Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:3 (2018) ► pp.377–394

也論漢語「主語指向型」動補結構的句法構造 (On subject-oriented resultatives in Mandarin)

| Capital Normal University
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong
漢語「主語指向型」動補結構一直被學界看作是動補結構的「例外」。本文著重研究了這類動補結構的句法語義特點，利用多種句法手段證明「主語指向型」動補結構內部存在差異，即有些並不屬於動補結構，有些表面上看似「主語指向」的動補結構其實是基礎動補結構的衍生結構，在底層結構中這類補語仍是指向賓語。這一分析不僅維持了關於動補結構的統一分析理論（如 DOR 理論），而且為現代漢語的動補結構提供了跨語言的分析視角。
Keywords: 「主語指向型」動補結構, DOR 理論, 心理動詞, 雙動詞結構, 致使
Article outline
  • 1.漢語「主語指向型」動補結構是不是「例外」？
  • 2.「主語指向型」動補結構的內部差異
  • 3.「主語指向型」動補結構的特點
  • 4.「主語指向型」動補結構的句法構造
  • 5.結語
  • 謝辭
  • 筆記
  • 縮寫表
  • 參考文獻
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Article language: Chinese

Published online: 4 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00013.bi
References (37)
參考文獻
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 18). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (Current Studies in Linguistics 24), 53–109. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 391). Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, Yuanjian （何元建） & Wang, Lingling （王玲玲）. 2009. Zailun binyu zhixiangxing dongjieshi de jiegou 再論賓語指向型動結式的結構 [A new view on the object-oriented verb-resultative structure]. In Editorial Committee of Yuyanxue Luncong, Center for Chinese Linguistics PKU (北京大學漢語語言學研究中心 《語言學論叢》 編委會) (ed.), Yuyanxue Luncong 語言學論叢 [Essays on Linguistics], vol. 391, 360–399. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Larson, Richard K. & Iatridou, Sabine & Lahiri, Utpal & Higginbotham, James (eds.), Control and grammar, 109–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 2531. 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Li, Audrey & Simpson, Andrew & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, 1–48. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 26). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Chao. 2008. Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Where syntax, semantics, and pragmatics meet. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei. 1990. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8(2). 177–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jimmy. 2004. Event structure and the encoding of arguments: The syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang （呂叔湘） (ed.). 1980. Xiandai Hanyu babai ci 現代漢語八百詞 [Eight hundred words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhen （馬真） & Lu, Jianming （陸儉明）. 1997. Xingrongci zuo jieguo buyu qingkuang kaocha 形容詞作結果補語情況考察（三） [The study of the adjectives as resultatives III]. Hanyu Xuexi 漢語學習 [Chinese Language Learning] 1997(6). 7–9.Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 1998. Thematic hierarchy, causative hierarchy, and Chinese resultative verb compounds. (Paper presented at the Annual Research Forum of the Linguistic Society of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 5–6 December 1998.)
Pan, Haihua （潘海華） & Han, Jingquan （韓景泉）. 2008. Hanyu baoliu binyu jiegou de jufa shengcheng jizhi 漢語保留賓語結構的句法生成機制 [The syntactic mechanism of retained object constructions in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2008(6). 511–522.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Binding problems with experiencer verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 18(1). 126–140.Google Scholar
. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades (Current Studies in Linguistics 27). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 2008. Introducing arguments (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 49). Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Yang （沈陽） & Sybesma, Rint （司馬翎）. 2010. Jufa jiegou biaoji “gei” he dongci jiegou de yansheng guanxi 句法結構標記「給」和動詞結構的衍生關係 [The derivational relation between the syntactic marker gei (給) and several verbal constructions]. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2010(3). 222–237.Google Scholar
. 2012. Zuoge dongci de xingzhi he zuoge jiegou de gouzao 作格動詞的性質和作格結構的構造 [On the nature of unaccusatives and unaccusative structures]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 世界漢語教學 [Chinese Teaching in the World] 2012(3). 306–321.Google Scholar
Shi, Chunhong （施春宏）. 2008. Dongjieshi “V-lei” de jufa yuyi fenxi jiqi lilun yunhan 動結式「V累」的句法語義分析及其理論蘊涵 [The syntactic and semantic analysis of the VRC “V-lei (累)” and its theoretic implication]. Yuyan Kexue 語言科學 [Linguistic Sciences] 7(3). 242–258.Google Scholar
Shibagaki, Ryosuke. 2009. Affected roles and linking in Mandarin resultatives. In Brooke, Julian & Coppola, Gregory & Görgülü, Emrah & Mameni, Morgan & Mileva, Emma & Morton, Susan & Rimrott, Anne (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on East Asian Linguistics, n. p. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shibata, Natsumi & Sudo, Yasutada & Yashima, Jun. 2007. On apparent DOR violations in Chinese and Japanese resultative compounds. (Paper presented at GLOW in Asia VI, Hong Kong, 27–29 December 2007.)
Simpson, Jane. 1983. Resultatives. In Levin, Lori & Rappaport, Malka & Zaenen, Annie (eds.), Papers in lexical-functional grammar, 143–157. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Sun, Tianqi （孫天琦） & Haihua, Pan （潘海華）. 2012. Yetan Hanyu bujiwu dongci daibinyu xianxiang: jianlun xinxi jiegou dui Hanyu yuxu de yingxiang 也談漢語不及物動詞帶「賓語」現象 – 兼論信息結構對漢語語序的影響 [On the phenomenon of intransitive verbs taking objects: The influence of information structure on word order in Mandarin]. Dangdai Yuyanxue 當代語言學 [Contemporary Linguistics] 14(4). 331–342.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 44). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Cornelia Maria. 1997. Contextually-dependent lexical semantics. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 1997. Resultative predicates and control. In Blight, Ralph C. & Moosally, Michelle J. (eds.), The syntax and semantics of predication: Proceedings of the 1997 Texas Linguistics Society Conference (Texas Linguistic Forum 38), 307–321. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira Jean. 1980. The tonal phonology of Chinese. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2007. A syntactic account of the direct object restriction in Chinese. Language Research 43(1). 53–75.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi （朱德熙）. 1982. Yufa jiangyi 語法講義 [Lectures on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xingfan （朱行帆）. 2005. Qingdongci he Hanyu bujiwu dongci dai binyu xianxiang 輕動詞和漢語不及物動詞帶賓語現象 [Light verb syntax of intransitives containing objects]. Xiandai Waiyu 現代外語 [Modern Foreign Languages] 2005(3). 221–231.Google Scholar