Cover not available
Part of
Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 88–110

Chapter 4
Second language acquisition of English plurals by Chinese learners

| 1University of Bradford
| 2University of Sheffield
Previous research supported the proposal that multiplicity inferences (i.e., the more than one interpretation) associated with English plural morphology are scalar implicatures (Tieu et al., 2014). The current study extends the research to second language (L2) acquisition by testing Chinese-speaking learners of English. Using a Truth Value Judgment Task (TVJT) adapted from Tieu et al. (2014), we compared the interpretations of English bare plurals among Chinese adult learners and native English speakers. Results indicate that the interpretive pattern of Chinese learners closely aligns with that of the English controls’. This supports the universality of scalar implicatures in L2 and does not provide direct evidence for L1 transfer through morpheme mapping from English plural morpheme -s to Chinese plural morpheme -men.
Keywords: L2 acquisition, multiplicity inference, English plural morphology, scalar implicature
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Plurality, scalar implicature, and L1 transfer
    • 2.1English bare plurals and the scalar implicature approach
    • 2.2Adult L2 acquisition of scalar implicature
    • 2.3Plurality in Chinese and L1 transfer through morpheme-to-morpheme mapping
      • 2.3.1Men plurals
      • 2.3.2Bare nouns
  • 3.Research question and hypotheses
  • 4.Experiment
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Task design and procedure
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.04liu
References (42)
References
Alexiadou, A. (2011). Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, A. Sawyer, & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 33–41). Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [URL]
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 118(1), 84–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, J. (2021). Crosslinguistic influence on L2 implicature computation for determiners. Journal of Second Language Studies, 5(1), 86–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). Scalar implicatures in adult L2 learners: A self-paced reading study. Second Language Research, 40(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., et al. (2018). Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9, 314–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, D., & de Swart, H. (2010). The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics & Pragmatics, 3(6), 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English (Doctoral dissertation, UCLA. [URL]
Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivlieva, N. (2013). Scalar implicatures and the grammar of plurality and disjunction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Jiang, L. J. (2017). Mandarin associative plural -men and NPs with -men. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 4(2), 191–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kane, F., Tsoulas, G., Folli, R., Alexopoulou, T., & Romoli, J. (2015). A scalar implicature-based account of the inference of pluralized mass (and count) nouns. In Proceedings of CLS 51 (pp. 317–331). Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kim, K., & Melchin, P. B. (2018). On the complementary distribution of plurals and classifiers in East Asian classifier languages. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M. (1995). Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 398–411). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Križ, M. (2017). Bare plurals, multiplicity, and homogeneity (Manuscript). Institut Jean Nicod. Rtrieved on 15 May 2024 from [URL]
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. H. A. (1999). Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8 (1), 75–99. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. (2020). On the semantics of suffix -men and NP-men in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Lexical Semantics, 11831, 88–800. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. & Gil, K. H. (2022). The interpretation of Chinese plurals: Experimental evidence by Chinese children and adults. In Y. Gong & F. Kpogo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 483–496). Cascadilla Press. [URL]
Martí, L. (2020). Inclusive plurals and the theory of number. Linguistic Inquiry, 51(1), 37–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayr, C. (2015). Plural definite NPs presuppose multiplicity via embedded exhaustification. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 25, 204–224. LSA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzaggio, G., Panizza, D., & Surian, L. (2021). On the interpretation of scalar implicatures in first and second language. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 62–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller D, Giancaspro D, Iverson M, Rothman J, & Slabakova, R. (2016). Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. In A. A. de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela, & C. Martinez Sanz (Eds.), Language acquisition beyond parameters: Studies in honor of Juana M. Liceras (pp. 125–145). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munn, A., Zhang, X., & Schmitt, C. (2009). Acquisition of plurality in a language without plurality. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarró, & J. Solà (Eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition. Oxford Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition, 78, 168–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renans, A., Romoli, J., Makri, M., Tieu, L., de Vries, H., Folli, R., & Tsoulas, G. (2018). The abundance inference of pluralised mass nouns is an implicature: Evidence from Greek. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(3), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renans, A., Sağ, Y., Ketrez, F. N., Tieu, L., Tsoulas, G., Folli, R., de Vries, H., & Romoli, J. (2020). Plurality and crosslinguistic variation: An experimental investigation of the Turkish plural. Natural Language Semantics, 28, 307–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rullmann, H., & You, A. (2006). Chinese general number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in Mandarin. In H. Rullmann & A. You (Eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics (pp. 175–196). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, U. (2003). A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13, (pp. 258–275). LSA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, U., Andersen, J., & Yatsushiro, K. (2005). The plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 413–434). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2000). L1 transfer revisited: The L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics, 38(4), 739–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120, 2444–2462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snape, N., & Hosoi, H. (2018). Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 163–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spector, B. (2007). Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp. 243–281). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieu, L., Bill, C., Romoli, J., & Crain, S. (2014). Plurality inferences are scalar implicatures: Evidence from acquisition. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 24, 122–136. LSA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsoulas, G. (2009). On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics 57 (pp. 131–146). MITWPL.Google Scholar
Zhang, N. N. (2014). Expressing number productively in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics, 52(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, S., Ren, J., Frank, M. C., & Zhou, P. (2021). The development of quantity implicatures in Mandarin-speaking children. Language Learning and Development, 17(4), 343–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zweig, E. (2009). Number-neutral bare plural and the multiplicity implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32, 353–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar