Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:4 (2023) ► pp.674–732

Rethinking postverbal ‘acquire’ and related constructions in Cantonese

Polyfunctionality and parameters

| Hong Kong Shue Yan University
This paper revisits a well-established areal phenomenon in Mainland Southeast Asia and Northern Europe involving an element, ACQ(UIRE), that functions as a lexical verb meaning ‘to get or acquire’ and appears, as a functional item, in numerous seemingly unrelated constructions such as modal constructions, resultatives, descriptive complementation, and focus constructions. This paper presents a generative framework for the postverbal ACQ-structures in Hong Kong Cantonese involving the marker dak1. The proposed framework takes into account four readings of postverbal ACQ-sentences, namely potential, permission, descriptive, and focus, and argues that all postverbal ACQ-structures in Cantonese share the same basic configuration in which the ACQ heads a vP-internal ModP which expresses possibility modality and selects a small clause XP. The postverbal ACQ takes an AspP as complement which indicates the (non-)realization of the projected endpoint. The interpretational difference and other structural variations are boiled down to the three parameters realized in featural terms as: [±Realised] on Asp0, [±Possibility] and [±Deontic] on Mod0. The analysis also provides an explanation for several long-standing issues, including the verb-copying phenomenon, the co-occurrence of dak1 with the modal auxiliary ho2ji5, the distribution of the A-not-A form and negation, and the across-the-board aspectual incompatibility in postverbal ACQ-structures. The parametric framework demonstrates how apparently unrelated ACQ-constructions are closely connected with each other and provide a testable model to account for cross-linguistic variation found in other ACQ languages.
Keywords: ACQ(UIRE), featural parameters, possibility modality, realization, small clause, focus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature on Cantonese postverbal ACQ-sentences
    • 2.1The modal readings
    • 2.2The non-modal readings
  • 3.The core proposal
    • 3.1The postverbal ACQ structure: A unification
    • 3.2Deriving the modal reading: [−Realised] [+Possibility]
      • 3.2.1Deriving a potential reading
      • 3.2.2Deriving a permission reading
      • 3.2.3Why ambiguous?
      • 3.2.4Modal concord
    • 3.3Deriving the descriptive reading: [+Realised] [+Possibility]
      • 3.3.1Descriptive-potential ambiguity is achievement-ability implicature
      • 3.3.2What is the AP describing?
        • 3.3.2.1A discourse salient object
        • 3.3.2.2The definiteness constraint
        • 3.3.2.3Manner vs. result modification
      • 3.3.3Why is ACQ obligatory?
  • 4.Further application of the proposed analysis
    • 4.1Across-the-board aspectual incompatibility in postverbal ACQ-sentences
    • 4.2Linearization and morphological status of postverbal ACQ
    • 4.3Postverbal ACQ and focus
      • 4.3.1Cantonese postverbal dak1 as focus operator?
      • 4.3.2Other related focus phenomena: A-not-A formation and negation scope
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 14 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00143.chi
References (92)
References
Anonymous. 1872. The gospel according to St. Mark in the Cantonese colloquial. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3). 413–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.). 1995. The generic book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuan Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary & Peyraube, Alain. 2016. Modality and mood in Sinitic. In Nuyts, Jan & van der Auwera, Johan (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 296–329. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1986. De in Mandarin Chinese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 31(4). 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(3). 197–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Wh-NPs vs. wh-pronominals. (Paper presented at the Workshop on Polarity, Quantification, Free-Choice and Wh, University of York, 22–23 November 2002.)
. 2007. Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In Corver, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo (eds.), The copy theory of movement (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107), 151–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Forked modality. In Cornips, Leonie & Fikkert, Paula (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Postverbal ‘can’ in Cantonese (and Hakka) and Agree. Lingua 114(4). 419–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Ting-Au. 1997. Xianggang Yueyu cidian. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, Samuel Hung-Nin. 1972. Xianggang Yueyu yufa de yanjiu. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In Carlson, Gregory N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.), The generic book, 176–223. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. A minimalist program. 1st edn. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil. 1999. Where is a sign merged? Glot International 4(6). 20.Google Scholar
. 2002. Modals and negation in English. In Barbiers, Sjef & Beukema, Frits & van der Wurff, Wim (eds.), Modality and its interaction with the verbal system (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47), 133–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2001. On genetic and areal linguistics in Mainland South-East Asia: Parallel polyfunctionality of ‘acquire’. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 255–290. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003. Linguistics epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia. 1st edn. Oxon: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 1995. Negation in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(4). 665–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Chinese evidence for semi-arguments. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 26(1-2). 117–132.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart & Huitink, Janneke. 2006. Modal concord. In Dekker, Paul Jacques Edgar & Zeijlstra, Hedde (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI 2006) Workshop “Concord Phenomena at the Syntax-Semantics Interface”, 15–20. Málaga: University of Málaga.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 1251. 34–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In D’Alessandro, Roberta & Franco, Irene & Gallego, Ángel J. (eds.), The verbal domain (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 64), 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herburger, Elena. 2000. What counts: Focus and quantification (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 36). Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. 2012. Early Cantonese tagged database. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-02-26.)
