Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:2 (2023) ► pp.302324
Alpatov, Vladimir M. & Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
2007Reciprocal, sociative, and competitive constructions in Japanese. In Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.), Reciprocal constructions (Typological Studies in Language 71), vol. 31, 1021–1094. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Delia & Cruschina, Silvio
2018The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–37. (Article no. 118.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko
2000Tuvaluan: A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bußmann, Hadumod
2002Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft [Lexicon of linguistics]. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie
2008Valency-changing operations in Wolof and the notion of “co-participation”. In König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 289–305. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Kanazawa, Makoto & Kim, Yookyung & McHombo, Sam & Peters, Stanley
1998Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(2). 159–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1983From pragmatics to grammar: Diachronic reflections on complex pasts and futures in Romance. Lingua 60(2-3). 183–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Chai-Song
2007Phulangsue sanghophyociuy yuhyengloncek thukseng [Typological characteristics of French reciprocal marking]. Seoul: Seoul National University. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987Emergent grammar. In Aske, Jon & Beery, Natasha & Michaelis, Laura & Filip, Hana (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on grammar and cognition, 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jendraschek, Gerd
2007La notion modale de possibilité en basque: Morphologie, syntaxe, sémantique, variations diachronique et sociolinguistique [The modal notion of possibility in Basque: Morphology, syntax, semantics, diachronic and sociolinguistic variation]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2014Future tense, prospective aspect, and irrealis mood as part of the situation perspective: Insights from Basque, Turkish, and Papuan. In De Brabanter, Philippe & Kissine, Mikhail & Sharifzadeh, Saghie (eds.), Future times, future tenses, 138–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars
1994Türkeitürkische Aspektotempora [Aspect-tenses in Turkey Turkish]. In Thieroff, Rolf & Ballweg, Joachim (eds.), Tense systems in European languages, 247–266. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
King, Alan Roy
1993Communicative grammar of the Basque verb (selected aspects). London: Queen Mary University of London. (Doctoral dissertation.)
König, Ekkehard & Kokutani, Shigehiro
2006Towards a typology of reciprocal constructions: Focus on German and Japanese. Linguistics 44(2). 271–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koo, Myung-Chul & Lehmann, Christian
2010Modality in the Korean suffix -keyss . Language Research 46(1). 83–102. ([URL]) (Accessed 2022-10-05.)
Lander, Yury & Arkadiev, Peter
2016On the right of being a comparative concept. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 403–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1990Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
2000Reciprocals without reflexives. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Curl, Traci S. (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions (Typological Studies in Language 41), vol. 21, 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2008Constructions expressing middle, reflexive and reciprocal situations in some Oceanic languages. In König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 105–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
National Institute of Korean Language
2021Pyocwun kwuke taysacen [Korean standard dictionary]. ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-04-22.)
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
(ed.) 2007Reciprocal constructions (Typological Studies in Language 71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Jin-Ho
2007Yuhyengloncek kwancemeyse pon hankwuke taymyengsa cheykyeyuy thukcing [The pronominal system of Korean viewed from a typological perspective]. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 501. 115–147.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
1999The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
2014Variations of double nominative in Korean and Japanese. In Gerland, Doris & Horn, Christian & Latrouite, Anja & Ortmann, Albert (eds.), Meaning and grammar of nouns and verbs, 339–372. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar