Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 23:2 (2022) ► pp.240–273

Verb stem alternation in Gongduk

Synchronic and diachronic analysis

| Universität Bern
This paper provides a first overview of verb stem alternation in Gongduk (eastern Bhutan, Trans-Himalayan). Verb stem alternation in Gongduk is conditioned both by morphophonology and by grammatical categories. This paper presents both the morphophonologically transparent as well as the phonologically opaque, paradigmatic stem alternation. The analysis provided in this paper identifies seven verb classes and a small number of irregular verbs. Additionally, this paper provides some diachronic observations on Gongduk verb stems and shows that different stem classes of Gongduk preserve derivational morphology (valence, direction) with cognates in other branches of the language family. Gongduk therefore provides important evidence for the historical investigation of derivational morphology and verb stem alternation in Trans-Himalayan.
Keywords: Gongduk, verbal morphology, stem alternation, Trans-Himalayan, derivational morphology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gongduk agreement morphology
  • 3.Morphophonological stem alternation
  • 4.Verb classes
    • 4.1Class 1
    • 4.2Class 2
    • 4.3Class 3
    • 4.4Class 4
    • 4.5Class 5
    • 4.6Class 6
    • 4.7Class 7
    • 4.8Irregular verb stems
  • 5.Diachronic observations
    • 5.1Frozen valence suffixes
    • 5.2Traces of directional prefixes
    • 5.3External cognates for classes 5–7
  • 6.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 29 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00105.ger
References (42)
References
Bauman, James John. 1975. Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014. Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-07-05.) (Version 1.1, 20 September 2014.) DOI logo
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caughley, Ross. 2000. Dictionary of Chepang: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal (Pacific Linguistics 502). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).Google Scholar
Coblin, W. South. 1976. Notes on Tibetan verbal morphology. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 62(1). 45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2003. Lhasa Tibetan. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 270–288. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal (LOT Dissertation Series 222). Utrecht: LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Gerber, Pascal. 2019. Gongduk agreement morphology in functional and diachronic perspective. (Paper presented at the ISBS Inaugural Conference, Magdalen College, University of Oxford, 10 January 2019.)
. 2020. Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Mönpa phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43(1). 55–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Pascal & Grollmann, Selin. 2018. What is Kiranti? A critical account. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 11(1-2). 99–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grollmann, Selin & Gerber, Pascal. 2018. Linguistic evidence for a closer relationship between Lhokpu and Dhimal: Including some remarks on the Dhimalish subgroup. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 47(1). 1–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2014. Grammatically conditioned sound change. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(6). 211–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2012. An internal reconstruction of Tibetan stem alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(2). 212–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese? Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 9(2). 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 381. 177–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Lahaussois, Aimée & Rai, Dhan Bahadur & Kumar, Yadav. 2015. Khaling-Nepali-English verb dictionary (Version 1.0). ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-07-07.)
Jäschke, Heinrich August. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary: With special reference to the prevailing dialects, to which is added an English-Tibetan vocabulary. London: Unger Brothers.Google Scholar
King, John T. 2009. A grammar of Dhimal (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 8). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2002. Aspects of the grammar of Thulung Rai: An endangered Himalayan language. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)
LaPolla, Randy J. 2003. Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction (University of California Publications in Linguistics 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1985. Tibeto-Burman dental suffixes: Evidence from Limbu (Nepal). In Thurgood, Graham & Matisoff, James A. & Bradley, David (eds.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art, papers presented to Paul K. Benedict for his 71st birthday (Pacific Linguistics Series C87), 363–375. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).Google Scholar
. 1988. La langue hayu (Collection Sciences du Langage). Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2004. A grammar of Wambule: Grammar, lexicon, texts and cultural survey of a Kiranti tribe of Eastern Nepal (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plaisier, Heleen. 2007. A Grammar of Lepcha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Modi, Yankee. 2018. Not quite “middle”: Subject autonomy marking in Milang, Tani and Tibeto-Burman. (Talk given at the ICSTLL 51, Kyoto University, 28 September 2018.)
Rüfenacht, Sara. 2018. Die kritische Betrachtung eines Klassifikationsvorschlags der Sprache Thangmi [The critical examination of a classification proposal of the Thangmi language]. Bern: University of Bern. (Bachelor’s thesis.)
Rutgers, Roland. 1998. Yamphu: Grammar, texts and lexicon (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sotrug, Yeshy T. 2015. Linguistic evidence for madeskā kirãtī: The phylogenetic position of Dhimalish. Bern: University of Bern. (Master’s thesis.)
Tolsma, Gerard Jacobus. 2006. A grammar of Kulung (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Turin, Mark. 2012. A grammar of the Thangmi language: With an ethnolinguistic introduction to the speakers and their culture (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 6). Leiden: Brill. (21 vols.)Google Scholar
van Breugel, Seino. 2014. A grammar of Atong (Brill’s Studies in South and Southwest Asian Languages 5). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George. 1987. A grammar of Limbu (Mouton Grammar Library 4). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. The fall and rise of the phoneme /r/ in Eastern Kiranti: Sound change in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53(1). 83–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993a. A grammar of Dumi (Mouton Grammar Library 10). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993b. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 56(2). 292–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Dzongkha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 1). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.Google Scholar
. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan region containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 2 South Asia 10). Leiden: Brill. (21 vols.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Biactantial agreement in the Gongduk transitive verb in the broader Tibeto-Burman context. In Thornes, Timothy J. & Andvik, Erik & Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Jansen, Joana (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey (Typological Studies in Language 103), 69–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfenden, Stuart Norris. 1929. Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic morphology: With special reference to the prefixes, infixes and suffixes of classical Tibetan and the languages of the Kachin, Bodo, Nâgâ, Kuki-Chin and Burma groups (Prize Publication Fund XII). London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wagner, Thomas
2023. Irregular Verb Morphology: Theoretical Accounts. In English Interlanguage Morphology, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Wagner, Thomas
2023. Irregular Verb Morphology: L1 and L2 Cognitive Accounts. In English Interlanguage Morphology, ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.