Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2020) ► pp.604–638

Causer and causee as two higher-ranked thematic roles

| The City University of New York

On the basis of the argument realization of Mandarin resultative verb compounds, this paper argues that the Proto-Agent properties as well as the Proto-Patient properties proposed by Dowty (1991) are not equal in status. Specifically, the Proto-Agent property corresponding to the Causer and the Proto-Patient property corresponding to the Causee are two higher-ranked properties. In a non-prototype approach to thematic roles, this means that the Causer and the Causee are two higher-ranked thematic roles that are immediately relevant to the argument realization of monotransitive causative predicates. The paper shows that, compared with Dowty’s equal-weight approach, the alternative approach recognizing the Causer and the Causee as two higher-ranked properties or roles can give a simpler, more effective, and more straightforward account of the argument realization associated with monotransitive causative predicates, including lexical causatives, morphological causatives, and resultatives. This study has implications for research in the argument realization of causatives involving three (or more) arguments as well. Meanwhile, it has implications for any theory utilizing thematic hierarchy because (i) none of the thematic hierarchies proposed in the literature includes both the Causer and the Causee and (ii) a complete theory of thematic roles needs to take these two higher-ranked roles into consideration.

Keywords: Causer, Causee, argument realization, causative, resultative, thematic hierarchy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Important evidence from Mandarin resultative verb compounds
  • 3.Towards a simpler account of the argument realization of monotransitive causative predicates
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 18 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00072.li
References
Abbott, Miriam
1991 Macushi. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 31, 23–160. Berlin & New York: De Mouton Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith
1974 Verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 51. 325–366.Google Scholar
2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex & Joshi, Smita
1991 Parameters in causative constructions. In Dobrin, Lise M. & Nichols, Lynn & Rodriguez, Rosa M. (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–15. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1989 Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 20(4). 513–553.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2012 Resultative constructions. In Binnick, Robert I. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 908–933. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
1988 Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2011 Grammatical relations typology. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Rai, Manoj & Paudyal, Netra P. & Banjade, Goma & Bhatta, Toya N. & Gaenszle, Martin & Lieven, Elena & Rai, Ichchha Purna & Rai, Novel Kishore & Stoll, Sabine
2010 The syntax of three-argument verbs in Chintang and Belhare (Southeastern Kiranti). In Malchukov, Andrej L. & Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 382–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Asudeh, Ash & Toivonen, Ida & Wechsler, Stephen
2016 Lexical-functional syntax. 2nd edn. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Kanerva, Jonni M.
1989 Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1). 1–50.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Huang, C.-T. James
1994 On the argument structure of resultative compounds. In Chen, Matthew Y. & Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (eds.), In honor of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, 187–221. Taipei: Pyramid.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975 Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 73(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976 The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 261–312. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991 Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1993 Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In Pustejovsky, James (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon, 55–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Event structure in argument linking. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 21–63. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2012 Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Anthony R. & Koenig, Jean-Pierre
2000 Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language 76(1). 56–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1978 Functional grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1997 The theory of functional grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause. 2nd revised edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2000 A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2005 Order of subject, object and verb. In Haspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 330–333. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1970 Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2006 On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over. Studia Linguistica 60(2). 121–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Jackendoff, Ray
2004 The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3). 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia M.
1975 Tracing the source of a lexical gap. In Saltarelli, Mario & Wanner, Dieter (eds.), Diachronic studies in Romance linguistics, 55–62. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B.
1990 Argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1965 Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
1976 Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gu, Yang
1992 The syntax of resultative and causative compounds in Chinese. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th edn. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Iren & Haspelmath, Martin & Taylor, Bradley
(eds.) 2013 Valency patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL]) (Accessed 2018-02-08.)
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3). 535–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon
2007 Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin resultatives: A lexical mapping account. Lingua 117(1). 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren & Lin, Fu-Wen
1992 Composite event structures and complex predicates: A template-based approach to argument selection. In Stvan, Laurel Smith & Ryberg, Stephen & Olsen, Mari Broman & Macfarland, Talke & DiDesidero, Linda & Bertram, Anne & Adams, Larin (eds.), FLSM III: Papers from the Third Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, 90–108. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
2006 Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Chuugoku Gogaku [Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan] 2531. 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1987 The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3). 369–411.Google Scholar
1990 Semantic structures. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jake, Janice Lynn
1983 Grammatical relations in Imbabura Quechua. Urbana & Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Kaili, Hasan & Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Georgalidou, Marianthi & Çeltek, Aytaç
2009 Causative constructions in the Turkish variety of the bilingual Muslim community of Rhodes: A preliminary research. In Ay, Sıla & Aydın, Özgür & Ergenç, İclâl & Gökmen, Seda & İşsever, Selçuk & Peçenek, Dilek (eds.), Essays on Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 403–412. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976 Towards a universal definition of “subject.” In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard
1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 63–99.Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Davis, Anthony R.
2001 Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1). 71–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac & Polinsky, Maria
1993 Causee and patient in the causative of transitive: Coding conflict or doubling of grammatical relations? In Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria (eds.), Causatives and transitivity (Studies in Language Companion Series 23), 177–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2014 Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Grafmiller, Jason
2013 Do you always fear what frightens you? In King, Tracy Holloway & de Paiva, Valeria (eds.), From quirky case to representing space: Papers in honor of Annie Zaenen, 21–32. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1991 Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41(1–3). 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 The semantic determinants of argument expression: A view from the English resultative construction. In Guéron, Jacqueline & Lecarme, Jacqueline (eds.), The syntax of time, 477–494. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Chao
2008 Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Where syntax, semantics, and pragmatics meet. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2009 On the argument realization of causatives. In Sutcliffe, Patricia & Stanford, Lois M. & Lommel, Arle R. (eds.), LACUS forum XXXIV: Speech and beyond, 137–146. Houston: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
2013 Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Simple syntax and complex thematic relations. Language Sciences 371. 99–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Argument realization of psychological verbs. Studies in Language 42(4). 755–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Linding
1980 Dongbuge jushi [Sentence types containing the verb-complement construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1980(2). 93–103.Google Scholar
1984 Jiujing nage “bu” nage? [Which on earth complements which?]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1984(2). 1–10.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei
1990 On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8(2). 177–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(2). 255–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Cross-componential causativity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17(3). 445–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Huei-Ling
1998 The syntax-morphology interface of verb-complement compounds in Mandarin Chinese. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Lin, Jimmy
2004 Event structure and the encoding of arguments: The syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
2001 Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California at Irvine. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Liu, Mingming
2014 Mandarin resultative verb compound involves VP complementation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1). ( Proceedings of the 37th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference ). 1–9. (Article 24.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2017-​08-16.)
López, Luis
2012 Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Jianming
1990 “VA le” shubu jiegou yuyi fenxi [A semantic analysis of VA-le verb-complement constructions]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1990(1). 1–6.Google Scholar
Ma, Xiwen
1987 Yu dongjieshi dongci youguan de mouxie jushi [Certain syntactic structures related to resultative verb compounds]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1987(6). 424–441.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Geda
2011 Causation and dominance: A study of Finnish causative verbs expressing social dominance. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Introducing arguments. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1998 Building verb meanings. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2001 An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77(4). 766–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002 The theta system–an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229–290.Google Scholar
Salih, Mahmud Husein
1985 Aspects of clause structure in Standard Arabic: A study in relational grammar. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Shi, Chunhong
2008 Hanyu dongjieshi de jufa yuyi yanjiu [Syntactic and semantic studies of Chinese resultative verb compounds]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1991 Causatives and universal grammar: An alternative interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society 89(1). 65–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Causatives and causation: A universal-typological perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Suhandano
1994 Grammatical relations in Javanese: A short description. Canberra: Australian National University. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint
1999 The Mandarin VP (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 44). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1976 Semantic causative types. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 41–116. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1). 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tham, Shiao Wei
2015 Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin. In Wang, William S-Y. & Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 306–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
1973 Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A case for lexical rules. Language 49(2). 361–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokunaga, Misato
1997 External control in causatives of English and Japanese. In Melby, Alan K. (ed.), The Twenty-third LACUS Forum, 289–299. Chapel Hill: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.
1990 Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2). 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Role and Reference Grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 707–741. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitale, Anthony J.
1981 Swahili syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Hongqi
1996 Dongjieshi shubu jiegou de yuyi shi shenme [What is the semantics of the verb-complement construction]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1996(1). 24–27.Google Scholar
Wang, Lingling
2001 A study of resultative constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander
2005 Complex causatives and verbal valence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2014 Causal VVs in Mandarin. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 311–341. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Yulin
2001 Shujieshi peijia de kongzhi–huanyuan fenxi [A control-reduction analysis of the valency of the verb-result construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2001(5). 399–410.Google Scholar