Cover not available
Part of
L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: The view from Romance
Edited by Larisa Avram, Anca Sevcenco and Veronica Tomescu
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 65] 2021
► pp. 133–170

Chapter 6
Assessing children’s syntactic proficiency through a sentence repetition task

A comparison between cochlear implanted children and typically developing children

| Ca’Foscari University of Venice
| Ca’Foscari University of Venice
Cochlear implants (CIs) can provide proper linguistic input to children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, despite an early diagnosis and intervention, and the development of lexical skills and speech perception similar to typically developing age peers, children with CIs still show a delay in the processing of movement-derived structures. Following previous studies on deaf or hard-of-hearing Hebrew-speaking children, this study provides first data on the repetition of movement-derived syntactically complex structures in Italian-speaking children with CIs. Results showed that children with CIs performed poorer than their typically developing age peers and showed many difficulties in all the structures characterised by a complex derivation. Interestingly, both groups showed difficulties in the production of relative clauses.
Keywords: complex syntactic structures, sentence repetition task, children, hearing loss, cochlear implants
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntactic properties of the structures analysed
    • 2.1Left dislocated sentences containing a resumptive clitic pronoun
    • 2.2Cleft sentences
    • 2.3Long-distance wh-questions
    • 2.4Oblique and genitive relative clauses
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2The task
    • 3.3Response coding
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Left dislocated sentences containing resumptive clitic pronouns
    • 4.2Cleft sentences
    • 4.3Long distance wh-questions
    • 4.4Relative clauses
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.65.06dor
References (71)
References
Adani, F. (2011). Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. (1999). Italian/Romance clitics: Structure and derivation. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 543–580). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). The CP of clefts. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 33, 191–204.Google Scholar
Benincà, P., Salvi, G., & Frison, L. (1988/2001). L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate [The order of the elements in sentences and marked structures]. In L. Renzi, G. Salvi, & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione [Complete Italian grammar] (Vol. 1, pp. 115–225). Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Varuzza, C., Giuliani, A., & Burdo, S. (2012). Cochlear implant in the second year of life: Lexical and grammatical outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 382–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, C. (1999). A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica, 53(1), 40–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1990). Types of Ā-dependencies. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contemori, C., & Garraffa, M. (2010). Comparison of modalities in SLI syntax: A study on the comprehension and production of non-canonical sentences. Lingua, 120(8), 1940–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Ortenzio, S., & Volpato, F. (2020). How do Italian-speaking children handle wh-questions? A comparison between children with hearing loss and children with normal hearing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(4), 407–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2004). Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., Rowland, C., & Theakston, A. (2009). The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 571–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J. (1995). Empty categories and complex sentences: The case of wh-questions. In Handbook of child language (pp. 508–540). Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Villiers, J., de Villiers, P., & Hoban, E. (1994). The central problem of functional categories in English syntax of oral deaf children. In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Constraints on language acquisition: Studies of atypical children (pp. 9–47). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
De Villiers, J., Roeper, T., & Vainikka, A. (1990). The acquisition of long-distance rules. In L. Frazier & J. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 257–297). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian: The minimal chain principle. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M., Arduino, L., Ciccarelli, L., & Job, R. (1999). Parsing strategies in children comprehension of interrogative sentences. In S. Bagnara (Ed.), European Conference on Cognitive Science. Conference Proceedings (pp. 301–308). Istituto di Psicologia del CNR.Google Scholar
Del Puppo, G., Volpato, F., Padovani, R., Zavattiero, P., & Lusuardi, A. (2016). Valutare la competenza sintattica di bambini con Disturbo Specifico del Linguaggio [Assessing syntactic competence in children with Specific Language Impairment]. Poster presented to Giornate CLASTA VII (Communications and Language Acquisition Studies in Typical and Atypical Populations), Calambrone, PI.
