Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:4 (2023) ► pp.733–763

The grammaticalization of impossibility

The emergence of the Mandarin modal auxiliary wufa

 | Ningbo College of Health Sciences | KU Leuven
 | KU Leuven
This study, based on the analysis of historical corpus data, investigates the diachronic development of the Mandarin modal auxiliary wufa and establishes implications both for the grammaticalization of modals and for grammaticalization theory in general. Specifically, our study shows the following results: (1) The grammaticalization of wufa is characterized by coalescence, paradigmaticization, obligatorification, fixation, desemanticization, decategorialization and divergence. (2) Underlying mechanisms at work are structural reanalysis, later followed by syntactic expansion and host-class expansion. (3) The grammaticalization of wufa on the one hand confirms the diachronic path proposed in previous studies, viz., from root possibility to epistemic possibility; within the development of root possibility, however, it demonstrates a distinct path—from participant-external possibility to participant-internal possibility; it is suggested that an important driving force behind this peculiar development path is the Chinese cultural preference for collectivism. (4) The lexical source of modal wufa is a verb-complement sequence (rather than a single full verb).
Keywords: modal auxiliaries, possibility, grammaticalization, mechanisms of change, Mandarin Chinese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical context
    • 2.1Modality
    • 2.2Grammaticalization
  • 3. Wufa in Modern Chinese
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.The diachronic development of the modal auxiliary wufa
    • 5.1 Wu fa as a lexical string
    • 5.2The emergence of wufa/wu fa ke V
    • 5.3The emergence of wufa/wu fa VP
    • 5.4The decline of wufa/wu fa ke V and the rise of wufa/wu fa VP
    • 5.5The semantic development of wufa
    • 5.6Summarizing the development of wufa
  • 6. Wufa as a grammaticalized item
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 14 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00144.liu
References (52)
References
Alleton, Viviane. 1977. Les verbes auxiliaires de mode en chinois moderne. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 1(1). 31–41.Google Scholar
. 1984. Les auxiliaires de mode en chinois contemporain. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar. 1951. Grundzüge der semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der hochdeutschen Modalverba (Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser 32.6), 1–28. København: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Robert & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2020. What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 251–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. (31 vols.)Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang, Walter & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Björn (eds.), What makes grammaticalization—A look from its fringes and its components, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 1984. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume 1: Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2010. From positivity to possibility, propriety and necessity: Semantic change in culture. Chinese Language and Discourse 1(1). 66–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Peng, Xinjia. 2016. The emergence of disjunction: A history of the constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 101–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303–318.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Rota: Dissertation.com.
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 151–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Li. 2000. Xianqin hanyu zhudongci yanjiu. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Beijia. 2002. Yao de yufa hua. Yuyan Yanjiu 2002(4). 81–87.Google Scholar
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2008a. Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part I: The syntax and semantics of kě and kě yǐ . Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(1). 85–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part II: Negative Markers in combination with the modal auxiliary verbs kě and kě yǐ . Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(2). 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. From obligation to future? A diachronic sketch of the syntax and the semantics of the auxiliary verb dang . Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 40(2). 137–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. A new approach to the development of deontic markers: In pre-modern Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), A typological approach to grammaticalization and lexicalization: East meets West, 191–230. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E. 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1996. Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-hui Audrey (eds), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. In Wang, H. Samuel & Cao, Feng-fu & Lian, Chin-fa (eds.), Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 27–52. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2001. On the modal auxiliaries of volition in Classical Chinese. In Chappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 172–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain & Li, Ming. 2012. The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2008. From “emergence” to “ability”: A case of Japanese naru and dekiru . In Adams, Nikki & Cooper, Adam & Parrill, Fey & Wier, Thomas (eds), CLS 40–1: Proceedings from the Main Session of the Fortieth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 365–379. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2015. Modals and negation: A semantic explanation of the modal suppletion strategy in Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research 4(2). 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Kiyoko. 2008. Grammaticalization paths of the Thai verb dây: A corpus-based study. In Sidwell, Paul & Tadmor, Uri (eds.), Papers from the 16th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2006 (SEALS XVI), 122–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, Harry C. & McCusker, Christopher & Hui, C. Harry. 1990. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 59(5). 1006–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Kehayov, Petar & Vittrant, Alice. 2009. Acquisitive modals. In Hogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2014. Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 425–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong. 2003. The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese characters, the 11th century B.C.–present. (Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) of Peking University.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-03.)
Zhu, Guanming. 2005. The evolution of the modal auxiliary “bixu”. Yuyan Kexue 2005(3). 57–67.Google Scholar