Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2020) ► pp.604–638

Causer and causee as two higher-ranked thematic roles

| The City University of New York
On the basis of the argument realization of Mandarin resultative verb compounds, this paper argues that the Proto-Agent properties as well as the Proto-Patient properties proposed by Dowty (1991) are not equal in status. Specifically, the Proto-Agent property corresponding to the Causer and the Proto-Patient property corresponding to the Causee are two higher-ranked properties. In a non-prototype approach to thematic roles, this means that the Causer and the Causee are two higher-ranked thematic roles that are immediately relevant to the argument realization of monotransitive causative predicates. The paper shows that, compared with Dowty’s equal-weight approach, the alternative approach recognizing the Causer and the Causee as two higher-ranked properties or roles can give a simpler, more effective, and more straightforward account of the argument realization associated with monotransitive causative predicates, including lexical causatives, morphological causatives, and resultatives. This study has implications for research in the argument realization of causatives involving three (or more) arguments as well. Meanwhile, it has implications for any theory utilizing thematic hierarchy because (i) none of the thematic hierarchies proposed in the literature includes both the Causer and the Causee and (ii) a complete theory of thematic roles needs to take these two higher-ranked roles into consideration.
Keywords: Causer, Causee, argument realization, causative, resultative, thematic hierarchy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Important evidence from Mandarin resultative verb compounds
  • 3.Towards a simpler account of the argument realization of monotransitive causative predicates
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 18 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00072.li
References (97)
References
Abbott, Miriam. 1991. Macushi. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 31, 23–160. Berlin & New York: De Mouton Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1974. Verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 51. 325–366.Google Scholar
. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex & Joshi, Smita. 1991. Parameters in causative constructions. In Dobrin, Lise M. & Nichols, Lynn & Rodriguez, Rosa M. (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–15. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1989. Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 20(4). 513–553.Google Scholar
Beavers, John. 2012. Resultative constructions. In Binnick, Robert I. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 908–933. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Rai, Manoj & Paudyal, Netra P. & Banjade, Goma & Bhatta, Toya N. & Gaenszle, Martin & Lieven, Elena & Rai, Ichchha Purna & Rai, Novel Kishore & Stoll, Sabine. 2010. The syntax of three-argument verbs in Chintang and Belhare (Southeastern Kiranti). In Malchukov, Andrej L. & Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 382–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Asudeh, Ash & Toivonen, Ida & Wechsler, Stephen. 2016. Lexical-functional syntax. 2nd edn. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Kanerva, Jonni M. 1989. Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1). 1–50.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Huang, C.-T. James. 1994. On the argument structure of resultative compounds. In Chen, Matthew Y. & Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (eds.), In honor of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, 187–221. Taipei: Pyramid.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 73(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 261–312. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In Pustejovsky, James (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon, 55–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Event structure in argument linking. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 21–63. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Anthony R. & Koenig, Jean-Pierre. 2000. Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language 76(1). 56–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1997. The theory of functional grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause. 2nd revised edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Order of subject, object and verb. In Haspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 330–333. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1970. Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi. 2006. On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over. Studia Linguistica 60(2). 121–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3). 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia M. 1975. Tracing the source of a lexical gap. In Saltarelli, Mario & Wanner, Dieter (eds.), Diachronic studies in Romance linguistics, 55–62. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
1976. Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gu, Yang. 1992. The syntax of resultative and causative compounds in Chinese. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th edn. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Iren & Haspelmath, Martin & Taylor, Bradley (eds.). 2013. Valency patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL]) (Accessed 2018-02-08.)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3). 535–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon. 2007. Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin resultatives: A lexical mapping account. Lingua 117(1). 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren & Lin, Fu-Wen. 1992. Composite event structures and complex predicates: A template-based approach to argument selection. In Stvan, Laurel Smith & Ryberg, Stephen & Olsen, Mari Broman & Macfarland, Talke & DiDesidero, Linda & Bertram, Anne & Adams, Larin (eds.), FLSM III: Papers from the Third Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, 90–108. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Chuugoku Gogaku [Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan] 2531. 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3). 369–411.Google Scholar
1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jake, Janice Lynn. 1983. Grammatical relations in Imbabura Quechua. Urbana & Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Kaili, Hasan & Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Georgalidou, Marianthi & Çeltek, Aytaç. 2009. Causative constructions in the Turkish variety of the bilingual Muslim community of Rhodes: A preliminary research. In Ay, Sıla & Aydın, Özgür & Ergenç, İclâl & Gökmen, Seda & İşsever, Selçuk & Peçenek, Dilek (eds.), Essays on Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 403–412. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of “subject.” In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 63–99.Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Davis, Anthony R. 2001. Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1). 71–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac & Polinsky, Maria. 1993. Causee and patient in the causative of transitive: Coding conflict or doubling of grammatical relations? In Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria (eds.), Causatives and transitivity (Studies in Language Companion Series 23), 177–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Grafmiller, Jason. 2013. Do you always fear what frightens you? In King, Tracy Holloway & de Paiva, Valeria (eds.), From quirky case to representing space: Papers in honor of Annie Zaenen, 21–32. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1991. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41(1–3). 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. The semantic determinants of argument expression: A view from the English resultative construction. In Guéron, Jacqueline & Lecarme, Jacqueline (eds.), The syntax of time, 477–494. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Chao. 2008. Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Where syntax, semantics, and pragmatics meet. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2009. On the argument realization of causatives. In Sutcliffe, Patricia & Stanford, Lois M. & Lommel, Arle R. (eds.), LACUS forum XXXIV: Speech and beyond, 137–146. Houston: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
. 2013. Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Simple syntax and complex thematic relations. Language Sciences 371. 99–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Argument realization of psychological verbs. Studies in Language 42(4). 755–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Linding. 1980. Dongbuge jushi [Sentence types containing the verb-complement construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1980(2). 93–103.Google Scholar
. 1984. Jiujing nage “bu” nage? [Which on earth complements which?]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1984(2). 1–10.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei. 1990. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8(2). 177–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(2). 255–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Cross-componential causativity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17(3). 445–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Huei-Ling. 1998. The syntax-morphology interface of verb-complement compounds in Mandarin Chinese. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Lin, Jimmy. 2004. Event structure and the encoding of arguments: The syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California at Irvine. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Liu, Mingming. 2014. Mandarin resultative verb compound involves VP complementation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1). ( Proceedings of the 37th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference ). 1–9. (Article 24.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2017-​08-16.)
López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Jianming. 1990. “VA le” shubu jiegou yuyi fenxi [A semantic analysis of VA-le verb-complement constructions]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1990(1). 1–6.Google Scholar
Ma, Xiwen. 1987. Yu dongjieshi dongci youguan de mouxie jushi [Certain syntactic structures related to resultative verb compounds]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1987(6). 424–441.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Geda. 2011. Causation and dominance: A study of Finnish causative verbs expressing social dominance. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77(4). 766–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system–an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229–290.Google Scholar
Salih, Mahmud Husein. 1985. Aspects of clause structure in Standard Arabic: A study in relational grammar. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Shi, Chunhong. 2008. Hanyu dongjieshi de jufa yuyi yanjiu [Syntactic and semantic studies of Chinese resultative verb compounds]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1991. Causatives and universal grammar: An alternative interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society 89(1). 65–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Causatives and causation: A universal-typological perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Suhandano. 1994. Grammatical relations in Javanese: A short description. Canberra: Australian National University. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 44). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1976. Semantic causative types. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 41–116. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1). 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tham, Shiao Wei. 2015. Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin. In Wang, William S-Y. & Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 306–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A case for lexical rules. Language 49(2). 361–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokunaga, Misato. 1997. External control in causatives of English and Japanese. In Melby, Alan K. (ed.), The Twenty-third LACUS Forum, 289–299. Chapel Hill: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2). 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Role and Reference Grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 707–741. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitale, Anthony J. 1981. Swahili syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Hongqi. 1996. Dongjieshi shubu jiegou de yuyi shi shenme [What is the semantics of the verb-complement construction]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1996(1). 24–27.Google Scholar
Wang, Lingling. 2001. A study of resultative constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2005. Complex causatives and verbal valence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 2014. Causal VVs in Mandarin. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 311–341. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Yulin. 2001. Shujieshi peijia de kongzhi–huanyuan fenxi [A control-reduction analysis of the valency of the verb-result construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2001(5). 399–410.Google Scholar