Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:2 (2020) ► pp.175–212

Uvulars and uvularization in Tangut phonology

| CRLAO-INALCO
Tangut, a mediaeval Qiangic language (Sino-Tibetan family) distinguishes three grades (děng 等). The traditional Sofronov-Gong reconstruction of this distinction postulates different degrees of medial yod: Grade I {-Ø-}, Grade II {-i-}, Grade III {-j-}. The yods, however, are not supported by the transcriptional evidence. Based on cognates between Tangut and Rgyalrongic languages, this study proposes the uvularization hypothesis: Tangut syllables have contrastive uvularization. Grade I/II syllables are uvularized, while Grade III syllables are plain. For phonological velars, uvularized syllables trigger a uvular allophone, while plain syllables trigger a velar allophone. Tangut uvularization is an instance of a common typological feature in Qiangic languages, that of Guttural Secondary Vocalic Articulations (GSVA), variously termed uvularization, velarization, tenseness, or Retracted Tongue Root (RTR). Recognizing Tangut grades as a case of Qiangic GSVA has far-ranging potential consequences for Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics.
Keywords: Tangut, Qiangic languages, uvularization, Guttural Secondary Vowel Articulation
Article outline
  • 1.Reconstruction of Tangut phonology: State of the art
  • 2.Grades in Tangut phonology
    • 2.1Establishing grades in Tangut
    • 2.2Traditional values given to Tangut grades
    • 2.3Tibetan, Sanskrit and Chinese transcription evidence does not support -i- for Grade II
    • 2.4Tibetan and Sanskrit transcription evidence does not support -j- for Grade III
  • 3.Uvular initials in Tangut
    • 3.1Tangut grade corresponds to Japhug Rgyalrong velar/uvular distinction
    • 3.2Exceptions to the correspondence
  • 4.The uvularization hypothesis
    • 4.1Uvulars in Tangut
    • 4.2Guttural Secondary Vocalic Articulations in Qiangic languages
    • 4.3The uvularization hypothesis
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Qiangic GSVA vs. classical cases of phonological tongue root position
    • 5.2Uvularized vowels from compression of uvular elements
    • 5.3Reconsidering the transcription evidence under the uvularization hypothesis
      • 5.3.1A possible orthographical device in the Tibetan transcription for Tangut uvulars
      • 5.3.2Grade-III syllables with <-y-> in Tibetan transcription
      • 5.3.3The curious case of R.19 = 20
    • 5.4Elimination of -j- and pre-Tangut
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00060.gon
References (76)
References
Arakawa, Shintaro. 2004. On the Sanskrit-Tangut phonetic transcription rule: A study of “dhāraṇī” in the Buddhist texts. In Lin, Ying-chin & Hsu, Fang-min & Lee, Chun-chih & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Yang, Hsiu-fang & Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W4), 499–514. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. 1992. A handbook of old Chinese phonology (Trends in linguistics: Studies and Monographs 64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casali, Roderic F. 2002. Nawuri ATR harmony in typological perspective. Journal of West African Languages 29(1). 3–43.Google Scholar
Chen, Li. 1884. Qieyunkao [A treatise on Qieyun]. (Panyu chenshi dongshu congshu III [Collected works of Chen Li]). Guangzhou: Rongjing Zhushi Zhai.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia. 2012. The Qiangic subgroup from an areal perspective: A case study of languages of Muli. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 133–170.Google Scholar
Coblin, W. South. 2007. A handbook of ’Phags-pa Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan P. & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Chiu, Chenhao & Liou, Michelle. 2016. Uvular approximation as an articulatory vowel feature. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 46(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galambos, Imre. 2015. Translating Chinese tradition and teaching Tangut culture: Manuscripts and printed books from Khara-Khoto. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, Yang. 2015. Description de la langue menya: Phonologie et syntaxe [Description of the Menya language: Phonology and syntax]. Paris: EHESS. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 1981. Shi’er shiji mo Hanyu de Xibei fangyin (shengmu bufen) [A Northwestern Chinese dialect at the end of the 12th century (part on initials)]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 52(1). 37–78.Google Scholar
. 1988. Phonological alternations in Tangut. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 59(3). 783–834.Google Scholar
. 1989a. The phonological reconstruction of Tangut through examination of phonological alternations. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 60(1). 1–45.Google Scholar
. 1989b. Shi’er shiji mo Hanyu de Xibei fangyin (yunwei wenti) [A northwestern Chinese dialect at the end of the 12th century (the problem of finals)]. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sinology: Section on Linguisitcs and Paleography, 145–190. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 1991. Leilin Xixiawen yiben Han-Xia duiyinzi yanjiu [A study on the Tangut transcription of Chinese in the Tangut translation of the Lei-lin]. In Sung, Wen-hsun & Li, Yih-yuan & Hsu, Cho-yun & Chang, Kwang-chih (eds.), Kaogu yu lishi wenhua: Qingzhu Gao Quxun xiansheng bashi dashou lunwenji [Archaeology and historical culture: Festschrift in honour of Kao Ch’u-hsun’s 80th birthday], vol. 21, 185–223. Taipei: Cheng Chung.Google Scholar
. 1993. Xixiayu de yinyun zhuanhuan yu goucifa [Phonological alternations and derivational morphology in Tangut]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 64(4). 935–968.Google Scholar
