Chapter published in:
Typical and Impaired Processing in Morphosyntax
Edited by Vincent Torrens
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 64] 2020
► pp. 5771
References

References

Adani, F., Van der Lely, H. K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T.
(2010) Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120(9), 2148–2166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T.
(2009) Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clases by children. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarró, & J. Solà (Eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition (pp. 138–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Martin M., Ben B., & Steve W.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., & Contemori, C.
(2010) Disentangling the mastery of object relatives in children and adults. Evidence from Italian. In V. Moscati & E. Servidio (Eds.), STiL - Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition 4) (pp. 25–47). Siena: University of Sienna.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., Brunato, D., & Rizzi, L.
(2012) Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122(10), 1053–1069. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B.
(1976) Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and language, 3(4), 572–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M.
(1991) Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M.
(1991) Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frauenfelder, U., Segui, J., & Mehler, J.
(1980) Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(3), 328–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L.
(1978)  On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
(1987) Sentence processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance, XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K.
(1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L.
(2009) Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1), 67–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N.
(2008) Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(2), 177–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N.
(2009) Generalized minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua, 119(10), 1426–1443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Vernice, M., & Franck, J.
(2018) Continuity in the adult and children’s comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in French and Italian. Languages, 3(3), 24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, J. W., & Kutas, M.
(1995) Who did what and when? Using word- and causal- level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2015) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-32.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S.
(2005) An activation‐based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H.
(2002) The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 466–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McElree, B.
(2000) Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 111–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L.
(2003) Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer Software]. Vienna. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A.
(2012) E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kühn, K.
(1995) The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 8, 499–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G., & Tabor, W.
(2018) Toward a theory of timing effects in self organized sentence processing. In I. Juvina, J. Houpt, & C. Meyers (Eds.), Proceedings of ICCM 2018, 16th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 21-24 July, University of Wisconsin, Madison (pp. 138–143). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S.
(2004) Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 431.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B.
(2006) Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villata, S., Sprouse, J., & Tabor, W.
(2019) Modeling ungrammaticality: A self-organizing model of islands. In A. K. Goel, C. M. Seifert, & C. Freska (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1178–1184). Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Villata, S., Tabor, W., & Franck, J.
(2018) Encoding and retrieval interference in sentence comprehension: Evidence from agreement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2.Google Scholar