Cover not available
Part of
L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: The view from Romance
Edited by Larisa Avram, Anca Sevcenco and Veronica Tomescu
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 65] 2021
► pp. 109–132

Chapter 5
The production of variable number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese

A procedural and developmental account

| Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
| Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
This chapter focuses on the production of variable number agreement by Brazilian Portuguese (BP) speaking children/adolescents. Number agreement in BP can be redundant, with obligatory morphological plural marking in all the agreeing elements (standard variety), or non-redundant, with obligatory morphological plural marking on the determiner and optional plural marking on the noun and on post-nominal agreeing elements (non-standard variety). The results of an elicited production task are recapped here. A production model of number agreement on the DP is provided. It is argued that an underspecified morphophonological feature [±redundant] in the morphological component of the lexicon is required to account for optionality in number marking and for developmental changes regarding the expression of number agreement in speech.
Keywords: language development, language production, variable input, number agreement, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Variation of number agreement in BP
  • 3.Variation in the generative framework
  • 4.Variation in language acquisition
    • 4.1Developmental changes in the production of variable number agreement in BP
    • 4.2Discussion
  • 5.The production of variable number agreement in BP
  • 6.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.65.05jak
References (45)
References
Adger, D. (2006). Combinatorial variability. Journal of Linguistics, 42(3), 503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D., & Smith, J. (2005). Variation and the minimalist program. In L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 149–178). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Variation in agreement: A lexical feature-based approach. Lingua, 120(5), 1109–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alves, M. T. G., Soares, J. F., & Xavier, F. P. (2014). Índice Socioeconômico das Escolas de Educação Básica Brasileiras [Socioeconomic index of Brazilian Basic Education schools]. Ensaio: Aval. Pol. Públ. Educ., 22(84), 671–704. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Augusto, M. R. A., & Corrêa, L. M. S. (2008). Genericity and bare nouns in the acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. In A. Gavarró & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp. 47–56). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Augusto, M. R. A., Corrêa, L. M. S., & Forster, R. (2012). An argument for DPs as phases in an integrated model of on-line computation: The immediate mapping of complex DPs with relative clauses. ReVEL, Special (6), 7–26. Retrieved from [URL]
Augusto, M. R. A., Ferrari-Neto, J., & Corrêa, L. M. S. (2006). Explorando o DP: A presença da categoria NumP [Exploring the DP: The presence of the NumP category]. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, 14(2), 245–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagno, M. (2011). Preconceito Linguístico: O que é, como se faz [Linguistic prejudice: What is it, how is it done?] (54a). Edições Loyola.Google Scholar
Chesi, C. (2015). On directionality of phrase structure building. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(1), 65–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka, & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language (pp. 1–52). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S. (2014). Interface information and computational cost: An integrated procedural approach to language acquisition with some implications for SLI. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M. J. Fritas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages: Selected proceedings of The Romance Turn V (pp. 2–34). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S., & Augusto, M. R. A. (2007). Computação Linguística no processamento on-line: Soluções formais para a incorporação de uma derivação minimalista em modelos de processamento [On-line computation in language processing: Formal solutions to the incorporation of minimalist derivation into speech processing models]. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos, 49(2), 167–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Possible loci of SLI from a both linguistic and psycholinguistic perspective. Lingua, 121(3), 476–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S., Augusto, M. R. A., & Ferrari-Neto, J. (2006). The early processing of number agreement in the DP: Evidence from the acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), BUCLD 30 Online Proceedings Supplement. Retrieved from [URL]
Costa, J., & Figueiredo Silva, M. C. (2006). Nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese: An argument for Distributed Morphology. In J. Costa & M. C. Figueiredo Silva (Eds.), Studies on agreement (pp. 25–46). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, S., & Espinal, M. T. (2020). On the syntax of number in Romance. Studia Linguistica, 74(1), 165–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, M. E. L. (2015). Para uma nova descrição da sintaxe do ‘português padrão’ [A new description of the syntax of ‘standard Portuguese’]. Cadernos de Letras Da UFF Dossiê: Variação Linguística e Práticas Pedagógicas, 51, 23–41.Google Scholar
Enç, M. (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.Google Scholar
Henry, A. (1998). Dialect variation, optionality, and the learnability guarantee. Linguistica Atlantica, 20, 51–71.Google Scholar
(2016). Acquiring language from variable input. Linguistic Variation, 16(1), 131–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubów, A. P. S. P. (2018). Language acquisition based on variable input: The case of number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.
Jakubów, A. P. S. P., & Corrêa, L. M. S. (2018). A expressão morfofonológica da concordância de número variável em português brasileiro: Uma proposta para a aquisição e a produção infantil [The morphophonological expression of variable number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: An account of preschoolers’ acquisition and production]. Revista Da ABRALIN, 1(45), 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019a). Variation under a psycholinguistic perspective: Number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese and the impact of schooling. Ilha Do Desterro, 72(3), 101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). Grammar identification based on variable input: On the production of number agreement by children acquiring Brazilian Portuguese. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2017 Language Acquisition and Development (pp. 11–30). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T., Baranowski, M., & Nagy, N. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 431–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcilese, M., Name, C., Augusto, M., Molina, D., & Armando, R. (2019). Mother-tongue education, linguistic variation and language processing. Ilha Do Desterro, 72(3), 17–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. L., & Schmitt, C. (2010). Effects of variable input in the acquisition of plural in two dialects of Spanish. Lingua, 120(5), 1178–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Variable input and the acquisition of plural morphology. Language Acquisition, 19(3), 223–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molina, D., Marcilese, M., & Name, C. (2017). Ora está, ora não está: Input variável e aquisição da flexão verbal de 3a pessoa do plural no PB [Now it is, now it is not: Variable input and 3rd person plural verbal inflection acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese]. Matraga, 24(41), 288–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naro, A. J. (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language, 57(1), 63–98. Retrieved from: [URL]
Naro, A. J., & Scherre, M. M. P. (2015). Drifting toward the standard language: A panel study of number concord in Brazilian Portuguese. In R. T. Cacoullos, N. Dion, & A. Lapierre (Eds.), Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory (pp. 149–194). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pereira, B. K. (2016). Feature interpretability and the positions of 2nd person possessives in dialectal Brazilian Portuguese. Filologia e Lingüística Portuguesa, 18(2), 199–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & W. Wilkins (Eds.), Clausal and phrasal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation: In Honor of Joseph E. Emonds (pp. 262–294). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, M. C. (2017). A note on the locus and function of formal gender. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 6(1), 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T. (1999). Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, J. (1994). On two types of underspecification: Towards a feature theory shared by syntax and phonology. Probus, 6(2–3), 207–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherre, M. M. P. (1978). A regra de concordância de número no sintagma nominal em português [Number agreement rule in the nominal phrase in Portuguese] (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.
(1991). A concordância de número nos predicativos e nos particípios passivos [Number agreement on predicatives and passive participles]. Organon, 18, 52–70.Google Scholar
Scherre, M. M. P., & Naro, A. J. (2006). Mudança sem mudança: A concordância de número no português brasileiro [Change without change: number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese]. Scripta, 9(18), 107–129.Google Scholar
Yang, C. D. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar