Babyonyshev, M., Ganger, J., Pesetsky, D. & Wexler, K.
2001The maturation of grammatical principles: Evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 32:1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L.
1988Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C.
2011On grammatical maturation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed.), 45–54. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Wexler, K.
1987The maturation of syntax. In Parameter Setting, T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds), 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & McKee, C.
1985Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. Proceedings of NELS 15: 94–110. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R.
1998Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments in the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J.
1968The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, E. Bach & R. Harms (eds), 1–89. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Y.
2013Zibun-anaphora in child Japanese and nominative objects in potential sentences. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed), 43–59. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C. & Wexler, K.
2007The late acquisition of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, S. Dubinsky & B. Davies (eds), 35–70. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoshi, H.
1999Passives. In Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed), 191–235. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y.
1965Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Machida, N., Miyagawa, S. & Wexler, K.
2004A-chain maturation re-examined: Why Japanese children perform better on full unaccusatives than on passives. In MITWPL48 Plato’s Problems: Papers in Language Acquisition, A. Csirmaz, A. Gualmini & A. Nevins (eds), 91–112. Cambridge MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K.
1998The Acquisition of Japanese Case-particles and the Theory of Case Checking. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Miyata, S.
2004Japanese: Aki Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: Talkbank. 1-59642-055-3.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. & Nisisawa, H.
2009MiiPro – Asato Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-474-5.Google Scholar
2010MiiPro – Tomito Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-472-9.Google Scholar
Murasugi, K. & Kawamura, T.
2005On the acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. In The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity, J. Sabel & M. Saito (eds), 221–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nisisawa, H. & Miyata, S.
2009MiiPro – Nanami Corpus. Pittsburgh, PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-473-7.Google Scholar
2010MiiPro – ArikaM Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-475-3.Google Scholar
Noji, J., Naka, N. & Miyata, S.
2004Japanese: Noji Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-054-5.Google Scholar
Otsu, Y.
1997Zibun futatabi (Zibun revisited). In Ninchi/Gengo no Seiritsu: Ningen no Kokoro no Hattatsu (Emergence of Cognition and Language: Development of Human Mind), Program Committee (ed), 113–122. Tokyo: Kuba Pro.Google Scholar
1999First language acquisition. In Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed), 378–397. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saito, M.
2006Subjects of complex predicates: A preliminary study. Stony Brook Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 172–188. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Linguistics, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Sano, T.
2000Issues on unaccusatives and passives in the acquisition of Japanese. In Proceedings of the First Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed), 1–21. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
2013Remarks on theoretical accounts of Japanese children’s passive acquisition. In Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in Honor of Nina Hyams [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 54], M. Becker, J. Grinstead & J. Rothman (eds), 35–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sano, T., Endo, M. & Yamakoshi, K.
2001Developmental issues in the acquisition of Japanese unaccusatives and passives. In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, A.H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (eds), 668–683. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sano, T., Shimada, H. & Fujiwara, Y.
2014The lack of nominative-orientation for a Japanese anaphor zibun in L1 acquisition and its implications. In Proceedings of the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development, W. Orman & M.J. Valleau (eds), 393–402. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
2001Non-canonical constructions in Japanese. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], A. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & M. Onishi (eds), 307–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimada, H.
2015The acquisition of a Japanese anaphor zibun and the lack of external argument-orientation. Poster presented at the 6th Generative Approach to Language Acquisition North America at University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Takahashi, M.
2010Case valuation, phasehood, and nominative-accusative conversion in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 319–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takezawa, K.
1987A Configurational Approach to Case-Marking in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Wexler, K.
2004Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 48: 159–209.Google Scholar
2013Tough-movement developmental delay: Another effect of phasal computation. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, M. Piattelli-Palmarini & R.C. Berwick (eds), 148–167. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar