Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:4 (2023) ► pp.611673
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arakawa, Shintaro
2011An annotated Japanese translation of the Tagut version of Avatamsaka Sutra vol. 77 in Princeton University collection. Journal of Asian and African Studies 811. 147–305.Google Scholar
2012On the Tangut verb prefixes in “Tiansheng Code”. In Popova, Irina (ed.), Tanguts in Central Asia: A collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov, 58–71. Moscow: Oriental Literature.Google Scholar
2014On the Tangut verb phrase in The sea of meaning, established by the saints . Central Asiatic Journal 571. 15–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018On the “dual” suffix of Tangut. In Hayasi, Tooru & Kubo, Tomoyuki & Fujishiro, Setsu & Ohsaki, Noriko & Kishida, Yasuhiro & Sugahara, Mutsumi (eds.), Diversity and dynamics of Eurasian languages: The 20th commemorative volume dedicated to Prof. Dr. Masahiro Shōgaito (Contribution to the Studies of Eurasian languages Series 20), 69–83. Kobe: The Consortium for the Studies of Eurasian Languages.Google Scholar
Bai, Junwei
2019A grammar of Munya. Townsville: James Cook University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Baxter, William H.
1992A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaudouin, Mathieu
2018Etude du verbe tangoute dans le 𗴮𘊳 (Djịj¹ bo¹). Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales. (Master’s thesis.)
2022Tangut verb agreement: Optional or not? Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45(1). 93–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023Grammaire du tangoute. Phonologie et morphologie. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO). (Doctoral dissertation.)
Forthcoming. On locatives ·u² and 𘂤 =kha¹ . (To be published in Festschrift in Honor of Pr. M. Sofronov .)
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna
2007Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirkova, Katia
2014The Duoxu language and the Ersu-Lizu-Duoxu relationship. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 104–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Lizu (Ersu). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 823–839. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia & Wang, Dehe
2017Verbal aspect in Ganluo Ersu. Language and Linguistics 18(3). 355–382.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1). 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–39.Google Scholar
Downes, Alan
2018How does Tangut work? Ryde: Macquarie University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Duan, Yu-quan
2015The alternative conjunction mo2 in Tangut language. Yuyan Yanjiu 35(1). 123–126.Google Scholar
Gates, Jesse P.
2017Argument indexation in Stau from a cross-dialectal perspective. (Manuscript.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2023-05-04.)
2021A grammar of Mazur Stau. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Gong, Hwang-cherng
1999The tense vowels in Tangut and their origins. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 70(2). 531–558.Google Scholar
2001Personal agreements and phonological alternations in the Tangut verb. Language and Linguistics 2(1). 21–67.Google Scholar
2011Tangut philology: Collection of papers by Professor Hwang-cherng Gong. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology of the Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2017Verb stems in Tangut and their orthography. Scripta 91. 29–48.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honkasalo, Sami
2019A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Jacques, Guillaume
2007Textes tangoutes I: Le nouveau recueil sur l’amour parental et la piété filiale. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2009aThe origin of vowel alternations in the Tangut verb. Language and Linguistics 10(1). 17–27.Google Scholar
2014Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Japhug. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 614–634. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2021A grammar of Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton & Lai, Yunfan & Lobsang, Nima
2014Person marking in Stau. Himalayan Linguistics 13(1). 83–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Nima, Lobsang
2017Stau. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kepping, Ksenija B.
1975Subject and object agreement in the Tangut verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 2(2). 219–231.Google Scholar
Kepping, Ksenia B.
1985The Tangut language: Morphology. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2017Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Paris 3 – Sorbonne Nouvelle. (Doctoral dissertation.)
2021Betrayal through obedience: On the history of the unusual inflectional chain in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Linguistic Typology 25(1). 79–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan & Gong, Xun & Gates, Jesse P. & Jacques, Guillaume
2020Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia Linguistica 54(s41-s1). 171–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
1992‘Anti-ergative’ marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 15(1). 1–9.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Huang, Chenglong
2003A grammar of Qiang: With annotated texts and glossary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, Berthold
1916The Si-hia language: A study in Indo-Chinese philology. T’oung Pao 17(1). 1–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Fanwen
2008Xia Han zidian. 2nd edn. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Ying-chin & Ahrens, Kathleen
1992 Leilin Xixia yiben zhi yanjiu. Dalu Zazhi 84(5). 1–8.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction (University of California Publications in Linguistics 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morisse, Georges M.
1904Contribution préliminaire à l’étude de l’écriture et de la langue Si-hia. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres de l’Institut de France. Première série: Sujets divers d’érudition, vol. 11-21, 313–379. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishida, Tatsuo
1973A study of the Tosu-Chinese vocabulary, Tosu i-yu: The structure and lineage of Tosu, a new language. Kyoto: Shoukadoh.Google Scholar
1976Hsihsia, Tosu and Lolo-Burmese languages. Studia Phonologica 101. 1–15.Google Scholar
2004Xixiayu wenfa xintan. In Lin, Ying-chin & Hsu, Fang-min & Lee, Chun-chih & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Yang, Hsiu-fang & Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan studies: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday, 353–381. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Prins, Marielle
2016A grammar of rGyalrong, Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects: A web of relations. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Jinbo & Huang, Zhenhua & Nie, Hongyin
1993Leilin yanjiu. Yinchuan: Ningxia People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Solonin, Kirill
1995The Twelve Kingdoms. Saint Petersburg: Petersburg Oriental Studies.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2000aParallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.Google Scholar
2000bStem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics 1(2). 211–232.Google Scholar
2003Caodeng rGyalrong. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 1st edn., 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007aThe irrealis category in rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics 8(3). 797–819.Google Scholar
2007bMorphological causative formation in Shangzhai Horpa. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 2(1). 211–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The ancestry of Horpa: Further morphological evidence. In Kong, Jiangping (ed.), The ancestry of the languages and peoples of China (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 29), 24–43. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Tian, Qianzi
2013Verb agreement in Gexi Horpa. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 7(2). 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, Qianzi & Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2019On tense and aspect in the Gexi Horpa verb. Language and Linguistics 20(3). 452–469.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Dorje, Sangda
2010Manuel de tibétain standard: Langue et civilisation. Paris: L’Asiathèque.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy J.
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tunzhi, Sonam Lhundrop
2019Outline of Bra‘go variety of rTa’u (Horpa). Melbourne: La Trobe University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Zhang, Shuya
2020Le rgyalrong situ de Brag-bar et sa contribution à la typologie de l’expression des relations spatiales: L’orientation et le mouvement associé. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Zhang, Sihong
2013A reference grammar of Ersu: A Tibeto-Burman language of China. Townsville: James Cook University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Zhang, Yongfu
2022Tangut first and second person dual suffixes and person category revisited. Minzu Yuwen 2022(1). 95–105.Google Scholar