Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2018) ► pp.209–230

Benefactive and malefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min

| National Chung Cheng University
This paper aims to investigate both Fagerli’s (2001) proposal that in serializing languages benefactive and malefactive constructions often involve the morpheme denoting ‘give’, and Radetzky & Smith’s (2010) proposal that East and South Asian languages often involve different morphemes or structures in expressing benefaction or malefaction. Checking the proposals against benefactive and malefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min (TSM) which involve optional benefactee and malefactee, this paper shows that both proposals find only partial support from TSM data. TSM uses the morpheme denoting ‘give’, i.e. hoo, in the malefactive construction involving optional malefactee, but not the benefactive construction involving optional benefactee, which involves the use of ka. Moreover, ka can also be used for introducing the malefactive. Even though the hoo malefactive construction and the ka benefactive construction have different structures, the constructions involving ka, no matter whether denoting benefaction or malefaction, have the same syntactic structure.
Keywords: Taiwan Southern Min, benefactive construction, malefactive construction, ka construction, hoo construction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Semantics of benefactive/malefactive
      • 2.1.1Types of benefactive
      • 2.1.2Types of malefactive
    • 2.2Benefactive/malefactive morphemes/constructions
      • 2.2.1Languages of Europe
      • 2.2.2Languages of Asia
    • 2.3On hoo
    • 2.4On ka
  • 3.Benefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min
  • 4.Malefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min
  • 5.The proposal
    • 5.1Malefactive
      • 5.1.1Malefactive ka-construction
      • 5.1.2Malefactive hoo-construction
    • 5.2Benefactive ka-construction
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 15 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00008.lin
References (39)
References
Abraham, Roy C. (ed.). 1962. Dictionary of modern Yoruba. 2nd edn. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd & Imre, Samu (eds.). 1972. The Hungarian language. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 1986. Formal and colloquial adversity passives in Standard Chinese. Linguistics 24(6). 1025–1052. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Dialect grammar in two early modern Southern Min texts: A comparative study of dative kît 乞, comitaive câng 共and diminutive -guìa 仔. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28(2). 247–302.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary & Peyraube, Alain. 2006. The analytic causatives of early modern Southern Min in diachronic perspective. In Ho, Dah-an & Cheung, H. Samuel & Pan, Wuyun & Wu, Fuxiang (eds.), Linguistic studies in Chinese and neighboring languages: Festschrift in honor of Professor Pang-Hsin Ting on his 70th birthday, vol. 21, 973–1011. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L. -S. & Huang, C. -T. James & Li, Y. -H. Audrey & Tang, C. -C. Jane. 1999. Hoo, hoo, hoo: Syntax of the causative, dative, and passive constructions in Taiwanese. In Ting, Pang-Hsin (ed.), Contemporary studies on the Min dialects (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 14), 146–203. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cheng, Robert L. 1985. A comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin. Language 61(2). 352–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding (Studies in Generative Grammar 9). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2010. Benefactive applicative periphrases: A typological approach. In Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (Typological Studies in Language 92), 29–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagerli, Ole Torfinn. 2001. Malefactive by means of GIVE . In Simonsen, Hanne Gram & Endresen, Rolf Theil (eds.), A cognitive approach to the verb: Morphological and constructional perspectives (Cognitive Linguistics Research 16), 203–222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Wan-chuan & Huang, Ching-wen (eds.). 1995. Dajia Zhen Minnanyu gushi ji (yi) [Dajia Township collection of Southern Min stories, vol. 11]. Fengyuan: Taichung County Cultural Center.Google Scholar
(eds.). 1997. Qingshui Zhen Minnanyu gushi ji (er) [Qingshui Township collection of Southern Min stories, vol. 21]. Fengyuan: Taichung County Cultural Center.Google Scholar
Hu, Wan-chuan & Wang, Cheng-hsiung (eds.). 1999. Da-an Xiang Minnanyu gushi ji (san) [Da-an Township collection of Southern Min stories, vol. 31]. Fengyuan: Taichung County Cultural Center.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Zúñiga, Fernando. 2010. Introduction: Benefaction and malefaction from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (Typological Studies in Language 92), 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1974. Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: Verbs or prepositions? Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2(3). 257–278.Google Scholar
1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Huei-Ling. 2011. Pure unaccusatives with Hoo I in Taiwan Southern Min. Lingua 121(14). 2035–2047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A non-uniform analysis of ka7 constructions in Taiwan Southern Min. Language and Linguistics 13(4). 743–766.Google Scholar
. 2016. Non-disposal ka in Taiwan Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 1–27.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsu-Lin. 2005. Minnanhua h‘geiyu’ de benzi jiqi yufa gongneng de laiyuan [The origin of Southern Min h‘give’ and the source of its grammatical function]. In Ho, Dah-an & Tzeng, Ovid J. -L. (eds.). POLA FOREVER: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang on his 70th birthday, 163–173. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education in Taiwan. 2008. Taiwan Minnanyu luomazi pinyin fuhao fangan shiyong shouce [User guide of Taiwan Southern Min romanization proposal]. 2nd edn. Taipei: Ministry of Education in Taiwan. ([URL]). (Accessed 2016-01-04.)
. 2008–2011. Taiwan Minnanyu changyongci cidian [Taiwan Southern Min dictionary of common words]. ([URL]) (Accessed 2016-01-04.)
Ogawa, Akio. 1997. On the syntax and semantics of the German dative. In Matsumura, Kazuto & Tooru, Hayasi (eds.), The dative and related phenomena, 1–30. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobô.Google Scholar
Peng, Guozhen & Chappell, Hilary. 2011. Ya33 ‘give’ as a valency increaser in Jinghpo nuclear serialization: From benefactive to malefactive. Studies in Language 35(1). 128–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Radetzky, Paula & Smith, Tomoko Yamashita. 2010. An areal and cross-linguistic study of benefactive and malefactive constructions. In Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (Typological Studies in Language 92), 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, E. C. 1969. Teach yourself Yoruba. London: The English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1996. Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account. In Shibatani, Masayoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 157–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Tomoko Yamashita. 2005. Affectedness constructions: How languages indicate positive and negative events. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Takami, Ken-ichi. 2003. A semantic constraint on the benefactive double object construction. English Linguistics 20(1). 197–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teng, Shou-hsin. 1982. Disposal structures in Amoy. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy 53(2). 331–352.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2007. Four types of affective constructions in Chinese. (Paper presented at the 5th Workshop on Formal Syntax and Semantics (FOSS-5) & the Taiwan Languages and Teaching Conference, Kaohsiung, 21–22 April 2007.)
Tsao, Feng-fu. 2003. Taiwan Minnanyu de ka ziju. [On ka sentences in Taiwan Southern Min]. In Dai, Zhao-ming (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Chinese Dialect Grammar, 114–136. Harbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Pei-chuan. 1997. Lun gudai Hanyu zhong jizhong chuzhishi zai fazhan zhong de fen yu he [On the development of various disposal constructions in ancient Chinese]. In Tseng, Chiu-yu (ed.), Zhongguo jingnei yuyan ji yuyanxue disiji: Yuyan leixing [Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China] (Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philosophy, Academia Sinica, No. 2), 555–594. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Yang, Hsiu-fang. 1991. Taiwan Minnanyu yufa gao [A draft for a grammar of Taiwanese Southern Min]. Taipei: Daan Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Yi
2024. Cognitive and sociolectal constraints on the theme-recipient alternation: evidence from Mandarin. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.