Hu, Xiaoming. 2010. A new study on Mandarin irrealis “V DE/BU X” construction. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Huang, Chu-Ren & Mangione, Louis. 1985. A reanalysis of de: Adjuncts and subordinate clauses. In Goldberg, Jeffrey & MacKaye, Susannah & Wescoat, Michael (eds.), WCCFL 4: The Proceedings of the Fourth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistic, 80–91. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1988. Wǒ pǎo de kuài and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64(2). 274–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Larson, Richard K. & Iatridou, Sabine & Lahiri, Utpal & Higginbotham, James (eds.), Control and grammar, 109–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kwok, Bit-Chee & Chin, Andy C. & Tsou, Benjamin K. 2011. Poly-functionality of the preverbal “acquire” in the Nanning Yue dialect of Chinese: An areal perspective. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 74(1). 119–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Thomas Hun-Tak. 1995. Postverbal quantifiers in Cantonese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Li, Chao. 2015. On the V-DE construction in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua Sinica 11. 1–40. (Article 6.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, L. 1963. Dai “de” zi de buyu ju. Zhongguo Yuwen 1963(5). 396–410.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Raton: Dissertation.com. ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-20.)
Liu, Haiyong. 2004. Complex predicates in Mandarin Chinese: Three types of Bu-Yu structures. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Liu, Yuehua. 1980. The use of potential complements. Zhongguo Yuwen 1980(4). 246–257.Google Scholar
. 1982. Zhuangyu yu buyu de bijiao. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 1982(1). 22–37.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-kwong. 1999. The uses of the particle “得” [tɐk˥] in Cantonese. Fangyan 1999(3). 215–220.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. 1st edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mei, Kuang. 1978. Guoyu yufa zhong de dongcizu buyu. In Editorial Committee of Papers in honor of Professor Chu Wan-Li on his 70th birthday (ed.), Papers in honor of Professor Chu Wan-Li on his 70th birthday , 511–536. Taipei: Linking Publishing.Google Scholar
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2019. A semantic analysis of modal DE 得 in pre-modern Chinese. Lingua Sinica 5(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miao, Hsueh-Wei. 2010. Descriptive V-de construction as predication in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan: National Chi Nan University. (Master’s thesis.)
Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2). 303–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1974. The English verb. Revised edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Linna. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2017. The event domain. In D’Alessandro, Roberta & Franco, Irene & Gallego, Ángel J. (eds.), The verbal domain, 233–254. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, Bingcai & Ouyang, Jueya & Zhou, Wuji. 1981. Guangzhouhua fangyan cidian. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press (H.K.) Ltd.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats Edward. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1). 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Claudia. 1984. Adverbial modification in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12(2). 207–234.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, David & Ting, Jen. 2008. Morphological status of de in the V-de constructions of Mandarin Chinese: A study of interface between syntax and morphology. ([URL]) (Accessed 2023-09-11.) (The 11th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-11), Hsinchu, 23–25 May 2008.)Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2001. Focus, presupposition and light predicate raising in East and Southeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10(2). 89–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2017. Competing markers: Acquisitive and core modals in Modern Mandarin Chinese. Irish Journal of Asian Studies 31. 35–58.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 44). Dordrecht: Springer. ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-28.) DOI logo
. 2008. Zhuang: A Tai language with some Sinitic characteristics: Post-verbal ‘can’ in Zhuang, Cantonese, Vietnamese and Lao. In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From linguistics areas to areal linguistics (Studies in Language Companion Series 90), 221–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021a. Raise is rise+v (rather than rise+Voice). Snippets 401. 7–8. ([URL]) (Accessed 2023-05-02.) DOI logo
. 2021b. Voice and little v and VO–OV word-order variation in Chinese languages. Syntax 24(1). 44–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sybesma, Rint & Li, Boya. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117(10). 1739–1783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1981. The semantics of topic-focus articulation. In Groenendijk, Jan & Janssen, Theo & Stokhof, Martin (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (Part 21), 513–540. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.Google Scholar
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2002. Focus and dak in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 30(2). 266–309.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa deMena. 2010. Inner aspect: The articulation of VP (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 80). Dordrecht: Springer. ( DOI logo) (Accessed 2020-03-07.)Google Scholar
Tsai, Cheng-Yu Edwin. 2018. The syntax and semantics of descriptive V-de constructions: A primary predication analysis. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5(1). 59–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10(2). 129–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua 118(5). 675–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. In Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 11), 1–32. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Kehayov, Petar & Vittrant, Alice. 2009. Acquisitive modals. In Hogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 148), 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Jiewu. 2006. Two types of V-de constructions in Mandarin Chinese. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 97–107.Google Scholar
Wu, Ching-Huei Teresa. 2004. On de/bu and the syntactic nature of resultative verbal compounding. Language and Linguistics 5(1). 271–329.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunji. 2001. The development of [得DE+V] and [V+得DE] constructions in the Hunan dialects. Yuyan Yanjiu 2001(3). 45–59.Google Scholar
Xie, Zhiguo. 2012. The modal uses of de and temporal shifting in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21(4). 387–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2007. Modal Concord. In Friedman, T. & Gibson, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT XVII), 317–332. Storrs: The University of Connecticut. ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-06-15.) DOI logo
Zhang, Liyan & Ni, Liehuai. 1999. Gangshih Guangjhouhua cidian. Hong Kong: Wan Li Book Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wangxi. 1999. A semantic study of the unique syntactic structures in Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar