Cover not available
Part of
Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 67–92

Definiteness and argument position in the interpretation of bare nouns

From L1 Mandarin to L2 English

| Yale University
| Yale University
| The Graduate Center, City University of New York
| The Graduate Center, City University of New York
| The Graduate Center, City University of New York
We investigate the hypothesis that nouns in article-less languages are unambiguous with respect to definiteness, an unambiguity that is evident in the interpretation of ungrammatical “bare” or article-less singular nouns in L2 English. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that bare nouns in L2 English are interpreted as definite, administering an acceptability judgment task to intermediate L2 learners of English whose native language is Mandarin. We used sentences containing bare singular nouns in different syntactic positions and discourse contexts. We found bare subjects to be most acceptable in contexts that required definites, while bare objects were acceptable across contexts. Bare nouns in L2 English are argued to be unambiguous, following a systematic pattern determined by argument position and discourse context. 
Keywords: articles, definiteness, L2 acquisition, bare nouns, subject-object asymmetries
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1A look at (in)definiteness in article-less languages
    • 1.2Diagnosing (in)definiteness in English
    • 1.3The (in)definiteness of Mandarin bare nouns
    • 1.4The role of syntactic position
  • 2.Articles in second language acquisition
    • 2.1L2 article acquisition from the perspectives of AH and UH
    • 2.2Article omission in L2 development: Systematicity vs. randomness
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Predictions
    • 3.3Analyses
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overall acceptability of bare nouns
    • 4.2Acceptability of bare nouns by discourse context and syntactic position
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Definiteness and the singular-plural distinction
    • 5.2Definiteness and topicality
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.03ste
References (55)
References
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The information load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). A computational investigation of reference: Bridging the product and action traditions. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use. Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 285–301). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Almor, A., & Nair, V. A. (2007). The form of referential expressions in discourse. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1, 84–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brisson, C. (1997). On definite plural NP’s and the meaning of all. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings of 7th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT VII) (pp. 55–72). Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Plurals, all, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 129–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1995). Speakers, hearers and communication: Explorations in discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G. N. (1977). A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 413–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. (2019). Ordinal – Regression models for ordinal data. R Package. Retrieved on 19 October 2019 from [URL]Google Scholar
Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax. Sage.Google Scholar
Dayal, V. (1999). Bare NPs, reference to kinds and incorporation. In T. Matthews & D. Strolovitch (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory 9, 35–51. CLC Publications.Google Scholar
(2004). Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 393–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 123–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Determining (in)definiteness in the absence of articles. In V. Hohaus & W. Rothe (Eds.), Proceedings of TripleA, 3 (pp. 85–99).  Tübingen University Press.Google Scholar
(2018). (In)definiteness without articles: Diagnosis, analysis, implications. In G. Sharma & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Trends in Hindi linguistics (pp. 1–26). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayal, V., & Jiang, L. J. (2021). The puzzle of anaphoric bare nouns in Mandarin: A counterpoint to index! Linguistic Inquiry, 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enç, M. (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.Google Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Prosodic transfer: L1 effects on the production of L2 determiners. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 213–224). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y.-k. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts.
(2011). Definiteness and indefiniteness. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: A handbook of natural language meaning. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huang, H. (2018). Revisiting pseudo-incorporation: Post-verbal non-referential bare NPs in Mandarin. In W. G. Bennett, L. Hracs, & D. R. Storoshenko (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 203–213). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Karoma.Google Scholar
(1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35, 141–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language Learning, 60, 877–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenks, P. (2018). Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry, 49, 501–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L. J. (2012). Nominal arguments and language variation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University.
(2018). Definiteness in Nuosu Yi and the theory of argument formation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 41, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, & M. B. K. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 277–322). Mathematisch Centrum Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, P. N. (1999). Pragmatic halos. Language, 75, 522–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, J., & Syrett, K. (2017). Experimental evidence for the discourse potential of bare nouns in Mandarin. In A. Lamont & K. Tetzloff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 47thannual North East Linguistics Society (NELS) (Vol. 2, pp. 231–240). GLSA.Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package (1.4.4). Retrieved on 24 February 2022 from [URL]Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 459–489). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liu, M., & Keusch, F. (2017). Effects of scale direction on response style of ordinal rating scales. Journal of Official Statistics, 33(1), 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, S. (1985). Definites. Journal of Semantics, 4, 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Master, P. (1987). A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
Parrish, B. (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37, 361–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved on 24 February 2022 from [URL]
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, L., & Giménez, M. J. (1998). The L2 acquisition of definite determiners: From null to overt. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, & H. Walsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 640–650). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime (2.0). [Computer software and manual]. Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schönenberger, M. (2014). Article use in L2 English by L1 Russian and L1 German speakers. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 33, 77–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12, 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, F. (2013). Maximality and definite plurals – Experimental evidence. In E. Chemla, V. Homer, & G. Winterstein (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17 (pp. 509–526). Ecole Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2018). An introduction to mixed models for experimental psychology. In D. H. Spieler & E. Schumacher (Eds.), New methods in cognitive psychology. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2007). Variability in L2 article production: Beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23, 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Accounting for patterns of article omissions and substitutions in second language production. In R. Hawkins & M. P. G. Mayo (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 115–143). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, D., & Hentschel, J. (2013). CaMLA English Placement Test (EPT) forms D-F: Development report. CaMLA.Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 129–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Different? Yes. Fundamentally? No. Definiteness in the L2 English of Mandarin speakers. In R. Slabakova, J. Rothman, P. Kempchinsky, & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007), 251–261. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Yang, R. (2001). Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University.
Zdorenko, T., & Paradis, J. (2011). Articles in L2 English: When L1 and L2 acquisition meet at the interface. First Language, 32, 38–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar