Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2020) ► pp.584–603

On the reflexive-possessive markers in the Dongxiang language

| CRLAO-INALCO
Dongxiang is a language mainly spoken in the Autonomous District of southwest Gansu Province, People’s Republic of China. The Dongxiang nationality (東鄉族), as they are officially called, represents about 300,000 speakers. The Dongxiang language is one of the peripheral Mongolic languages spoken in the Gansu-Qinghai area, also known as the Shirongol group. These languages have been isolated from the other Mongolic languages and have been influenced by the surrounding Chinese dialects to a greater or lesser degree. They have common typological forms inherited from Middle Mongolian as well as features which have been induced by language contact. In this paper, I shall discuss the reflexive possessive markers in the Dongxiang language with a special focus on the suffix -nugvun. I shall show that the functions and use of Dongxiang reflexive possessive markers -ni and -ne are similar to those of the common Mongolic markers *-ni and *-xAn. The reflexive possessive marker -nugvun seems to be found in Dongxiang only and its origin remains unclear. In sources available from the 1980s to the 2000s, it is found associated with a restrictive number of pronouns, nouns, and idiomatic expressions and is highly grammaticalized. However, in more recent sources, it is found associated with a greater number of nouns and seems to have more semantic implications. Moreover, it is also found in a role which could be associated with that of a pronoun, and which can receive a plural and reflexive morphology. Nugvun can be used completely independently and is probably a calque of the Chinese dialect of Linxia 個家ge42 jia243 . This shows that it is most probably an innovation developed from the original suffix.
Keywords: Dongxiang, reflexive markers, calque, Linxia, linguistic innovation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and context
  • 2.Reflexive possessive in the Mongolic languages
  • 3.Reflexive possession in the Dongxiang language
  • 4.Semantic value of marker -nugvun: A calque?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 18 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00071.lef
References (33)
References
Bao, Saren. 2006. Menggu yuzu Dongxiang yu yu Hanyu de jiechu yanjiu [Study on contact between the Mongolic language Santa and Chinese]. Beijing: Peking University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Buhe. 1986. Dongxiang yu he Menggu yu [The Dongxiang language and Mongolian language] (Mongolian Language Family Dialects Research Series 7). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
. 1987. Dongxiang yu huayu cailiao [Linguistic material of the Dongxiang language] (Mongolian Language Family Dialects Research Series 9). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Chen, Yuanlong. 2002. Dongxiang zu zizhixian Naleisi xiaoxue shuangyu jiaoxue shiyan ban shiyong jiaocai [Textbook for bilingual teaching experimental class of Narisi Primary School in the Dongxiang Autonomous County]. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Delige’erma & Bo, Sude. 2006. Menggu yuzu yu yan gailun [Introduction to the Mongolic languages]. Beijing: China Minzu University Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M. 1992. Altaic elements in the Linxia dialect: Contact-induced change on the Yellow River plateau. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20(1). 160–179.Google Scholar
É’erdengtei & Wuyundalai & Asalatu. 1980. Menggu mishi cihui xuan shi [Selected vocabulary of The secret history of the Mongols ]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Field, Kenneth L. 1997. A grammatical overview of Santa Mongolian. Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Georg, Stefan. 2003. Mongghul. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 286–306. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hashengerile. 2014. Dongxiang yu 366 ju huihua ju: Shaoshumingzuyu Han Ying Ri E duizhao [366 sentences for conversation in Dongxiang: Minority language translated in Chinese, English, Japanese and Russian]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 2003. Proto-Mongolic. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 1–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2007. Typological interaction in the Qinghai linguistic complex. Studia Orientalia 1011. 85–102.Google Scholar
Kim, Stephen S. 2003. Santa. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 346–363. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lanzhoudaxue Zhongwenxi Linxia Diaocha Yanjiu Zu [The Linxia dialect research group of the School of Chinese Languages and Literatures, Lanzhou University]. 1996. Linxia fangyan [The dialect of Linxia]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press.Google Scholar
Lefort, Julie. 2012a. Contacts de langues dans le Nord-Ouest de la Chine: Le cas du Dongxiang [Contact language in North-West Gansu: The case of Dongxiang]. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 2012b. New linguistic practices in Dongxiang: Moving toward the categorization of a youth language? Langage et société 1411. 71–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. Contact language in North-West Gansu: Chinese directional verbs structure calques in the Dongxiang language. In Cao, Guangshun & Djamouri, Redouane & Peyraube, Alain (eds.), Beifang Hanyu zhong de yuyan jiechu: Lishi yu gongshi yanjiu [Languages in contact in North China: Historical and synchronic studies] (Collection des Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale 13), 385–408. Paris: EHESS, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale.Google Scholar
. 2015b. Calquing, structural borrowing and metatypy in the Dongxiang language. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale [East Asian Languages and Linguistics] 44(2). 150–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Contact-induced change in the Dongxiang language: The emerging category of classifier. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale [East Asian Languages and Linguistics] 46(2). 174–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Zhaoxiong. 1981. Dongxiangyu jianzhi [Descriptions of Dongxiang]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ma, Bulin. 2017. Dongxiang yu cihui de lishi cengci [The history level of Dongxiang language vocabulary and the historical formation of Dongxiang language]. Yinchuan: North Minzu University. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Ma, Guozhong & Chen, Yuanlong (eds.). 2001. Dongxiangyu Hanyu cidian [Dongxiang-Chinese dictionary]. 1st edn. Lanzhou: Gansu Nationalities Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ma, Rubiao. 2016. Hua yi yi yu yu Dongxiang yu cihui tantao [A contrast of Hua-I-I-Yu and Dongxiang language vocabulary]. Language and Translation 2016(1). 41–45.Google Scholar
Nugteren, Hans. 2003. Shira Yughur. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 265–285. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. Mongolic phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu languages. Leiden: Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas. 1965. Introduction to Altaic linguistics. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sechenbaatar, Borjigin. 2003. The Chakhar dialect of Mongol: A morphological description (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 243). Helsinki: The Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Slater, Keith W. 2003a. A gammar of Mangghuer: A Mongolic language of China’s Qinghai-Gansu sprachbund. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
2003b. Mangghuer. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 307–324. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soulié, M. G. 1903. Éléments de grammaire mongole (dialecte ordoss). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Todaeva, Buljaš Xojčievna (Тодаева, Буляш Хойчиевна). 1961. Dunsyanskii yazyk (Дунсянский язык) [The Dongxiang language]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Vostočnoj Literatury (AN SSSR: Institut narodov Aziï).Google Scholar
Wu, Hugjiltu. 2003. Bonan. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 325–345. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yu, Zhihong. 1994. Cong Menggu mishi yuyan kan Dongxiang yu [Looking at the Dongxiang language from the perspective of The secret history of the Mongols ]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 1994(1). 17–22.Google Scholar