Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition: Studies in honour of Susanne E. Carroll
Edited by Lindsay Hracs
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 69] 2024
► pp. 54–87

Chapter 3
Acquisition of morpho-syntactic features in a bilingual Italian child

An integrated approach to gender

| University of Wuppertal
| University of Wuppertal
| University of Wuppertal
The present study investigates the interaction of gender with (declension) class in the acquisition data of one bilingual child (from two to five years old) who develops Italian as a weak language in combination with German in Germany. As reported in the literature, the Italian child acquires gender with ease, reflected in the nearly exceptionless target-like gender marking on determiners. Of the two possible errors, omission and commission, the Italian child vastly omits determiners. Nouns are inflected according to (declension) classes in adult Italian, most of which correspond to one gender. If the gender feature can be derived by class, as proposed by Lowenstamm (2007) for adult French, a different and integrated approach to gender acquisition is possible.
Keywords: bilingual first language acquisition, Italian, gender feature, declension classes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gender, number, and declension class in Italian
    • 2.1Gender acquisition in Italian
  • 3.Parameter hierarchies in language acquisition
    • 3.1Parameter hierarchies in language acquisition: Declension classes in Italian
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1The Italian-German child Ja_di
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Classes I and II
    • 5.2Class III
    • 5.3Classes IV, V, VI, and VII
    • 5.4Classes VIII and IX
    • 5.5Summary of the Italian data
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.69.03dau
References (79)
References
Acquaviva, P. 2009. The structure of the Italian declension system. In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes, F. Montermini, G. Boyé & J. Tseng (eds), 50–62. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Antelmi, D. 1997. La prima grammatica italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Arencibia Guerra, L. 2008. Sprachdominanz bei bilingualen Kindern mit Deutsch und Französisch, Italienisch oder Spanisch als Erstsprachen. PhD dissertation, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Rankin, J. 1979. Morphological development in Italian: Connotation and denotation. Journal of Child Language 6(1): 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A. & Pizzamiglio, L. 1996. Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics 58(7): 992–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazalgette, T. O. 2015. Algorithmic Acquisition of Focus Parameters. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Benati, A. 2004. The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness 13(2): 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, G. 2013. Gender in Italian-German bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(3): 538–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I. & Sheehan, M. 2014. Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, F. J. Newmeyer & L. B. Preston (eds), 103–127. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C. 2014. What principles and parameters got wrong. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. C. Picallo (ed.), 155–178. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boloh, Y. & Ibernon, L. 2010. Gender attribution and gender agreement in 4‑ to 10-year-old French children. Cognitive Development 25(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bottari, P., Cipriani, P. & Chilosi, A.-M. 1993/1994. Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition 3(4): 327–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantone, K. F. 2007. Code-switching in Bilingual Children. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantone, K. F., Kupisch, T., Müller, N. & Schmitz, K. 2008. Rethinking language dominance in bilingual children. Linguistische Berichte 215: 307–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caprin, C. & Guasti, M. T. 2009. The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: A cross-sectional study. Applied Psycholinguistics 30(1): 23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E. 1989. Second language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning 39(4): 535–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(1): 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bello, A., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S. & Pasqualetti, P. 2015. Il primo vocabolario del bambino: Gesti, parole e frasi. Valori di riferimento fra 8 e 36 mesi delle Forme complete e delle Forme brevi del questionario MacArthur-Bates CDI. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Leonard, L. B., Volterra, V. & Campagnoli, M. G. 1993. Toward mastery of Italian morphology: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Child Language 20(2): 377–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chini, M. 1995a. Genere grammaticale e acquisizione. Aspetti della morfologia nominale in italiano L2. Milano: Francoangeli.Google Scholar
1995b. Grammatiche a confronto: La categoria grammaticale del genere nella competenza di nativi italofoni e nelle interlingue di apprendenti dell’italiano come L2. In L’universo delle lingue. Confrontare lingue e grammatiche nella scuola, Quaderni del Giscel, P. Desideri (ed.), 277–294. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
1998. Genuserwerb des Italienischen durch deutsche Lerner. In Eine zweite Sprache lernen, H. Wegener (ed.), 39–60. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language?: Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (eds), 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, P., Chilosi, A. M., Bottari, P. & Pfanner, L. 1993. L’acquisizione della morfosintassi in ita-liano: Fasi e processi. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Gender, grammatical. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, K. Brown (ed.), 749–756. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Martino, M., Bracco, G. & Laudanna, A. 2011. The activation of grammatical gender information in processing Italian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(4–6): 745–776. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Thornton, A. M. 1996. Italian nominal inflection. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 55–57, 1–24.Google Scholar
Eichler, N. 2011. Code-Switching bei bilingualen Kindern. Eine Analyse der gemischtsprachlichen Nominalphrasen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Genus. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Eichler, N., Hager, M. & Müller, N. 2012. Code-switching within the DP and gender assignment in bilingual children: French, Italian, Spanish and German. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 122(3): 227–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eichler, N., Jansen, V. & Müller, N. 2013. Gender in French-German, Italian-German, Spanish-German and Italian-French children. International Journal of Bilingualism 17(5): 550–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ezeizabarrena, M-J. & Garcia, F. I. 2018. Length of utterance, in morphemes or in Words? MLU3-w, a reliable measure of language development in early Basque. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 2265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2005. A Syntactic Analysis of the Nominal Systems of Italian and Luganda: How Nouns Can Be Formed in the Syntax. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Fey, S. 2020. Der Genuserwerb am Beispiel eines trilingualen Kindes: Spanisch, Italienisch und Französisch im Vergleich. Bachelor’s thesis, University of Hamburg.
