Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 20:4 (2019) ► pp.515534
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Edward
1974Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact as seen through Nepali and Newari verb tenses. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 3(1). 42–59.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: Functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(4). 309–325.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2002Conjunct/disjunct systems in Barbacoan languages. In Castillo, Jeannie (ed.), Proceedings from the fourth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 11), 3–12. Santa Barbara: UCSB, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte
2014Volition and control in Wadu Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 75–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon
2018Egophoricity and argument structure in Cha’palaa. In Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila (eds.), Egophoricity, 269–304. Amsterdam: Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila
(eds.) 2018Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Edward & Bateman, Leah
2007Symbiosis between documentary linguistics and linguistic pragmatics. In Austin, Peter K. & Bond, Oliver & Nathan, David (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, 83–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren
2013Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2017Egophoric evidentiality in Bodish languages. In Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 61–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Trail, R. L. (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics, vol.71, 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren
2017The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality. In Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 1–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2012Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 83–116.Google Scholar
2014Clause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 264–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016aComplementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 39(2). 222–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Japhug. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 614–634. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton & Lai, Yunfan & Nima, Lobsang
2017Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing
2003Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale 32(2). 245–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd & Mazaudon, Martine & Michaud, Alexis & Guillaume, Séverine & François, Alexandre & Adamou, Evangelia
2014Documenting and researching endangered languages: The Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81. 119–135.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth
2017Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186–1871. 120–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robin
2012The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16(1). 111–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2000Parallelisms in the Verb Morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.Google Scholar
2003Caodeng rGyalrong. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018Evidentials and person. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1996L’ergativité en tibétain [Ergativity in Tibetan]. Louvain: Péeters.Google Scholar
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/ ‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Huber, Brigitte & Volkart, Marianne & Widmer, Paul (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag [Chomolangma, Demawend and Kasbek: Festschrift for Roland Bielmeier on his 65th birthday], 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Driem, George
1993A grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel & Zemp, Marius
2017The epistemization of person markers in reported speech. Studies in Language 41(1). 33–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yukawa, Yasutoshi
1971Chibettogo no jutsubu no rinkaku [Outline of Tibetan predicates]. Gengogaku no kihon mondai [Basic problems in linguistics], 178–204. Tokyo: Taishūkan Shoten.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Drolma, Dawa & Hiroyuki Suzuki
Zhou, Yang & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2022. Evidentiality in Selibu. Diachronica 39:2  pp. 268 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.