Cover not available
Part of
Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edited by Tania Ionin and Matthew Rispoli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 63] 2019
► pp. 125–142

When OR is conjunctive in child Mandarin

| Hubei University of Technology
| Macquarie University
| Macquarie University
According to a recent proposal, children license a conjunctive inference for statements with disjunction even without a licensing expression that adults require, e.g., the deontic modal verb is allowed to (Singh, Wexler, Astle, Kamawar, & Fox, 2016; Tieu et al., 2017). However, the rates of children’s conjunctive inferences vary considerably across studies, which may be due to the different experimental tasks and materials. Using a Truth Value Judgment Task (Crain & Thornton, 1998), the present study systematically investigated children’s interpretation of disjunctive sentences with and without a deontic modal verb. It was found that children computed conjunctive inferences only in sentences with the deontic modal verb. We discuss the possible reasons for the varying findings of children’s interpretation of disjunction in previous studies.
Keywords: free choice inferences, disjunction, child language acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Children’s conjunctive interpretation of disjunction
    • 2.2Children’s interpretation of disjunction
    • 2.3Children’s computation of free choice inferences
  • 3.Experiments
    • 3.1Experiment 1
    • 3.2Experiment 2
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 15 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.07hua
References (38)
References
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2006). Disjunction in alternative semantics (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2013). Grammatical alternatives and pragmatic development. In A. Falaus (Ed.), Alternatives in semantics (pp.238–266). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition 118(1), 84–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boster, C. T., & Crain, S. (1993). On children’s understanding of every and or. In C. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of Early Cognition and the Transition to Language (pp.1–23). Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Chemla, E. (2009). Similarity: Towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice and intervention. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Scalar implicature and their interface with grammar. The Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In A. Do, L. Domínguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., Crain, S., & Foppolo, F. (2004). Semantic and pragmatic competence in children’s and adults’ comprehension of or. In I. A. Noveck, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp.283–300). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., & Thornton, R. (1998). Some and or: A study on the emergence of logical form. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, & H. Walsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Gardner, A., Gualmini, A., & Rabbin, B. (2002). Children’s command of negation. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp.71–95). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2002). Why language acquisition is a snap. The Linguistic Review, 19(1–2), 163–184.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp.71–120). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franke, M. (2011). Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation. Semantics and Pragmatics, 4, 1–82.Google Scholar
Goro, T., & Akiba, S. (2004). The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp.101–114). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Goro, T., Minai, U., & Crain, S. (2005). Two disjunctions for the price of only one. In A. Brugos, M. Clark-Cotton, & H. Seungwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.228–239). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T. (2001). At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolenszky (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT XI (pp.231–247). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jing, C.-Y., Crain, S., & Hsu, C.-F. (2005). The interpretation of focus in Chinese: Child versus adult language. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp.165–190). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. (1973). Free choice permission. Proceedings of Aristotelian Society, 74, 57–74.Google Scholar
(1978). Semantics versus pragmatics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kiguchi, H., & Thornton, R. (2016). Connectivity effects in pseudoclefts in child language. Studia Linguistica, 70(1), 34–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klinedinst, N. (2007). Plurality and possibility (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp.1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Morris, B. J. (2008). Logically speaking: Evidence for item-based acquisition of the connectives AND and OR. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(1), 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Notley, A., Zhou, P., Jensen, B., & Crain, S. (2012). Children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of ‘before’: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 482–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Skordos, D. (2016). Scalar implicature. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp.611–632). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schulz, K. (2005). A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice permission. Synthese, 147(2), 343–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., Wexler, K., Astle, A., Kamawar, D., & Fox, D. (2016). Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development. Natural Language Semantics, 24(4), 305–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spector, B. (2007). Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In U. Sauerland, & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp.243–281). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Y. (2015). The acquisition of logical connectives in child Mandarin. Language Acquisition, 21, 119–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Y., & Crain, S. (2013). Children’s knowledge of disjunction and universal quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 14(3), 599–631.Google Scholar
Tieu, L., Romoli, J., Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2016). Children’s knowledge of free choice inferences and scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 33, 269–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieu, L., Yatsuhiro, K., Cremers, A., Romoli, J., Sauerland, U., & Chemla, E. (2017). On the role of alternatives in the acquisition of simple and complex disjunctions in French and Japanese. Journal of Semantics, 34, 127–152.Google Scholar
van Rooij, R. (2010). Conjunctive interpretation of disjunction. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3(11), 1–28.Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Romoli, J., & Crain, S. (2013). Children's knowledge of free choice inferences. In T. Snider (Ed.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 23 (pp.632–651). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, T. E. (2000). Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics, 8(4), 255–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar