Cover not available
Part of
Typical and Impaired Processing in Morphosyntax
Edited by Vincent Torrens
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 64] 2020
► pp. 137–152

A good-enough representation is not good enough

| Macquarie University
It has been proposed that language processing invokes extra-grammatical heuristics in addition to, or instead of the computational system (e.g., Townsend & Bever, 2001; Karimi & Ferreira, 2016). The outputs of these extra-grammatical heuristics are called “good-enough” representations. These representations lack (syntactic) detail and are incomplete (Karimi & Ferreira, 2016). This paper evaluates this claim by investigating one extra-grammatical processing heuristic in particular: the NV(N)-strategy. Two experiments prove that (i) interpretations that would result from application of the NV(N)-strategy are sometimes difficult to generate and (ii) listeners compute (syntactic) representations for sentences that are more detailed than the NV(N)-strategy would predict. This gives rise to the question whether “good-enough” representations are computed at all.
Keywords: good-enough representations, extra-grammatical processing heuristics, parsing, unaccusativity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Processing heuristics
  • 3.Another case in which the NV(N)-strategy fails
    • 3.1Experiment 1
  • 4.The meaning representations of ungrammatical sentences
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.64.07kor
References (26)
References
Agnew, Z. K., van de Koot, H., McGettigan, C., & Scott, S. K. (2014). Do sentences with unaccusative verbs involve syntactic movement? Evidence from neuroimaging. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(9), 1035–1045. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In R. Hayes (ed.) Cognition and the development of language development (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., & Sanz, M. (1997). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension: Unaccusatives in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 69–91.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, A. R. (2007). The asymmetry of argument structure: Evidence from coercion. Semantics and Processing (UMOP 37).
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The “Good Enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1, 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. (2007). Young children and A-chains: The acquisition of Hebrew Unaccusatives. Language Acquisition, 14, 377–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Taranto, G., Shapiro, L. P., & Swinney, D. (2008). The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 355–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackl, M. (1998). On the semantics of ability attributions (Unpublished manuscript). MIT.
Hoekstra, T. (1984). Transitivity: Grammatical relations in government- binding theory (Unpublished dissertation). Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
van Hout, A. (2004). Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 60–83). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal Experimental Psychology, 69(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koornneef, A., & Reuland, E. (2016). On the shallow processing (dis)advantage: Grammar and economy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(82). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koring, L., Mak, P., & Reuland, E. (2012). The time course of argument reactivation revealed: Using the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 123, 361–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(3), 217–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S. (1989). Light verbs and the ergative hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(4), 659–668.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In J. J. Jaeger, A. C. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O. D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E. E. Sweetser, H. Thompson, & K. W. Whistler (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 157–189). Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D., & Postal, P. (1984). The 1-advancement exclusiveness law. Studies in Relational Grammar, 2, 81–125.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2000). The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
(2002). The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 229–290.Google Scholar
(2016). The Theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. In M. Everaert, M. Marelj, E. Reuland, & T. Siloni (Eds.), Concepts, syntax, and their interface: The theta system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shetreet, E., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage, 60(3), 1800–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, E., Friedmann, N., & Hadar, U. (2010). The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2306–2315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar