Chapter published in:
Typical and Impaired Processing in Morphosyntax
Edited by Vincent Torrens
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 64] 2020
► pp. 177–207

A syntactically based treatment of relative clauses

Three case studies of Italian children with cochlear implant

| Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
| University of Padua
| University of Padua
| University of Padua
| Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
In this paper, we describe three case studies of a syntactic intervention given to three Italian-speaking children with cochlear implants (CIs) to improve proficiency in the production and comprehension of relative clauses, and also their narrative skills. The methodology adopted for the syntactic intervention follows previous studies on aphasic patients with agrammatism and children with developmental language disorders (DLD). Indeed, these studies have shown that an explicit teaching of syntactic rules helps in the recovery and improvement of complex structures derived by syntactic movement. Results showed a general improvement in the production and comprehension of relative clauses, and generalization effects to untrained structures. Moreover, also narrative skills improved. Results were maintained several months after the end of the syntactic intervention.
Keywords: language acquisition, relative clauses, narrative skills, syntactic intervention, hearing loss, cochlear implants
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The acquisition of relative clauses in Italian
  • 3.Treatment of relative clauses
  • 4.Methodology
    • Participants
    • Materials
      • The elicited production task
      • The comprehension task
      • The Frog story
  • 5.Results prior to intervention
    • LB’s performance
    • ES’s performance
    • MM’s performance
  • 6.Explicit intervention of relative clauses in Italian-speaking children with CIs
    • Phase 1: Verb argument structure and Theta criterion
    • Phase 2: Wh-movement
    • Phase 3: Review
  • 7.Results after intervention
    • LB’s performance
    • ES’s performance
    • MM’s performance
    • ES and MM’s improvement of narrative skills
  • 8.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.64.09dor
References
Adani, F.
(2011) Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 141–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T.
(2009) Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarró, J. Solà (Eds.), Merging features: computation, interpretation, and acquisition (pp. 138–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, K. J., & Thompson, C. K.
(1999) Treatment and generalization of complex sentence production in agrammatism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(3), 690–707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., & Contemori, C.
(2010) Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo, & F. Pratas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development. Proceedings of Gala 2009 (pp. 39–52). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bianchi, V.
(1999) Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carpenedo, C.
(2011)  On the production of relative clauses by middle school age adolescents: An elicitation experiment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ca’Foscari University of Venice.
Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Varuzza, C., Giuliani, A., & Burdo, S.
(2012) Cochlear implant in the second year of life: Lexical and grammatical outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 382–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. S., & Miller, J. F.
(1975) Word order in early two- and three-word utterances: Does production precede comprehension? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 346–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chesi, C.
(2006) Il linguaggio verbale non-standard dei bambini sordi [The non-standard language in children with hearing loss]. Rome: GAIA srl-Edizioni Univ. Romane.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1977) On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1988) La frase relativa [The relative clause]. In L. Renzi, G. Salvi, & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione: I. La frase. I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale [Italian big grammar for consulation: I. Sentence. Nominal Phrases and Prepositional Phrases]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Contemori, C., & Garraffa, M.
(2010) Comparison of modalities in SLI syntax: A study on the comprehension and production of non-canonical sentences. Lingua, 120(8), 1940–1955. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Marano, A., & Albano, S.
(2008) La valutazione della competenza narrativa in bambini prescolari e scolari attraverso un libro illustrato [The assessment of narrative skills in pre-scholar and scholar children resorting to an illustrated book]. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 8(1/2), 1000–1018.Google Scholar
De Nichilo, A.
(2017) Insegnamento esplicito delle strutture sintattiche a movimento: Pronomi clitici, frasi passive e frasi relative in uno studente bengalese con italiano L2 [Explicit teaching of syntactic structures derived by movement: Clitic pronouns, passivee sentences, and relative clauses in a Bengali student with Italiana s L2] (Unpublished MA dissertation). Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.Google Scholar
De Villiers, P. A.
(1988) Assessing English syntax in hearing-impaired children: Eliciting production in pragmatically-motivated situations. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 21(mono.suppl.), 41–71.Google Scholar
Delage, H., & Durrleman, S.
(2018) Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Distinct syntactic profiles? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(8), 758–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Ortenzio, S.
(2018) Training the comprehension and production of restrictive relative clauses. Generative Grammar@ Geneva, 11,135–156.Google Scholar
D’Ortenzio, S., Montino, S., Martini, A., & Volpato, F.
(2017) Il trattamento delle frasi relative in un bambino sordo portatore di impianto cocleare [Treatment of relative clauses in a boy with hearing impairment fitted with CI]. In F. M. Dovetto (Ed.), Lingua e patologia. Le frontiere interdisciplinari del linguaggio [Language and pathology. The interdisciplinary frontiers of language] (pp. 273–285). Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
D’Ortenzio, S., & Volpato, F.
(2020) How do Italian-speaking children handle wh-questions? A comparison between children with hearing loss and children with normal hearing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(4), 407–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebbels, S. H.
(2007) Teaching grammar to school-aged children with specific language impairment using shape coding. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23(1), 67–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Effectiveness of intervention for grammar in school-aged children with primary language impairments: A review of the evidence. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(1), 7–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Intervention research: Appraising study designs, interpreting findings and creating research in clinical practice. International Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 19(3), 218–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebbels, S. H., Van der Lely, H. K., & Dockrell, J. E.
(2007) Intervention for verb argument structure in children with persistent SLI: A randomized control trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1330–1349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2009) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky R.
