Cover not available
Article published In:
Sound, Form, and Meaning of Chinese Dialects
Edited by Ik-sang Eom
[Language and Linguistics 20:1] 2019
► pp. 46–84

Interactions between prosody and morphosyntax in Fuzhou VO phrases

| The Chinese University of Hong Kong
This study examines how tone sandhi domains (TSDs) are determined in Fuzhou. The data include: (i) regular verb-object phrases (VOs) where the verb takes a direct bare noun object; and (ii) non-canonical VOs where the verb takes an adverbial expression as a surface object.
Several observations are made. First, a three-way sandhi exists within every TSD. All antepenultimate syllables neutralize to low tones. A penultimate syllable’s sandhi tone is dependent on the final syllable’s citation tone, which remains unchanged. Second, in regular VOs, a monosyllabic verb consistently forms a single TSD with its direct bare noun object, but a disyllabic verb and its object are separated into two TSDs. Third, in non-canonical VOs, a monosyllabic verb never forms a single TSD with its adverbial object. Three questions are raised. First, what is the nature of each TSD? Second, why does the number of syllables in a verb determine the distinct TSDs formed in regular VOs? Third, how can we account for the different patterns of TSD formation in two types of VOs?
We propose that each TSD equals to a prosodic word (PrWd). OT analyses are provided to show how PrWds are derived. The analysis of regular VOs relies on the ranking of a prosodic markedness constraint ft bin above the word-level interface correspondence constraints. The contrast between two types of VOs is explained by applying the model of Multiple Spell-Out and a cyclic interaction of morphosyntax and prosody. This approach is new in explaining the TSDs that are constrained by morphosyntax.
Keywords: tone sandhi domain, prosodic word, morphosyntax-prosody interaction, Fuzhou, VO phrases
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language background
    • 2.1Data sources and transcription conventions
    • 2.2Fuzhou tonal system and diagnostics for TSDs
  • 3.The formation of TSDs in Fuzhou VOs
    • 3.1Verbs with direct bare noun objects
      • 3.1.1Monosyllabic verbs with direct bare noun objects
      • 3.1.2Disyllabic verbs with direct bare noun objects
    • 3.2Verbs with non-canonical/adverbial objects
    • 3.3Summary
  • 4.The prosodic nature of TSDs
    • 4.1Fuzhou prosodic categories established in previous literatures
    • 4.2Prosodic word as the domain for tone sandhi
      • 4.2.1The structure of the prosodic word
      • 4.2.2Prosodic constraints on the structures of the prosodic words
  • 5.Interaction of constraints on the formation of prosodic words
    • 5.1The formation of prosodic words in regular VOs
    • 5.2The formation of prosodic words in non-canonical VOs
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00029.che
References (49)
References
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930. A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 451. 24–27.Google Scholar
Chan, Marjorie K. M. 1985. Fuzhou phonology: A non-linear analysis of tone and stress. Seattle: University of Washington. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Chan, Lily. 1998. Fuzhou tone sandhi. San Diego: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. 1987. The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 41. 109–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zeping. 2010. Shijiu shiji yilai de Fuzhou fangyan [ Fuzhou dialects since 19th century ]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Hale, Kenneth & Kenstowicz, Michael (eds.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dai, Xiang-ling. 1992. Chinese morphology and its interface with the syntax. Columbus: The Ohio State University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Duanmu, San, 2004. Left-headed feet and phrasal stress in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 33(1). 65–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The tone-syntax interface in Chinese: Some recent controversies. In Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium Cross-linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena, Historical Development, Tone-syntax Interface, and Descriptive Studies, 221–254. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2012. Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Epstein, S. David & Seely, T. Daniel. 2002. Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Epstein, S. David & Seely, T. Daniel (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1990. Intrinsic F0 in tense and lax vowels with special reference to German. Phonetica 471. 99–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In Kiparsky, Paul & Youmans, Gilbert (eds.), Rhythm and meter, 201–260. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2003. Weak layering and word binarity. In Honma, Takeru & Okazaki, Masao & Tabata, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Shin-Ichi (eds.), A new century of phonology and phonological theory: A Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 26–65. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Jiang-King, Ping. 1995. An optimality account of tone-vowel interaction in Fuzhou. In Suzuki, Keiichiro & Elzinga, Dirk (eds.), Proceedings of the 1995 Southwestern Workshop on Optimality Theory (SWOT), 89–118. Tucson: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
. 1996. An optimality account of tone-vowel interaction in Northern Min. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 1999. Tone-vowel interaction in optimality theory (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 16). Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. 1985. Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kager, Rene. 1999. Optimality theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika & Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spell-out: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 241. 93–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress s and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 81. 249–336.Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 2014. Light verbs. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 73–99. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Rulong & Liang, Yuzhang & Zou, Guangchun & Chen, Zeping. 1994. Fuzhou fangyan cidian [Fuzhou dialect dictionary]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Li, Rong & Feng, Aizhen. 1998. Fuzhou fangyan cidian [Fuzhou dialect dictionary]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 2008. Generalized alignment: Prosody. In McCarthy, John J. (ed.), Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, 167–177. [URL]) (Accessed 2018-06-11) DOI logo
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1982. Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. 11, 225–255. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1987. Kimatuumbi phrasal phonology. Phonology Yearbook 41. 13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick: The Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University. (Technical Report.)Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1974. French liaison and the X̄ notation. Linguistic Inquiry 5(4). 573–590.Google Scholar
. 1981. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Fretheim, Thorstein (ed.), Nordic prosody II：Papers from a symposium, 111–140. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 31. 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In Horne, Merle (ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiments, 231–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The prosodic structure of function words. In McCarthy, John J. (ed.), Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, 464–482. ([URL]) (Accessed 2018-06-11)
. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In Goldsmith, John & Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth & Shen, Tong. 1990. Prosodic domains in Shanghai Chinese. In Inkelas, Sharon & Zec, Draga (eds.), The phonology-syntax connection, 313–337. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Xinyuan. 2012. Tone sandhi of prosodic word in Suzhou Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong. (M. Phil. thesis.)Google Scholar
Shen, Xiaonan Susan. 1993. Relative duration as a perceptual cue to stress in Mandarin. Language and Speech 361. 415–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew & Wu, Zoe. 2002. Understanding cyclic spell-out. In Hirotani, Masako (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 32 , 499–518. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA.)Google Scholar
Šurkalović, Dragana. 2015. The No-Reference Hypothesis: A modular approach to the syntax-phonology interface. Tromsø: University of Tromsø (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Epstein, S. David & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Working minimalism. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Martha Susan. 1983. A metrical approach to tone sandhi in Chinese dialects. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Zhao, Linbin. 2015. Fuzhouhua shiyong zidian [Practical Fuzhou dictionary]. Shanghai: Shanghai Dictionary Press.Google Scholar