This study, based on the analysis of historical corpus data, investigates the diachronic development of the Mandarin modal auxiliary wufa and establishes implications both for the grammaticalization of modals and for grammaticalization theory in general. Specifically, our study shows the following results: (1) The grammaticalization of wufa is characterized by coalescence, paradigmaticization, obligatorification, fixation, desemanticization, decategorialization and divergence. (2) Underlying mechanisms at work are structural reanalysis, later followed by syntactic expansion and host-class expansion. (3) The grammaticalization of wufa on the one hand confirms the diachronic path proposed in previous studies, viz., from root possibility to epistemic possibility; within the development of root possibility, however, it demonstrates a distinct path—from participant-external possibility to participant-internal possibility; it is suggested that an important driving force behind this peculiar development path is the Chinese cultural preference for collectivism. (4) The lexical source of modal wufa is a verb-complement sequence (rather than a single full verb).
Alleton, Viviane. 1977. Les verbes auxiliaires de mode en chinois moderne. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 1(1). 31–41.
Alleton, Viviane. 1984. Les auxiliaires de mode en chinois contemporain. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Bech, Gunnar. 1951. Grundzüge der semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der hochdeutschen Modalverba (Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser 32.6), 1–28. København: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Robert & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. New York: Oxford University Press.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2020. What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 251–278.
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. (31 vols.)
Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang, Walter & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Björn (eds.), What makes grammaticalization—A look from its fringes and its components, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hofstede, Geert. 1984. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Hopper, Paul J.1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume 1: Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Peng, Xinjia. 2016. The emergence of disjunction: A history of the constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 101–136.
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303–318.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Rota: Dissertation.com.
Lightfoot, David W.1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 151–186.
Liu, Li. 2000. Xianqin hanyu zhudongci yanjiu. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
Ma, Beijia. 2002. Yao de yufa hua. Yuyan Yanjiu 2002(4). 81–87.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2008a. Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part I: The syntax and semantics of kě and kě yǐ. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(1). 85–120.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2008b. Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part II: Negative Markers in combination with the modal auxiliary verbs kě and kě yǐ. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(2). 197–222.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2011. From obligation to future? A diachronic sketch of the syntax and the semantics of the auxiliary verb dang. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 40(2). 137–188.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2020. A new approach to the development of deontic markers: In pre-modern Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), A typological approach to grammaticalization and lexicalization: East meets West, 191–230. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nisbett, Richard E.2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York: Free Press.
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peyraube, Alain. 1996. Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-hui Audrey (eds), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Peyraube, Alain. 1999. On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. In Wang, H. Samuel & Cao, Feng-fu & Lian, Chin-fa (eds.), Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 27–52. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Peyraube, Alain. 2001. On the modal auxiliaries of volition in Classical Chinese. In Chappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 172–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peyraube, Alain & Li, Ming. 2012. The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.1995. Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2008. From “emergence” to “ability”: A case of Japanese naru and dekiru. In Adams, Nikki & Cooper, Adam & Parrill, Fey & Wier, Thomas (eds), CLS 40–1: Proceedings from the Main Session of the Fortieth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 365–379. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2015. Modals and negation: A semantic explanation of the modal suppletion strategy in Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research 4(2). 163–193.
Takahashi, Kiyoko. 2008. Grammaticalization paths of the Thai verb dây: A corpus-based study. In Sidwell, Paul & Tadmor, Uri (eds.), Papers from the 16th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2006 (SEALS XVI), 122–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. & Dasher, Richard B.2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Triandis, Harry C. & McCusker, Christopher & Hui, C. Harry. 1990. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 59(5). 1006–1020.
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A.1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.
van der Auwera, Johan & Kehayov, Petar & Vittrant, Alice. 2009. Acquisitive modals. In Hogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wiemer, Björn. 2014. Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 425–467.
Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong. 2003. The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese characters, the 11th century B.C.–present. (Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) of Peking University.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-03.)
Zhu, Guanming. 2005. The evolution of the modal auxiliary “bixu”. Yuyan Kexue 2005(3). 57–67.