Cover not available
Part of
L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: The view from Romance
Edited by Larisa Avram, Anca Sevcenco and Veronica Tomescu
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 65] 2021
► pp. 67–82

Chapter 3
Cost-reducing strategies in the production of Brazilian Portuguese relative clauses

Language impairment in the syntactic domain

| PUC-Rio
| UERJ

This paper investigates the production of relative clauses (RCs) by Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children/adolescents, focusing on cost-reducing RCs strategies that may circumvent syntactic language impairment. Different types of RCs are elicited from participants at risk of language impairment (LI) and an age-matched control group. The results support the differential demands of these structures. Group differences are restricted to moderate-severe LI participants on standard direct object (DO) RCs. The greater demands of indirect object/prepositional phrase (IO/PP) RCs in relation to DO RCs can be nevertheless noticed in the use of resumptive pronouns predominantly in IO/PP RCs. More truncated/inappropriate responses appear in the LI group. Although cost-reducing strategies can largely circumvent LI effects, the overall quality of responses can distinguish LI children.

Keywords: relative clauses, language impairment, cost-reducing strategies, elicited production, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cost-reducing strategies in Brazilian Portuguese
  • 3.Eliciting the production of relative clauses
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Material and apparatus
      • 3.1.3Procedure
    • 3.2Results
    • 3.3Breakdown of responses
  • 4.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.65.03cor
References
Adani, F.
(2012) Some notes on the acquisition of relative clauses: New data and open questions. In Internet celebration for Luigi Rizzi’s 60th birthday, CISCL, Siena (pp. 6–13). Retrieved from [URL]
Batoréo, H.
(2000) Expressão do espaço no português europeu: contributo psicolingüístico para o estudo da linguagem e cognição [Expressions of space in European Portuguese: Psycholinguistic contribution for the study of language and cognition]. Coimbra: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., & Greenhalgh, T.
(2016) CATALISE: A Multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children. PLOS ONE, 11(7): e0158753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S.
(1995) An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(3), 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) O DEL à luz de hipóteses psico/linguísticas: Avaliação de habilidades linguísticas e implicações para uma possível intervenção em problemas de linguagem de natureza sintática [SLI in the light of psycholinguistic hypotheses: An assessment of langauge abilities and implications of a possible intervention in syntactic difficulties] Veredas Online, Especial, 207–236.Google Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S., Augusto, M. R. A., & Bagetti, T.
(2013) Processing cost in sentence comprehension as a predictor of language impairment in production: Syntactic movement and extended Relativized Minimality in a model of on-line computation. In S. Stavrakaki, M. Lalioti, & P. Konstantinopoulou (Eds.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 395–404). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S., Augusto, M. R. A., & Marcilese, M.
(2018) Competing analyses and differential cost in the production of non-subject relative clauses. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 62–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, J., Friedmann, N., Silva, C., & Yachini, M.
(2015) The acquisition of PP relatives in Hebrew and European Portuguese: Another window into the atoms of intervention. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2013 (pp. 35–48). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M.
(1979) Children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(5), 499–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M.
(2000) The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1/2), 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fluck, M. J.
(1978) Comprehension of relative clauses by children aged five to nine years. Language and Speech, 21, 190–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L.
(2009) Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1), 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frizelle, P., & Fletcher, P.
(2014) Relative clause constructions in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(2), 255–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C., & Lowder, M. W.
(2012) Complex sentence processing: A review of theoretical perspectives on the comprehension of relative clauses. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6/7, 403–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N.
(2009) Generalized Minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua, 119(10), 1426–1443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y.
(1989) Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses. Brain and Language, 37, 480–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grolla, E., & Augusto, M.
(2016) Absolutive constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and Relativized Minimality effects in children’s productions. In L. Perkins, R. Dudley, J. Gerard, & K. Hitczenko (Eds.), Proceedings of GALANA VI – Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (pp. 36–47). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., & Cardinaletti, A.
(2003) Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus, 15(1), 48–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B.
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99. Retrieved from [URL]
Kenedy, E.
(2008) As orações relativas preposicionadas e a hipótese da antinaturalidade de pied-piping [Prepositional phrase relative clauses and the antinaturality of pied-piping hypothesis]. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos Veredas, 2(2006), 92–111.Google Scholar
Mollica, M. C.
(2003) Relativas em tempo real no português brasileiro contemporâneo [Relative clauses in real time in contemporary Brazilian Portuguese]. In M. C. Paiva & M. E. L. Duarte (Eds.), Mudança lingüística em tempo real [Language change in real time] (pp. 129–138). Contra Capa/Faperj.Google Scholar
Negrão, E., & Viotti, E.
(2010) A Estrutura sintática das sentenças absolutas no português brasileiro [The syntactic structure of absolutive clauses in Brazilian Portuguese]. Linguistica, 23, 37–58.Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N.
(2006) The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4), 364–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I.
(2011) On Relativized Minimality, memory and cue‑based parsing. Iberia – An International Jounal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3(1), 35–64.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A.
(1974) The role of parallel functions in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 231–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, B. G. S. G., & Lopes, C. R. S.
(2007) O papel da frequência na gramaticalização do que: Análise das estratégias de relativização no português do Brasil [The role of frequency in the grammaticalization of “que”: An anlaysis of the relativization strategies in Brazilian Protuguese]. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos: Veredas, 1, 80–100.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A. & McElree, B.
(2006) Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasconcelos, M.
(1991) Compreensão e produção de frases com orações relativas: um estudo experimental com crianças dos três anos e meio aos oito anos e meio [The comprehension and production of relative clauses: an experimental study with three and a half to eight and a half year old children] (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Lisbon.
Wanner, E., & Maratsos, M.
(1978) An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. A. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119–161). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Warren, T., & Gibson, E.
(2002) The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, 85(1), 79–112. Retrieved from [URL]