Article in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:2 (2023) ► pp. 216268
References
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Menéndez-Benito, Paula
2010Modal indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 18(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balcerak Jackson, Brendan & Penka, Doris
2017Number word constructions, degree semantics and the metaphysics of degrees. Linguistics and Philosophy 40(4). 347–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Cooper, Robin
1981Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(2). 159–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David I. & Clark, Brady Z.
2008Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2012Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W.
1973Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.Google Scholar
Buccola, Brian & Spector, Benjamin
2016Modified numerals and maximality. Linguistics and Philosophy 39(3). 151–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2007Cross-polar nomalies. In Friedman, Tova & Gibson, Masayuki (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 17, 37–52. Storrs: University of Connecticut. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008The least at least can do. In Chang, Charles B. & Haynie, Hannah J. (ed.), WCCFL 26: Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114–120. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2009More or less. In Elliott, Malcolm & Kirby, James & Sawada, Osamu & Staraki, Eleni & Yoon, Suwon (eds.), CLS 43-2: Proceedings from the panels of the Forty-third Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 3–17. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Bylinina, Lisa & Nouwen, Rick
2018On “zero” and semantic plurality. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1). 1–23. (Article no. 98.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yi-Hsun
2018Superlative modifiers: Ignorance and concession. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Coppock, Elizabeth
2016Superlative modifiers as modified superlatives. In Moroney, Mary & Little, Carol-Rose & Collard, Jacob & Burgdorf, Dan (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26, 471–488. Austin: University of Texas at Austin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & Beaver, David I.
2014Principles of the exclusive muddle. Journal of Semantics 31(3). 371–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & Brochhagen, Thomas
2013Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers. Semantics and Pragmatics 61. 1–57. (Article no. 3.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta
2016Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dotlačil, Jakub & Nouwen, Rick
2016The comparative and degree pluralities. Natural Language Semantics 24(1). 45–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, Ewan & Wellwood, Alexis
2016Addressing the ‘two interface’ problem: Comparatives and superlatives. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 1(1). 1–29. (Article no. 5.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlewine, Micheal Yoshitaka
2007A new syntax-semantics for the Mandarin bi comparative. Chicago: University of Chicago. (Master’s thesis.)
Farkas, Donka F. & Kiss, Katalin É.
2000On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(3). 417–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart, & Nouwen, Rick
2007 At least et al.: The semantics of scalar modifiers. Language 83(3). 533–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Yael
2016A novel problem for the likelihood-based semantics of even . Semantics and Pragmatics 91. 1–28. (Article no. 2.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017A revised, gradability-based semantics for even . Natural Language Semantics 26(1). 51–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hackl, Martin
2001Comparative quantifiers. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Heim, Irene
1985Notes on comparatives and related matters. Austin: University of Texas at Austin. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
1999Notes on superlatives. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
2000Degree operators and scope. In Jackson, Brendan & Mathews, Tanya (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 101, 40–64. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
2006aLittle. In Gibson, Masayuki & Howell, Jonathan (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 16, 35–58. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
2006bRemarks on comparative clauses as generalized quantifiers. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline
1999Toward a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2). 117–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016The short answer: Implications for direct compositionality (and vice versa). Language 92(2). 331–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
1999Projecting the adjectives: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Routledge. (First published by Garland Publishing Inc.)Google Scholar
2009Modes of comparison. In Elliot, Malcolm & Kirby, James & Sawada, Osamu & Staraki, Eleni & Yoon, Suwon (eds.), CLS 43-1: Proceedings from the Main Session of the Forty-third Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 139–163. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2015A “de-Fregean” semantics (and neo-Gricean pragmatics) for modified and unmodified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 81. 1–44. (Article no. 10.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krantz, David H. & Luce, R. Duncan & Suppes, Patrick & Tversky, Amos
1971Foundations of measurement, volume 1: Additive and polynomial representations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1989An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5). 607–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Situations in natural language semantics. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Summer 2014 edn. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. (https://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/win2021​/entries​/situations​-semantics/) (Accessed 2022-10-19.)
Krifka, Manfred
1989Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Bartsch, Renate & van Benthem, Johan & van Emde Boas, Peter (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In Turner, Kenneth P. (ed.), The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 1), 257–291. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
Li, Xiao
2009Degreeless comparatives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lin, Jo-wang
2009Chinese comparatives and their implicational parameters. Natural Language Semantics 17(1). 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014The adjective of quantity duo ‘many/much’ and differential comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(2). 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther
2011The Chinese bi comparative. Lingua 121(12). 1767–1795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Two notes on Chinese bi comparatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 38(1). 69–91.Google Scholar
2018Projecting adjectives in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27(1). 67–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendia, Jon Ander
2016aFocusing on scales. In Hammerly, Christopher & Prickett, Brandon (eds.), NELS 46: Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 31, 11–24. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association (GLSA), Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
2016bKnown unknowns: Epistemic inferences of superlative modifiers. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Mihoc, Teodora
2019Decomposing logic: Modified numerals, polarity and exhaustification. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Nakanishi, Kimiko
2007Measurement in the nominal and verbal domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(2). 235–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nouwen, Rick
2010Two kinds of modified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 31. 1–41. (Article no. 3.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Modified numerals: The epistemic effect. In Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Menéndez-Benito, Paula (eds.), Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, 244–266. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica
2008Degree modification in natural language. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
2014The polysemy of measurement. Lingua 1431. 242–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Fred S.
1985Measurement theory: With applications to decisionmaking, utility, and the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige
2012[1996]Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 51. 1–69. (Article no. 6.) (Originally published in 1996.)Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1). 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Focus. In Lappin, Shalom & Fox, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 271–297. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit Weidman
2010Measurement theory in linguistics. Synthese 174(1). 151–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Bernhard
2016aConsistency preservation in quantity implicature: The case of at least . Semantics and Pragmatics 91. 1–47. (Article no. 1.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b At least and ignorance: A reply to Coppock & Brochhagen 2013. Semantics and Pragmatics 91. 1–17. (Article no. 10.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
2005Measure phrases as modifiers of adjectives. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 341. 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9(1). 67–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Yael & Stateva, Penka
2002Superlative expressions, context, and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(4). 453–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solt, Stephanie
2009The semantics of adjectives of quantity. New York: The City University of New York. (Doctoral dissertation.)
2015Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics 32(2). 221–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1988A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 425–449.Google Scholar
Stateva, Penka
2003Superlative more . In Young, Robert B. & Zhou, Yuping (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13, 276–291. Seattle: University of Washington. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomaszewicz, Barbara Maria
2015Superlative ambiguities: A comparative perspective. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
von Fintel, Kai
1994Restrictions on quantifier domains. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
2002A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In Kamp, Hans & Partee, Barbara (eds.), Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, 137–175. Elsevier. Oxford.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim
1984Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3(1-2). 1–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellwood, Alexis
2014Measuring predicates. College Park: University of Maryland, College Park. (Doctoral dissertation.)
2015On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(1). 67–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The meaning of more. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellwood, Alexis & Hacquard, Valentine & Pancheva, Roumyana
2012Measuring and comparing individuals and events. Journal of Semantics 29(2). 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Yimei
2016Interpreting questions with non-exhaustive answers. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)