(2007) Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain & Language, 101, 50–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Novogrodsky, R., Szterman, R., & Preminger, O.
(2008) Resumptive pronouns as last resort when movement is impaired: Relative clauses in hearing impairment. Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics, 134, 276–290.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Szterman, R.
(2006) Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 56–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The comprehension and production of wh-questions in deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 212–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N.
(2008) Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of neurolinguistics, 21(2), 177–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C.
(2009) Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses. Cognition, 111(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N.
(2008) Generalized minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T.
(2017) Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., & Cardinaletti, A.
(2003) Relative clauses formation in Romance child’s production. Probus, 15(1), 47–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Papagno, C., Vernice, M., Cecchetto, C., Giuliani, A., & Burdo, S.
(2014) The effect of language structure on linguistic strengths and weaknesses in children with cochlear implants: Evidence from Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 739–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guida, M., Fagnani, U., & Ambrosetti, U.
(2014) Impianto colceare e nucleare [Cochlear and nuclear implants]. In U. Ambrosetti, L. Del Bo, & F. Di Berardino (Eds.), Audiologia protesica [Prosthetic Audiology]. Torino: Edizioni Minerva medica.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Hansson, K.
(2000) Comprehension and production of relative clauses: A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language, 27, 313–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, P., & Koster, C.
(2010) Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua, 120(8), 1887–1897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B. J., & Thompson, C. K.
(2000) Cross-modal generalization effects of training noncanonical sentence comprehension and production in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(1), 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S.
(1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levy, H., & Friedmann, N.
(2009) Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. First Language, 29(1), 15–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manetti, C., & Belletti, A.
(2013) Causatives and the acquisition of the Italian passive. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development. Proceedings of GALA 2013 (pp. 282–298). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Martini, A., Bovo, R., Trevisi, P., Forli, F., & Berrettini, S.
(2013) L’impianto cocleare nel bambino: Razionale, indicazioni, costo/efficacia [Cochlear implant in the child: Rational, incations, costs/benefits]. Minerva Pediatrica, 65(3), 325–339.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2009) Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 599–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M.
(1969) Frog, where are you? New York, NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
McClellan, J., Yewchuk, C., & Holdgrafer, G.
(1986) Comprehension and production of word order by 2-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 97–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., & Wimmer, E.
(2018) Deficits in comprehending wh-questions in children with hearing loss–the contribution of phonological short-term memory and syntactic complexity. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(3), 267–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piccoli, E.
(2018)  Ripetizione e produzione elicitata di frasi complesse in studenti adolescenti con DSA e stranieri. Un protocollo di insegnamento esplicito [Repetition and elicited production of complex sentences in adolescent students with Learninf disorders. A protocol for the explicit teaching] (Unpublished MA dissertation). Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Pivi, M., Del Puppo, G., & Cardinaletti A.
(2016) The elicited oral production of Italian restrictive relative clauses and cleft sentences in typically developing children and children with developmental dyslexia. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, M. Juan-Garau, & P. Larrañaga (Eds.) Acquisition of Romance languages (pp. 231–261). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, P., & Caselli, M. C.
(2009) Lexical and grammatical abilities in deaf Italian preschoolers: The role of duration of formal language experience. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14, 63–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roth, F. P.
(1984), Accelerating language learning in young children. Journal of Child Language, 11(1):89–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spenader, J., Smits, E. J., & Hendriks, P.
(2009) Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Journal of Child Language, 36, 23–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szterman, R., Friedmann, N.
(2015) Insights into the syntactic deficit of children with hearing impairment from a sentence repetition task. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development. Proceedings of GALA 2013. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. K.
(2003) Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 151–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P.
(1995) Training sentence production in agrammatism: Implications for normal and disordered language. Brain and Language, 50(2), 201–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of Underlying Forms. Aphasiology, 19(10–11):1021–1036. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 30–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vincenti, V., Bacciu, A., Guida, M., Mara, F., Bertoldi, B., Bacciu, S., & Pasanisi, E.
(2014) Pediatric cochlear implantation: An update. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 40. 72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Volpato, F.
(2010)  The acquisition of relative clauses and phi-features: Evidence from hearing and hearing-impaired populations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
(2012) The comprehension of relative clauses by hearing and hearing-impaired, cochlear-implanted children: The role of marked number features. In Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn IV Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages (pp. 306–325). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Volpato, F., & Adani, F.
(2009) The subject/object relative clause asymmetry in Italian hearing-impaired children: Evidence from a comprehension task. Studies in Linguistics, 3, 269–281.Google Scholar
Volpato, F., & Bozzolan, G.
(2017) Explicit teaching of syntactic movement in passive sentences and relative clauses: The case of a Romanian/ Italian sequential bilingual child. Annali di Ca’ Foscari - Serie Occidentale, 51, 357–381.Google Scholar
Volpato, F., & Vernice, M.
(2014) The production of relative clauses by Italian cochlear-implanted and hearing children. Lingua, 139, 39–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization
(2018) Deafness and hearing loss. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://​www​.who​.int​/news​-room​/fact​-sheets​/detail​/deafness​-and​-hearing​-loss (3 May, 2020).Google Scholar