. 1994. A hypothesis of three grades and vowel length distinction in Tangut. Journal of Asian and African Studies 46–471. 305–314.Google Scholar
. 1995. The system of finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. In Wang, William S.-Y. (ed.), The ancestry of the Chinese language (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 8), 41–92. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California.Google Scholar
. 1997. Xixiayu rougan yunmu zhuanhuan de qiyuan—chongdie fuheci [A possible origin of certain Tangut syllable-final phonological alternations—reduplicated compounds]. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 41. 265–289.Google Scholar
. 2001. Xixiayu dongci de rencheng huying yu yinyun zhuanhuan [Personal agreements and phonological alternations in the Tangut verb]. Language and Linguistics 2(1). 21–67.Google Scholar
. 2002. Han-Zangyu yanjiu lunwenji [Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C2-2). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2003. Tangut. In LaPolla, Randy J. & Thurgood, Graham (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 602–620. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2007. Xixiayu zai Han-Zang yuyan bijiao yanjiu zhong de diwei [The position of Tangut in the comparative study of Sino-Tibetan languages]. Language and Linguistics 8(2). 447–470.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2014. Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1). 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Mantaro J. 1963. Tangūto-go (Seika-go) no “in” no soshiki ni tsuite [On the organization of rhymes in Tangut]. Toho Gakuho [Journal of Oriental Studies] 251. 83–105.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2010. An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(2). 110–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, Tan Pang. 2009. Guangxi Long Sheng Ling Hua yuyin de lishi cengci yanjiu [Study of the Longsheng (Guangxi) Linghua phonology and its historical strata]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Huang, Bufan. 1985. Muyayu gaikuang [Overview on Muya language]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 1985(3). 62–77.Google Scholar
. 2007. Lawurongyu yanjiu [Studies on the Lavrung language]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2007. Textes tangoutes I, Nouveau recueil sur l’amour parental et la piété filiale [Tangut texts I, New collection on parental love and filial piety]. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
. 2008. Jiarongyu yanjiu [Studies on the Rgyalrong language]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute [Sketch of Tangut historical phonology and morphogy]. Leiden: Global Oriental. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Dictionnaire Japhug-Chinois-Français [Japhug-Chinese-French dictionary], Version 1.1. ([URL]) (Accessd 2019-10-09.)
Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Nima, Lobsang. 2017. Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages. 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kepping, Ksenia B. 1990. Вновь собранные записи о любви к младшим и почтении к старшим [Records of love for the younger and reverence for the elders]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kim, Wan-Jin. 1963. Kugŏ moŭm ch’egye-ŭi sin’goch’al [An investigation of Korean vowel system]. Chindan Hakpo [The Chin-Tan Journal] 241. 63–99.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2011. Vowel contrast and vowel harmony shift in the Mongolic languages. Language Research 47(1). 23–43.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, Berthold. 1916. The Si-Hia language, a study in Indo-Chinese philology. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 17(1). 1–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Fanwen. 1994. Songdai xibei fangyin [The Northwestern dialect of the Song period]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Xia-Han zidian [Tangut-Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Xia-Han zidian [Tangut-Chinese dictionary]. Revised edn. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Xiangrong. 1993. Jiarongyu yanjiu [A study of the Rgyalrong language]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House.Google Scholar
Lin, Ying-chin. 2004. Houchuzhuangjing de Xixiayu yinyun xitong gouni [Ever-improving reconstructions for the phonological system of Tangut]. In Lin, Ying-chin & Hsu, Fang-min & Lee, Chun-chih & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Yang, Hsiu-fang & Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday, 457–482. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2006. Xixiayu yi “Zhenshi ming jing” shiwen yanjiu [Tangut version of “Chanting the names of Manjusri”] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A8). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lin, You-jing & Luo, Erwu. 2003. Chabao Jiarongyu Dazanghua de quxiang qianzhui ji dongci cigan bianhua [Directive prefixes and changes of verb stems in Dazang rGyalrong]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 41. 19–29.Google Scholar
Luo, Charngpeir. 1933. Tang Wudai xibei fangyin [The Northwestern dialects of Tarng and Five Dynasties] (The National Research Institute of History and Philology Monographs Series A12). Shanghai: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Miyake, Marc. 2012. Complexity from compression: A sketch of Pre-Tangut. In Popova, Irina F. (ed.), Тангуты в Центральной Азии: сборник статей в честь 80-летия проф. Е.И.Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: A collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov] 244–261. Moscow: Vostochnaja literature.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko & Prins, Marielle (eds.). 2012. rGyalrongic languages database. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-11-06.)
Nie, Hongyin. 1986. Xixia canjing zhuyin Zangwen de qianjiazi [Preinitials in phonetic glosses in Tibetan script in Tangut sutra fragments]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 1986(2). 58–69.Google Scholar
Nishida, Tatsuo. 1964. Seikago no kenkyū [A study of the Hsi-Hsia language], vol. 11. Tokyo: Zauho Kankokai.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1981. The Proto-Min finals. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Sinology: Section on Linguistics and Paleography, 35–73. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 1994. Pharyngealization in Early Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114(3). 397–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sang-suk. 1998. The Korean vowel shift revisited. Language Research 34(2). 445–463.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Xiu & Song, Qi. 1975. Xintangshu [New history of Tang]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Pan, Wuyun. 2000. Hanyu lishi yinyunxue [Chinese historical phonology]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
Park, Sun-woo. 2016. Han’gugo moŭmjohwa-ui yakhwa hyŏnsange taehan chŏngboiron kiban punsŏk [The diachronic declination of Korean vowel harmony from the perspective of information theory]. Umsong Umun Hyongt’aeron Yon’gu [Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology] 22(3). 453–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quan, Bao. 2015. Design and implementation of Cyrillic Mongolian syllable text corpus system. In Liu, Hsiang-Chuan & Sung, Wen-Pei & Yao, Wenli (eds.), Information, Computer and Application Engineering: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Application Engineering (ITCAE 2014), 327–332. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Ruiqing. 2017. Deng [Rank, grade, division]. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 21, 13–20. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shen, Zhongwei. 2007. Sino-Khitan phonology. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 1(2). 147–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sofronov, Mikhail V. 1968. Грамматика тангутского языка [Grammar of the Tangut Language] (21 volumes). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1980. Дэн и юнь в тангутской филологии [Deng and yun in Tangut philology]. In Yakhontov, Sergey Ye. (ed.), Разыскания по общему и китайскому языкознанию [Research in General and Chinese Linguistics], 198–208. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sofronov, Mikhail V. & Kychanov, Yevgeny I. 1963. Исследования по фонетике тангутского языка [Researches on Tangut phonetics]. Moscow: IBL.Google Scholar
Solonin, Kirill. 2015. Local literatures: Tangut/Xixia. In Silk, Jonathan A. & von Hinüber, Oskar & Eltschinger, Vincent (eds.), Brill encyclopedia of Buddhism, vol. 11 (Literature and Languages), 844–859. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sun, Bojun. 2010. Xixia Xinyi Fojing tuoluoni de duiyin yanjiu [A study of the transcriptions of Dharani in the new Tangut translation of Buddhist scriptures]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai. 2001. Lun Zangmian yuzu zhong de Qiangyuzhi yuyan [On language of the Qiangic branch in Tibeto-Burman]. Language and Linguistics 2(1). 157–181.Google Scholar
. 2004. Cihui bijiao: Cong cihui bijiao kan xixia yu de lishi diwei [Lexical comparison: The historical position of Tangut language from lexical comparison]. In Li, Fanwen (ed.), Xixiayu bijiao yanjiu [Comparative studies on Tangut], 256–351. Yinchuan: Ningxia People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2004a. Gong Huangcheng yuanshi tan Xixiayu yanjiu [Interviewing Academician Hwang-cherng Gong on his Tangut research]. Shengyun Luncong [Chinese Phonology] 131. 1–12.Google Scholar
2004b. Verb-stem variations in Showu rGyalrong. In Lin, Ying-chin & Hsu, Fang-min & Lee, Chun-chih & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Yang, Hsiu-fang & Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W4), 269–296. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Evans, Jonathan P. 2013. Mawo Qiangyu yuanyin yinxi zaitan [The vocalic system of Mawo Qiang revisited]. In Peng, Gang & Feng, Shi (eds.), Eastward flows the great river: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S.-Y. Wang on his 80th birthday, 135–151. Kowloon: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1985. Vowel harmony shift in Mongolian. Lingua 67(4). 283–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, Chung Pui. 2008. Xixiawen fojing canpian de Zangwen duiyin yanjiu [A study of Tibetan phonological transcription in Tangut Buddhism fragments]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Yasunori. 2011. Kitan transcriptions of Chinese velar initials. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 64(1). 13–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jingru. 1933. Lun Sichuan Qiang yu ji Mi yao yu yu Xixia yu [The Shishiah and the Ch’iang and Minia languages in Szuch’uan province]. Xixia yanjiu's [Shishiah studies] II1 (Monographs Series A11), 275–288. Pei-p’ing: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alexander. 1870. On an ancient Buddhist inscription at Keu-yung kwan, in North China. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (New Series) 5(1). 14–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfenden, Stuart N. 1931. On the Tibetan transcriptions of Si-Hia words. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (New Series) 63(1). 47–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sims, Nathaniel A.
2023. Vowel harmony in Rma: a diachronic perspective. Folia Linguistica 57:s44-s1 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2022. When internal reconstruction goes further: proposing the vowel system of Pre-Khroskyabs through examining bound state apophony. Folia Linguistica 56:s43-s1 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2023. Lenition alternation in West Gyalrongic and its implications for Southeast Asian panchronic phonology. Diachronica 40:3 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Jonathan
2022. Tangut uvularization and the devil in the Chinese details. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 23:2 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan, Xun Gong, Jesse P. Gates & Guillaume Jacques
2020. Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.