Adani, F., Van der Lely, H. K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T.
(2010) Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120(9), 2148–2166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T.
(2009) Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clases by children. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarró, & J. Solà (Eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition (pp. 138–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Martin M., Ben B., & Steve W.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., & Contemori, C.
(2010) Disentangling the mastery of object relatives in children and adults. Evidence from Italian. In V. Moscati & E. Servidio (Eds.), STiL - Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition 4) (pp. 25–47). Siena: University of Sienna.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., Brunato, D., & Rizzi, L.
(2012) Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122(10), 1053–1069. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B.
(1976) Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and language, 3(4), 572–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M.
(1991) Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M.
(1991) Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frauenfelder, U., Segui, J., & Mehler, J.
(1980) Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(3), 328–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L.
(1978)  On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
(1987) Sentence processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance, XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K.
(1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L.
(2009) Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1), 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N.
(2008) Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(2), 177–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N.
(2009) Generalized minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua, 119(10), 1426–1443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Vernice, M., & Franck, J.
(2018) Continuity in the adult and children’s comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in French and Italian. Languages, 3(3), 24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, J. W., & Kutas, M.
(1995) Who did what and when? Using word- and causal- level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2015) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-32.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S.
(2005) An activation‐based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H.
(2002) The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 466–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElree, B.
(2000) Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 111–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L.
(2003) Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer Software]. Vienna. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A.
(2012) E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kühn, K.
(1995) The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 8, 499–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, G., & Tabor, W.
(2018) Toward a theory of timing effects in self organized sentence processing. In I. Juvina, J. Houpt, & C. Meyers (Eds.), Proceedings of ICCM 2018, 16th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 21-24 July, University of Wisconsin, Madison (pp. 138–143). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S.
(2004) Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 431.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B.
(2006) Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villata, S., Sprouse, J., & Tabor, W.
(2019) Modeling ungrammaticality: A self-organizing model of islands. In A. K. Goel, C. M. Seifert, & C. Freska (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1178–1184). Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Villata, S., Tabor, W., & Franck, J.
(2018) Encoding and retrieval interference in sentence comprehension: Evidence from agreement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Biondo, N., E. Pagliarini, V. Moscati, L. Rizzi & A. Belletti
2023. Features matter: the role of number and gender features during the online processing of subject- and object- relative clauses in Italian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 38:6  pp. 802 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.