Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 289–304

Chapter 12
Conclusions

| University of Graz
| University of Vienna | Austrian Academy of Sciences
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Emergence of derived lexemes and derivational patterns
  • 3.Emergence of neologistic derivations and productivity
  • 4.Other aspects of the development of derivational morphology
    • 4.1Preferences in derivational morphology
    • 4.2Word classes
    • 4.3Semantic categories of early derivations
    • 4.4(Potential) Productivity in CS
    • 4.5Complexity
  • 5.Relations between CDS and CS
  • 6.Summary and outlook
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.66.12mat
References (56)
References
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F. & Theakston, A. 2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42(2): 239–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anglin, J. 1993. Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58(10): 1–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berko, J. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14(2–3): 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. 1988. Word class distinctions in developing grammars. In Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, Y. Levy, I. M. Schlesinger & M. Braine (eds), 45–72. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2004. Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 3], R. A. Berman (ed.), 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. 2002. The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. 1982. Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (eds), 319–346. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1998. Children’s first verbs in Tzeltal: Evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics 36: 713–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, E. & Maratsos, M. 1984. “Spooning” and “basketing”: Children’s dealing with accidental gaps in the lexicon. Cognitive Development 55: 893–902.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5): 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. 1988. Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. 1998. Verbs in early lexical and syntactic development in Korean. Linguistics 36: 755–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. 1982. The young word maker: A case study of innovation in the child’s lexicon. In Language Acquisition. The State of the Art, E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (eds), 390–425. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 65]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Adult offer, word-class, and uptake in early lexical acquisition. First Language 30: 250–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Acquisition of derivational morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 424–439. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2016. The Lexicon in Acquisition, 3rd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Berman, R. A. 1984. Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language 60(3): 542–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. First language acquisition. In Morphologie / Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / An international Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan & S. Skopeteas (eds), 1795–1805. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Hecht, B. 1982. Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12(1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cordes, A.-K. 2014. The Role of Frequency in Children’s Learning of Morphological Constructions. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Ketrez, F. N. & Kilani-Schoch, M. (eds) 2017. Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E. & Korecky-Kröll, K. 2012. Acquisition of German diminutive formation and compounding in a comparative perspective: Evidence for typology and the role of frequency. In Current Issues in Morphological Theory:(Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322], F. Kiefer, M. Ladányi & P. Siptár (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Libben, G. & Korecky-Kröll, K. 2014. Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov & E. Moravcsik (eds), 181–196. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elsen, H. & Schlipphak, K. 2015. Word-formation in first language acquisition. In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 3, P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 2117–2137. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Boroditsky, L. 2001. Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (eds), 215–256. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 1992. Language Experience and Early Language Development: From Input to Uptake. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1996. Word-class changing inflection and morphological theory. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauschke, C. 2007. Erwerb und Verarbeitung von Nomen und Verben (Acquisition and Processing of Nouns and Verbs). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S., Ravid, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Laaha, G. & Dressler, W. U. 2006. Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default? Journal of Child Language 33: 271–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G. 2014. The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31: 8–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. 1963. Die Ableitung desubstantivischer Verben mit Nullmorphem im Französischen und die entsprechenden Verhältnisse im Englischen und Deutschen (The derivation of denominal verbs with zero-morpheme in French and the respective relations in English and German). Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur (Journal of French Language and Literature) 73(3–4): 164–179.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J., Guttropf, A. & Scherer, C. 2004. Dynamic aspects of German -er-nominals: A probe into the interrelation of language change and language acquisition. Linguistics 42(1): 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. 2007. Later Language Development: School-age Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Panagl, O. 2019. Wortbildung und Textsorte: Verbalabstrakta in der spät(er)en Latinität (Word formation and Text type: Verbal abstracts in the later Latinity). Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 59: 387–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rainer, F. 2014. Polysemy in derivation. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 338–353. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. 2004. Derivational morphology revisited: Later lexical development in Hebrew. In Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 3], R. A. Berman (ed.), 53–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., Keuleers, E. & Dressler, W. U. 2020. Emergence and early development of lexicon and morphology. In Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon, V. Pirrelli, I. Plag & W. U. Dressler (eds), 593–633. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Salerni, N., Assanelli, A., D’Odorico, L. & Rossi, G. 2007. Qualitative aspects of productive vocabulary at the 200- and 500-word stages: A comparison between spontaneous speech and parental report data. First Language 27: 75–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U. 2007. The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, C. 2011. Polysemy and productivity in German. STUF 64(1): 41–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skalička, V. 1979. Typologische Studien (Typological Studies). Braunschweig: Vieweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Studies of Child Language Development, C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (eds), 175–208. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Watson.Google Scholar
1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 1157–1256. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snow, C. 1995. Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In The Handbook of Child Language, P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (eds), 180–193. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swan, D. 2000. How to build a lexicon: A case study of lexical errors and innovations. First Language 20: 187–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardif, T. 1996. Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology 32(3): 492–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolchinsky, L. 2004. The nature and scope of later language development. In Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 3], R. A. Berman (ed.), 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2): 61–82.Google Scholar
Vogel, P. 2000. Grammaticalisation and part-of-speech systems. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, P. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds), 259–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Forshaw, William
2022. Book Review: Veronica Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler (Eds.), The acquisition of derivational morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective. First Language 42:5 ► pp. 696 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.