Part of
On the Acquisition of the Syntax of RomanceEdited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 259–278
Edited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 259–278
On the comprehension of recursive nominal modifiers in child Romanian
We investigate the comprehension of recursive locative adnominal PPs and subject RCs by Romanian monolinguals with a view to weighing the role of language specific properties (overt functional category encoding recursion and definiteness of the modified DP) in the acquisition of recursive structures. Our data show that comprehension of recursive nominal modifiers is delayed. Romanian 5- and 7-year-olds randomly assign a recursive or a conjunctive interpretation to recursive nominal modifiers. The availability of overt recursion markers in both modification structures is reflected in the absence of a main effect of structure; PP and RC modifiers are equally vulnerable. Our data suggest that children acquire recursive nominal modifiers late across languages, but language specific properties may determine the acquisition path.
Keywords: recursive structure, recursion marker, noun modifier, comprehension, Romanian
Article outline
- 1.Aim
- 2.Direct and indirect recursion
- 3.Recursion in language acquisition
- 4.Properties of Romanian recursive PP and RC noun modifiers
- 5.The study
- 5.1Main questions
- 5.2Method and participants
- 5.3Results
- 5.4Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgment -
References
References
Arsenijevic, B., & Hinzen, W.
(2012) On the absence of X-within-X recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(3), 423–440. :
.
.Chomsky, N.
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin, P. Otero Carlos, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp.133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. :.
.
(2014) Minimal recursion: Exploring the prospects. In T. Roeper & M. Speas (Eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition (pp.1–17). New York, NY: Springer.
Di Sciullo, A. M.
(2015) On the domain specificity of the human language faculty and the effects of principles of computational efficiency: Contrasting language and mathematics. Revista Linguística/Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Línguistica da Universidade Federal do Rio Janeiro, 11, 28–56.
Drăgan, R.
(2017) On the acquisition of prepositions in child Romanian. Paper presented at 5th Bucharest Colloquium of Language Acquisition, University of Bucharest, November 2017.
Giurgea, I.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. Tecumseh
(2002) The faculty of language: what it is, who has it and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579. :.
.Limbach, M., & Adone, D.
(2010) Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. In K. Franich, K. M. Iserman, & L. L. Keil (Eds.), BUCLD34: Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.281–290). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Castilla-Earls, A. P., Béjar, S., & Massam, D.
(2012) Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition, 19, 301–311. :
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Peterson, T., Castilla-Earls, A. P., Massam, D., & Béjar, S.
(2015) Nominal reference, modification and the acquisition of complex NPs (Unpublished manuscript). University of Toronto, University of Arizona, SUNY/Fredonia.
Roberge, Y., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., & Frolova, A.
to appear). On recursive modification in child L1 French. Languages 2.
Roeper, T.
(2010) The minimalist microscope: How and where interface principles guide acquisition. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G. M. Rheiner (Eds.), BUCLD33: Proceedings of the 33rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.24–48). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
(2011) The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics, 5, 57–86
Roeper, T. & Oseki, Y.
to appear). Recursion in the acquisition path for hierarchical syntactic structure. In L. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper Eds. Recursion across domains Cambridge CUP
Sevcenco, A., & Avram, L.
(2012) Romanian-speaking children’s comprehension of relatives. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LVII, 2, 219–239.
Sevcenco, A., Avram, L., & Stoicescu, I.
(2013) Subject and direct object relative clause production in child Romanian. In L. Avram & A. Sevcenco (Eds.), Topics in language acquisition and language learning in a Romanian context (pp.51–85). Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Sevcenco, A., Roeper, T., & Pearson-Zurer, B.
(2017) The acquisition of recursive locative PPs and relative clauses in child English. In H. Demirdache, J. Choi, O. Lungu, & L. Voeltzel (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2015 (pp.287–301). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Terunuma, A., Isobe, M., Nakajima, M., Okabe, R., Inada. S., Inokuma, S., & Nakato, T.
(2017) Acquisition of recursive possessives and locatives within DPs in Japanese. In M. LaMendola, & J. Scott (Eds.), BUCLD41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.626–636). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Ticio, E., & Avram, L.
(2015) The acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish and Romanian: Semantic scales or semantic features? Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LX, 4, 383–403.
Tóth, A. É., Kiss, K., & Roeper, T.
(2016) The role of the visible functional head in the interpretation of recursion. Paper presented at GALANA 7, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, September 2016.
Tóth, A.
(2017) The role of functional heads in Hungarian PP recursion. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on the Structures of Hungarian (ICSH 13), Budapest, June 2017.