Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:4 (2023) ► pp.733763
References
Alleton, Viviane
1977Les verbes auxiliaires de mode en chinois moderne. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 1(1). 31–41.Google Scholar
1984Les auxiliaires de mode en chinois contemporain. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar
1951Grundzüge der semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der hochdeutschen Modalverba (Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser 32.6), 1–28. København: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Robert & Pagliuca, William
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 251–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars
2011Grammatik over det Danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. (31 vols.)Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang, Walter & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Björn (eds.), What makes grammaticalization—A look from its fringes and its components, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert
1984Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume 1: Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2010From positivity to possibility, propriety and necessity: Semantic change in culture. Chinese Language and Discourse 1(1). 66–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Peng, Xinjia
2016The emergence of disjunction: A history of the constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 101–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303–318.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi
2004Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Rota: Dissertation.com.
Lightfoot, David W.
1979Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. Jonah
2012Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 151–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Li
2000Xianqin hanyu zhudongci yanjiu. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Beijia
2002Yao de yufa hua. Yuyan Yanjiu 2002(4). 81–87.Google Scholar
Meisterernst, Barbara
2008aModal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part I: The syntax and semantics of and kě yǐ . Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(1). 85–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bModal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part II: Negative Markers in combination with the modal auxiliary verbs and kě yǐ . Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(2). 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011From obligation to future? A diachronic sketch of the syntax and the semantics of the auxiliary verb dang . Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 40(2). 137–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020A new approach to the development of deontic markers: In pre-modern Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), A typological approach to grammaticalization and lexicalization: East meets West, 191–230. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2012Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E.
2003The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
2001Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, Alain
1996Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-hui Audrey (eds), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. In Wang, H. Samuel & Cao, Feng-fu & Lian, Chin-fa (eds.), Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 27–52. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
2001On the modal auxiliaries of volition in Classical Chinese. In Chappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 172–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain & Li, Ming
2012The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
1995Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2008From “emergence” to “ability”: A case of Japanese naru and dekiru . In Adams, Nikki & Cooper, Adam & Parrill, Fey & Wier, Thomas (eds), CLS 40–1: Proceedings from the Main Session of the Fortieth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 365–379. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sparvoli, Carlotta
2015Modals and negation: A semantic explanation of the modal suppletion strategy in Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research 4(2). 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Kiyoko
2008Grammaticalization paths of the Thai verb dây: A corpus-based study. In Sidwell, Paul & Tadmor, Uri (eds.), Papers from the 16th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2006 (SEALS XVI), 122–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, Harry C. & McCusker, Christopher & Hui, C. Harry
1990Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 59(5). 1006–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A.
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Kehayov, Petar & Vittrant, Alice
2009Acquisitive modals. In Hogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2014 Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 425–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong
2003The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese characters, the 11th century B.C.–present. (Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) of Peking University.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-03.)
Zhu, Guanming
2005The evolution of the modal auxiliary “bixu. Yuyan Kexue 2005(3). 57–67.Google Scholar