Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.127
References (41)
References
Adhikary, Ashim Kumar. 1984. Society and world view of the Birhor (Memoir 60). Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India, Ministry of Education and Culture, Government of India.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2007. The Munda verb: Typological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Auxiliary verb constructions (and other complex predicate types): A functional-constructional typology. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(11). 795–828. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Prosody, phonological domains and the structure of roots, stems and words in the Munda languages in a comparative/historical light. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(2). 163–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Jora, Bikram. 2018. Negation, TAM and person-indexing interdependencies in the Munda languages: A preliminary report. In Ring, Hiram & Rau, Felix (eds.), Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (JSEALS Special Publication 3), 36–59. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Zide, Norman H. 2002. Issues in proto-Munda and proto-Austroasiatic nominal derivation: The Bimoraic Constraint. In Macken, Marlys A. (ed.), Papers from the 10th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 55–74. Tempe: Arizona State University, Southeast Asian Studies Program.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1962. The Menomini language. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Bodding, Paul Olaf. 1929. Santal grammar for beginners. Dumka: Santal Mission of Northern Churches.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1993. The syntax of discourse functions in Fox. In Peterson, David A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special Session on Syntactic Issues in Native American Languages, 11–21. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
. 1995. Topic, focus, and word order problems in Algonquian (The Belcourt Lectures). Winnipeg: Voices of Rupert’s Land.Google Scholar
Dash, Jagannatha. 1998. Human ecology of foragers. A study of Khariā (Savara), Ujiā (Savara) and Birhor in Similipāl Hills. New Delhi: Commonwealth.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4). 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firdos, Sohel. 2005. Forest degradation, changing workforce structure and population redistribution: The case of Birhors in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly 40(8). 773–778.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Arun. 1994. Santali: A look into Santal morphology. New Delhi: Gyan Pub. House.Google Scholar
. 2008. Santali. In Anderson, Gregory D. S. (ed.), The Munda languages, 11–98. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff C. 2003. Strong linearity: Three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions. Berkeley: UC Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2007. Strong linearity, weak linearity, and the typology of templates. In Miestamo, Matti & Wälchli, Bernhard (eds.), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations, 11–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011. The typology of templates. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(10). 731–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grierson, George A. (ed.) 1906. Linguistic survey of India, volume IV: Munda and Dravidian languages. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2003. Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 245–281. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 1993. Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11(4). 559–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kari, James. 1989. Affix positions and zones in the Athapaskan verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 55(4). 424–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiran, Savita & Peterson, John M. 2010. Sadani/Sadri language. (English version of Russian text it appears based on side by side comparison.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2015-06-15.)
2011. Sadani/Sadri jazyk (Sadani/Sadri language). In Oranskaja, T. I., Mazurov, Ju. V., Kibrik, A. A., Kulikov, L. I. & Rusakov, A Ju. (eds.) Jayki Mira: Novye indoarijskie jazyki–Languages of the world: New Indo-Aryan languages, 367–379. RAN Institut Jazykoznanija. Moscow: Akademija.Google Scholar
Kumar, Sudhir. 2004. The Birhors of Chotanagpur region (A study in tribal geography). New Delhi: Rajesh Publications.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1953. Oneida verb morphology. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Maganga, Clement & Schadeberg, Thilo. 1992. Kinyamwezi: Grammar, texts, vocabulary (East African Languages and Dialects 1). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
McLendon, Sally. 1975. A grammar of Eastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh Chandra & Sinha, Durganand & Berry, John Widdup. 1996. Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of adivasis in Bihar. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Mohua. 2000. The Birhor towards the next millennium: Glimpses of a primitive tribal group at Kodarma in Bihar. Howrah: Sujan Publications.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1988. Affix order and interpretation: Quechua. In Everaert, Martin & Evers, Arnold & Huybregts, Riny & Trommelen, Mieke (eds.), Morphology and modularity: In honour of Henk Schultink, 259–279. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neukom, Lukas. 2001. Santali (Languages of the World/Materials 323). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2010. Verbal morphology in Murrinh-Patha: Evidence for templates. Morphology 20(2). 321–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osada, Toshiki. 1993. Field notes on Birhor. In Nara, Tsuyoshi (ed.), A computer-assisted study of South-Asian languages, 30–40. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Ota, A. B. & Sahoo, Trilochan. 2010. The Birhor. Bhubaneswar: Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI).Google Scholar
Roy, Sarat Chandra. 1925. The Birhors: A little-known jungle tribe of Chota Nagpur. Ranchi: G. E. L. Mission Press.Google Scholar
Sahu, Chaturbhuj. 1995. Birhor tribe: Dimensions of development. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sangita. 2012. Birhor: A sociolinguistic study of language endangerment. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward. 2004. Ket. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar