N.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M.F., Friederici, A.D. & Hahne, A.
Steinhauer, K., Friederici, A.D. & Alter, K.
Steinhauer, K., White, E.J. & Drury, J.E.
Tanner, D. & Van Hell, J.G.
Weber-Fox, Ch. M., & Neville, H.J.