Demuth, K. (1984). Aspects of Sesotho language acquisition. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., Caselli, M. C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J., & Bates, E. (2007). A crosslinguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 759–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donati, C. (2002). Sintassi elementare [Basic syntax]. Carocci.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2007). Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain & Language, 101, 50–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Szterman, R. (2006). Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 56–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The comprehension and production of wh-questions in deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 212–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fryauf-Bertschy, H., Tyler, R. S., Kelsay, D. M., Gantz, B. J., & Woodworth, G. G. (1997). Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: The influences of age at implant and length of device use. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(1), 183–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grillo, N. (2008). Generalized minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia. LOT.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (1993). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., & Arosio, F. (2012). Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 185–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., Vernice, M., Barbieri, L., & Arosio, F. (2015). Language disorders in children with developmental dyslexia. In S. Stavrakaki (Ed.), Specific language impairment. Current trends in research (pp. 35–55). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., & Cardinaletti, A. (2003). Relative clauses formation in Romance child’s production. Probus, 15(1), 47–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hupet, M., & Tilmant, B. (1989). How to make young children produce cleft sentences. Journal of Child Language, 16, 251–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. (2004). Question formation in French SLI: Is movement costly? Paper presented at Groningen Workshop on the L1 Acquisition of Tense, Aspect, and Questions, June 11, University of Groningen.
(2005). The language faculty: (Ab)normal development and interface constraints. Paper presented at GALA 2005, 8–10 September, University of Siena.
(2011). Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French. Lingua, 121(3), 339–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labelle, M. (1990). Predication, wh-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lempert, H., & Kinsbourne, M. (1980). Preschool children’s sentence comprehension: Strategies with respect to word order. Journal of Child Language, 7, 371–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonini, C. (2006). The acquisition of object clitics and definite articles: Evidence from Italian as L2 and L1 (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Siena.
Marnane, V., & Ching, T. Y. (2015). Hearing aid and cochlear implant use in children with hearing loss at three years of age: Predictors of use and predictors of changes in use. International Journal of Audiology, 54(8), 544–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Bernstein, J. (1998). How children’s relative solve a problem for minimalism. Language, 74, 308–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Most, T., & Peled, M. (2007). Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 350–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., & Wimmer, E. (2018). Deficits in comprehending wh-questions in children with hearing loss – The contribution of phonological short-term memory and syntactic complexity. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(3), 267–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruigendijk, E., & Friedmann, N. (2017). A deficit in movement-derived sentences in German-speaking hearing-impaired children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J. (2012). Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 318–343.Google Scholar
Szterman, R., & Friedmann, N. (2015). Insights into the syntactic deficit of children with hearing impairment from a sentence repetition task. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Generative approaches to language acquisition 2013 (pp. 492–505). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, R. (2009). Acquisition at the interfaces: A case study on object clitics in early Italian (PhD dissertation). Utrecht University, LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1995). Training sentence production in agrammatism: Implications for normal and disordered language. Brain & Language, 50(2), 201–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C., & Shapiro, L. (2005). Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology, 19(10–11), 1021–1036. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R., & Crain, S. (1994). Successful cyclic movement. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 215–252). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. J. (1991). Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Connecticut.
Verhagen, A. (2006). On subjectivity and ‘long distance wh-movement’. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Various paths to subjectivity (pp. 323–346). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volpato, F. (2010). The acquisition of relative clauses and phi-features: Evidence from hearing and hearing-impaired populations (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
(2012). The comprehension of relative clauses by hearing and hearing-impaired, cochlear-implanted children: The role of marked number features. In S. Ferré, P. Prévost, L. Tuller, & R. Zebib (Eds.) Selected proceedings of the Romance Turn IV workshop on the acquisition of Romance languages (pp. 306–325). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2019). Relative clauses, phi feature, and memory skills. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Verbal working memory resources and comprehension of relative clauses in children with cochlear implants. First Language, 40(4), 390–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volpato, F., & D’Ortenzio, S. (2018). Ask a question! How Italian children with cochlear implants produce subject and object wh-questions. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, 20(2), 53–76.Google Scholar
Volpato, F., & Vernice, M. (2014). The production of relative clauses by Italian cochlear-implanted and hearing children. Lingua, 139, 39–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
World Medical Association. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Volpato, Francesca
2023. Valutazione della competenza linguistica e intervento Osservazioni sulle modalità e sugli strumenti disponibili . In Valutazione linguistica in italiano e nella LIS e strategie di intervento , DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.