Gudmundson, A. 2010. L’acquisizione del genere grammaticale in italiano L2. Stockholm: US-AB.Google Scholar
Hager, M. 2014. Der Genuserwerb bei mehrsprachig aufwachsenden Kindern – Eine longitudinale Untersuchung bilingualer und trilingualer Kinder der Sprachenkombinationen deutsch-französisch/italienisch/spanisch, französisch-italienisch/spanisch und deutsch-spanisch-katalanisch. PhD dissertation, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
Hauser-Grüdl, N., Arencibia Guerra, L., Witzmann, F., Leray, E. & Müller, N. 2010. Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual children: Can input frequency account for it? Lingua 120(11): 2638–2650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A. & Roberts, I. 2014. Parameters and the three factors of language design. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, C. M. Picallo (ed.), 61–81. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanova-Sullivan, T. & Sekerina, I. A. 2019. Distributional regularity of cues facilitates gender acquisition: A contrastive study of two closely related languages. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, M. M. Brown & B. Dailey (eds), 311–323. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. & Faussart, C. 1998. Gender agreement in the processing of spoken French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27(6): 597–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. 2009. Definite Markers, Phi Features and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Kupisch, T. 2006. The Acquisition of Determiners in Bilingual German-Italian and German-French Children. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Müller, N. & Cantone, K. F. 2002. Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Comparing Italian and French. Lingue e Linguaggio 1(1): 107–149.Google Scholar
Lampitelli, N. 2010. Nounness, gender, class and syntactic structures in Italian nouns. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen 2008, B. Bok-Bennema, B. Kampers-Mahne & B. Hollebrandse (eds), 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Caselli, M. C. & Devescovi, A. 2005. Italian children’s use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years. First Language 22(3): 287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, G. 2006. A minimalist program for parametric linguistics? In Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huybregts, U. Kleinhenz & J. Koster (eds), 407–414. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. 2018. Gender from Latin to Romance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. 2007. On little n, ROOT, and types of nouns. In The Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, J. Hartmann, V. Hegedus & H. V. Riemsdijk (eds), 105–143. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2012. Feminine and gender, or why the feminine profile of French nouns has nothing to do with gender. In Linguistic Inspirations. Edmund Gussmann In Memoriam, E. Cyran, H. Kardela & B. Szymanek (eds), 371–406. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1978. The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 43(1/2): 1–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. & Chalkley, M. A. 1980. The internal language of children’s syntax: The nature and ontogenesis of syntactic categories. In Children’s Language, Vol. II, K. E. Nelson (ed.), 127–214. New York NY: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2007. The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics 28(3): 495–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. E. 1986. The Acquisition of Gender: A Study of English and German. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N., Arnaus Gil, L., Eichler, N., Geveler, J., Hager, M., Jansen, V., Patuto, M., Repetto, V. & Schmeißer, A. 2015. Code-Switching: Spanisch, Italienisch, Französisch. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Müller, N., Kupisch, T., Schmitz, K. & Cantone, K. F. 2011. Einführung in die Mehrsprachigkeitsforschung: Deutsch, Französisch, Italienisch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. 2004. Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook, P. Pica (ed.), 181–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2017. Where, if anywhere, are parameters? A critical historical overview of parametric theory. In On Looking into Words (and Beyond), C. Bowern, L. Horn & R. Zanuttini (eds), 547–569. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Padovani, R. & Cacciari, C. 2003. Il ruolo della trasparenza morfologica delle parole in Italiano. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 4: 749–771.Google Scholar
Pérez-Tattam, R., Ezeizabarrena, M. J., Stadthagen-González, H. & Mueller Gathercole, V. C. 2019. Gender assignment to Spanish pseudowords by monolingual and Basque-Spanish bilingual children. Languages, 4(3), 58, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, C. M. 2014. Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pillunat, A. 2007. Der Erwerb des Lexikons durch mehrsprachige Kinder: Französisch, Italienisch und Deutsch im Vergleich. Master’s thesis, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. 1992. The acquisition of Italian morphology: Implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language 19(3): 491–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. 2017. Distributional learning of subcategories in an artificial grammar: Category generalization and subcategory restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language 97: 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, S. 2013. Der Erwerb des Adjektivs bei bilingual deutsch-italienischen Kindern. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 2019. Parameter Hierarchies & Universal Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmeißer, A., Hager, M., Arnaus Gil, L., Jansen, V., Geveler, J., Eichler, N., Patuto, M. & Müller, N. 2016. Related but different: The two concepts of language dominance and language proficiency. In Language Dominance in Bilinguals: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement, C. Silva-Corvalán & J. Treffers-Daller (eds), 36–65. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., Minkov, M., Dieser, E., Protassova, E., Moin, V. & Polinsky, M. 2014. Acquisition of Russian gender agreement by monolingual and bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(6): 726–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serianni, L. 1988. Grammatica italiana. Suoni forme costrutti. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Smith, N. & Law, A. 2009. On parametric (and non-parametric) variation. Biolinguistics 3(4): 332 – 343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stahnke, J. 2022. The Acquisition of French Determiners by Bilingual Children: A Prosodic Account. Languages 7: 200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teschner, R. & Russell, W. 1984. The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: An inversed dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics 1(1): 115–132.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. M. 2003. L’assegnazione del genere in italiano. In Actas del XXIII Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románica, Vol. I, F. Sánchez Miret (ed.), 467–481. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Constraining gender assignment rules. Language Sciences 31(1): 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. M., Iacobini, C. & Burani, C. 1997. BDVDB. Una base di dati sul Vocabolario di Base della lingua italiana. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Tuite, K. 1997. Svan. Languages of the World / Materials. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Yip, V. & Matthews, S. 2006. Assessing language dominance in bilingual acquisition: A case for mean length utterance differentials. Language Assessment Quarterly 3(2): 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar