Article published in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp. 127

Full-text

Introduction to the templatic verb morphology of Birhor (Birhoɽ), a Kherwarian Munda language
References

[ p. 25 ]References

Adhikary, Ashim Kumar
1984Society and world view of the Birhor (Memoir 60). Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India, Ministry of Education and Culture, Government of India.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S.
2007The Munda verb: Typological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Auxiliary verb constructions (and other complex predicate types): A functional-constructional typology. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(11). 795–828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Prosody, phonological domains and the structure of roots, stems and words in the Munda languages in a comparative/historical light. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(2). 163–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Jora, Bikram
2018Negation, TAM and person-indexing interdependencies in the Munda languages: A preliminary report. In Ring, Hiram & Rau, Felix (eds.), Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (JSEALS Special Publication 3), 36–59. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Zide, Norman H.
2002Issues in proto-Munda and proto-Austroasiatic nominal derivation: The Bimoraic Constraint. In Macken, Marlys A. (ed.), Papers from the 10th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 55–74. Tempe: Arizona State University, Southeast Asian Studies Program.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1962The Menomini language. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Bodding, Paul Olaf
1929Santal grammar for beginners. Dumka: Santal Mission of Northern Churches.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy
1993The syntax of discourse functions in Fox. In Peterson, David A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special Session on Syntactic Issues in Native American Languages, 11–21. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1995Topic, focus, and word order problems in Algonquian (The Belcourt Lectures). Winnipeg: Voices of Rupert’s Land.Google Scholar
Dash, Jagannatha
1998Human ecology of foragers. A study of Khariā (Savara), Ujiā (Savara) and Birhor in Similipāl Hills. New Delhi: Commonwealth.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1986Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4). 808–845. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2008A grammar of Hup. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firdos, Sohel
2005Forest degradation, changing workforce structure and population redistribution: The case of Birhors in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly 40(8). 773–778.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Arun
1994Santali: A look into Santal morphology. New Delhi: Gyan Pub. House.Google Scholar
2008Santali. In Anderson, Gregory D. S. (ed.), The Munda languages, 11–98. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff C.
2003Strong linearity: Three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions. Berkeley: UC Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2005Reconstructing morpheme order in Bantu: The case of causativization and applicativization. Diachronica 22(1). 3–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 26 ]
2007Strong linearity, weak linearity, and the typology of templates. In Miestamo, Matti & Wälchli, Bernhard (eds.), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations, 11–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011The typology of templates. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(10). 731–747. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grierson, George A.
(ed.) 1906Linguistic survey of India, volume IV: Munda and Dravidian languages. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2003Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 245–281. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon
1993Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11(4). 559–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kari, James
1989Affix positions and zones in the Athapaskan verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 55(4). 424–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiran, Savita & Peterson, John M.
2010Sadani/Sadri language. (English version of Russian text it appears based on side by side comparison.) (http://​www​.southasiabibliography​.de​/uploads​/Sadri​.pdf) (Accessed 2015-06-15.)
2011Sadani/Sadri jazyk (Sadani/Sadri language). In Oranskaja, T. I., Mazurov, Ju. V., Kibrik, A. A., Kulikov, L. I. & Rusakov, A Ju. (eds.) Jayki Mira: Novye indoarijskie jazyki–Languages of the world: New Indo-Aryan languages, 367–379. RAN Institut Jazykoznanija. Moscow: Akademija.Google Scholar
Kumar, Sudhir
2004The Birhors of Chotanagpur region (A study in tribal geography). New Delhi: Rajesh Publications.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Floyd G.
1953Oneida verb morphology. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Maganga, Clement & Schadeberg, Thilo
1992Kinyamwezi: Grammar, texts, vocabulary (East African Languages and Dialects 1). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
McLendon, Sally
1975A grammar of Eastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh Chandra & Sinha, Durganand & Berry, John Widdup
1996Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of adivasis in Bihar. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Mohua
2000The Birhor towards the next millennium: Glimpses of a primitive tribal group at Kodarma in Bihar. Howrah: Sujan Publications.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1988Affix order and interpretation: Quechua. In Everaert, Martin & Evers, Arnold & Huybregts, Riny & Trommelen, Mieke (eds.), Morphology and modularity: In honour of Henk Schultink, 259–279. Dordrecht: Foris.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neukom, Lukas
2001Santali (Languages of the World/Materials 323). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel
2010Verbal morphology in Murrinh-Patha: Evidence for templates. Morphology 20(2). 321–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osada, Toshiki
1993Field notes on Birhor. In Nara, Tsuyoshi (ed.), A computer-assisted study of South-Asian languages, 30–40. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Ota, A. B. & Sahoo, Trilochan
2010The Birhor. Bhubaneswar: Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI).Google Scholar
Roy, Sarat Chandra
1925The Birhors: A little-known jungle tribe of Chota Nagpur. Ranchi: G. E. L. Mission Press.Google Scholar
Sahu, Chaturbhuj
1995Birhor tribe: Dimensions of development. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.Google Scholar
[ p. 27 ]
Sarkar, Sangita
2012Birhor: A sociolinguistic study of language endangerment. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward
2004Ket. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar