Chapter published in:
Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edited by Tania Ionin and Matthew Rispoli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 63] 2019
► pp. 35–58

Children’s acquisition of sociolinguistic variation

| Penn State University
This paper provides a review of past research on children’s acquisition of sociolinguistic variation and the impact that variable input has on the acquisition of grammatical morphology. I describe findings from both corpus studies and experimental studies, focusing primarily on the acquisition of variably produced plural morphology and subject-verb agreement. I make two predictions: (i) variable input impacts the time course of acquisition, such that variably produced morphology takes longer to acquire than non-variably produced morphology. And, (ii) variable input does not impact patterns of acquisition. Regardless of input-type, children pass through the same developmental linguistic stages.
Keywords: variation, sociolinguistics, variable input, dialect, language acquisition, children, Spanish, English
Published online: 15 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.03mil
References

References

Brown, R.
(1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Chevrot, J-P., Nardy, A., & Barbu, S.
(2011) Developmental dynamics of SES-related differences in children’s production of obligatory and variable phonological alternations. Language Sciences, 33, 180–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.
(1987) The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp.1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eisel Hendricks, A., Miller, K., & Jackson, C.
(2015) Regularization or probability-matching? Acquisition of inconsistent gender marking in Fering-speaking children. In E. Grillo, K. Jepson, & M. LaMendola (Eds.), Boston University Conference on Language Development 39, Online Proceedings Supplement. Retrieved at < http://​www​.bu​.edu​/bucld​/supplementvol39​/> Google Scholar
(2018) Regularizing unpredictable variation: Evidence from a natural language setting. Language Learning and Development, 14, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G., & Watt, D.
(2005) Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language, 81, 177–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., & Rizzi, L.
(2002) Agreement and tense as distinct syntactic positions. In G. Cinque (Ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures (pp.167–194). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Guy, G., & Boyd, S.
(1990) The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change, 3, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halberda, J.
(2002) The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition, 87, B23-B24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T., & Hyams, N.
(1998) Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106, 81–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kovac, C., & Adamson, H. D.
(1980) Variation theory and first language acquisition. In D. Sankoff & H. Cedergren (Eds.), Variation omnibus: Current inquiry into language and linguistics (pp.403–410). Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistics Research.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1989) The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change, 1, 85–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. M.
(2015) From “more” to “less”: Spanish, Palenquero (Afro-Colombian creole) and gender agreement. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1–12.Google Scholar
Lukyanenko, C., & Miller, K.
(2016) Learning the plural from variable input: An eye-tracking study. Paper presented at the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America (GALANA) 7, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Markman, E., & Wachtel, G.
(1988) Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meaning of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K.
(2007) Variable input and the acquisition of plurality in two varieties of Spanish(Unpublished PhD dissertation). Michigan State University.Google Scholar
(2013) Acquisition of variable rules: /s/-lenition in the speech of Chilean Spanish-speaking children and their caregivers. Language Variation and Change, 25, 311–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(in preparation) Dominican Republic child-caregiver corpus (DRCC). National Science Foundation BCS-1322763, < http://​childlanguagelab​.la​.psu​.edu​/research​.html>​. Google Scholar
Miller, K., & Schmitt, C.
(2010) Effects of variable input in the acquisition of plural in two dialects of Spanish. Lingua, 120, 1178–1193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Variable input and the acquisition of plural morphology. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Language Development, 19, 223–261.Google Scholar
(in preparation) Chilean child-caregiver corpus (CCC). National Science Foundation BCS-1061805 < http://​childlanguagelab​.la​.psu​.edu​/research​.html> Google Scholar
Miller, K.
(2015) Children’s production of ain’t In: P., Donaher & S., Katz (eds.) Ain’thology: The History and Life of the Taboo Word Ain’t. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 96–112. Google Scholar
Montrul, S. & Potowski, K.
(2007) Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish-English Bilingual Children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(3), 301–328.Google Scholar
Oetting, J., & McDonald, J.
(2001) Nonmainstream dialect use and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 207–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1984) Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rispoli, M., Hadley, P., & Holt, J.
(2012) Sequence and system in the acquisition of tense and agreement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1007–1021. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J.
(1997) Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t,d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 24, 351–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C.
(2010) The status of nonagreeing don’t and theories of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 17(4), 235–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C. T., & Wexler, K.
(1996) Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.670–681). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shin, N.
(2016) Acquiring constraints on morphosyntactic variation: Children’s Spanish subject pronoun expression. Journal of Child Language, 43, 914–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, J., & Newport, E.
(2004) When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 370–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Durham, M., & Fortune, L.
(2007) Mam, my trousers is fa’in doon!: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change, 19, 63–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change, 21, 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P.
(1974) The semantics of children’s language. American Psychologist, 29, 103–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K.
(1994) Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivation in child language. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp.305–350). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W., & Schilling-Estes, N.
(1998) American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yang, C.
(2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar