Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:4 (2023) ► pp.764–794

The {bei+verb+jiangqu} construction in pre-twelfth century Chinese

Its evolution and transcription

| Taizhou University
The Chinese string composed of {bei 被 + verb + jiang 將 + qu 去} is a rare, unique, unproductive, informal usage which, to date, has remained virtually unexplored. The present paper attempts to sketch its pre-twelfth century evolution by analyzing examples collected from various sources, but now from sources digitalized by CBETA ( Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association ). This paper begins by investigating the constituents in order to determine a core structure. It argues that jiang and qu are not two discrete elements but one single unit, reanalyzed in a new formula, {bei + verb + jiangqu} to replace the traditional notation {bei + verb + jiang + qu}.
Regarding the evolution of this collocation, the paper periodizes four stages of development. (1) The earliest examples appear in the fifth century, and they are of the {bei + verb₁ + verb₂ (+ verb₃)} order, in which jiangqu occupies either the second or third verbal slot. (2) Seventh century examples are showing signs of change, allowing, for the first time, an agent to be inserted between bei and the verb. (3) The eighth century witnesses a radical usage shift in which jiangqu has been demoted to a SIFE (“Semantically Impoverished Functional Element”), resulting in a new passive order {bei + verb + SIFE}. (4) The evolution continues in the ninth through eleventh centuries, becoming more complex, though somewhat dormant. This paper thus contributes to discussion of an understudied and thorny topic: How to segment short strings of Chinese characters. A few guidelines are suggested, and it is noted that some strings consisting of “verb, jiang, and qu” have been wrongly dissected: {verb + jiang + qu} must be rendered {verb + jiangqu}.
Keywords: {bei + verb + jiangqu}, Chinese passive, evolution, division, transcription, strings, jiang , qu
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data, methods, terms, etc
  • 3.The pre-twelfth century {bei + verb + jiangqu} usage
    • 3.1The fifth century
    • 3.2The seventh century
    • 3.3The eighth century
    • 3.4Further developments, ninth through eleventh centuries
  • 4.Implications: Divide Chinese strings composed of a few characters
    • 4.1The issue and the importance
    • 4.2How to divide the bei passive strings containing verb, jiang, and qu
    • 4.3Divide the active strings containing verb, jiang and qu
    • 4.4Four guidelines for dividing the Chinese strings
    • 4.5The application scope of the observations
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 14 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00145.sun
References (35)
References
Bennett, Paul A. 1981. The evolution of passive and disposal sentences. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9(1). 61–90.Google Scholar
Cao, Fengxia. 2014. Hanyu beidong biaoji gengti lishi yanjiu. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Guangshun. 1990. The development of the “V + jiang” construction from the Wei, Jin, and Northern and Southern dynasties to the Song dynasty. Zhongguo Yuwen 1990(2). 130–135.Google Scholar
Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association. 1998. The Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Corpus. ([URL]) (Accessed 2017-11-27.)
Coblin, W. South. 1991. A survey of Yijing’s transcriptional corpus. Yuyan Yanjiu 1991(1). 68–92.Google Scholar
Feng, Chuntian. 1992. A preliminary analysis of some grammatical phenomenon in Tang and Five dynasties. In Cheng, Xiangqing (ed.), Studies of Chinese language of the Sui, Tang and Five dynasties (581–960 A.D.), 269–326. Ji’nan: Shandong Education Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17(3). 291–319.Google Scholar
He, Leshi. 1992a. Dunhuang bianwen yu Shishuoxinyu ruogan yufa tedian de bijiao. In Cheng, Xiangqing (ed), Studies of Chinese language of the Sui, Tang and Five dynasties (581–960 A.D.), 133–268. Ji’nan: Shandong Education Press.Google Scholar
. 1992b. A study of the grammatical characteristics in Yuan drama – Through the comparison between the languages of the collection of ‘Guan Hanqing’s drama’ and the collection of ‘Dun Huang Bian Wen’. In Cheng, Xiangqing (ed), Studies on the Chinese language, Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties period (960–1644 A.D.), 19–242. Ji’nan: Shandong Education Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jian, Tao. 1986. Textual researching the “Poem of Swallow” of Dunhuang MSS. Dunhuang Yanjiu 1986(3). 24–38.Google Scholar
Li, Chao. 2007. Evolution of the bei constructions in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 35(1). 98–127.Google Scholar
Lin, Xinnian. 2006. Zutangji de dongtai zhuci yanjiu. Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Liu, Jian & Jiang, Lansheng & Bai, Weiguo & Cao, Guangshun. 1992. Jindai Hanyu xuci yanjiu. Beijing: Language & Culture Press.Google Scholar
Luo, Yaohua & Yao, Wenbiao. 2017. “V + zhi” jiegou de cihuihua ji xianguan wenti yanjiu. Yuwen Yanjiu 2017(1). 32–38.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1989. History of the passive constructions in Chinese until the 10th century. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17(2). 335–372.Google Scholar
Sun, Jianqiang. 2018. Re-dating the seven early Chinese Christian manuscripts: Christians in Dunhuang before 1200. Leiden: Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Tang, Yuming. 1987. A brief survey of the passive construction in Chinese of the period from 206 B.C. to 589 A.D. Zhongguo Yuwen 1987(3). 216–222.Google Scholar
. 1988. Tang zhi Qing de “bei” ziju. Zhongguo Yuwen 1988(6). 459–468.Google Scholar
. 2002. Zhuming zhongnian yuyanxuejia zixuanji: Tang Yuming juan. Hefei: Anhui Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Tang, Yuming & Zhou, Xifu. 1985a. On the origin of the passive voice in Ancient Chinese. Xueshu Yanjiu 1985(5). 98–100.Google Scholar
. 1985b. The development of passive voice in Classical Chinese. Zhongguo Yuwen 1985(4). 281–285.Google Scholar
Wang, Bangwei. 1996. Tang gaoseng Yijing shengping ji qi zhuzuo lunkao. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Wang, Li. 2004[1957]. Hanyu shigao. Revised edn. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (First published in 1957 by Science Press.)Google Scholar
. 2005. Hanyu yufa shi. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
(Song) Wang, Qinruo. 1989. Song ben ‘Cefu yuangui’. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (4 vols., originally published in 1013.)Google Scholar
Wei, Pei-chuan. 2013. The particle jiang in early Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 14(5). 875–928.Google Scholar
Wu, Fuxiang. 1996. ‘Dunhuang Bianwen’ yufa yanjiu. Changsha: Yuelu Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Zhenyu. 1991. “Dong + jiang + bu” jushi de lishi yanbian. Jilin Daxue Shehui Kexue Xuebao 1991(1). 86–90.Google Scholar
Xiao, Lirong. 2012. Zhonggu shishu beidongju yanjiu. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University. (Master’s thesis.)
Yan, Tingliang. 1998. Guanyu Yanzifu (jia) de xieben niandai wenti. Bulletin of Beijing Library 21. 102–107, 137.Google Scholar
Yuan, Bin. 2005. A passive sentence marked by “meng”. Yuyan Kexue 4(6). 3–17.Google Scholar
Zhang, Cheng. 2002. The historical evolution of the word-order of prepositional phrases in Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Meilan. 2003. ‘Zutangji’ yufa yanjiu. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yanjun. 2010. Hanyu beidongshi lishi yanjiu. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar