Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 25:1 (2024) ► pp.1–27

Topic drop and pro drop

| Harvard University
| National United University
One major difference between Chinese-type and German-type languages is that the former allows extensive types of argument drop, while the latter is quite limited beyond the existence of a null topic. This study argues (a) that it is necessary to distinguish among phenomena that have sometimes been referred to with the undifferentiating term “radical pro drop”; (b) that the null topic is restricted to root clauses (CP edge) based on its locality properties; (c) that the Chinese-type null topic requires licensing at the CP edge by Internal Merge; and (d) that the CP edge requirement may be lifted only under conditions of last resort. Evidence comes from our new observation of locality effects showing a contrast between overt and null topics. Specifically, while the pro option is available with an overt topic, null topics must be brought to the CP edge via Internal Merge.
Keywords: topic drop, null topic, pro drop, null subject, MCP
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Topic extraction and locality constraints
  • 3.Restrictions on topic drop
  • 4.Main clause phenomenon
  • 5.Connecting to the CP edge
  • 6.Conclusion and further remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00147.yan
References (53)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. Uniform and non-uniform aspects of pro-drop languages. In Ackema, Peter & Brandt, Patrick & Schoorlemmer, Maaike & Weerman, Fred (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 127–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1998. Parametrizing agr: Word order, verb-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Piliar. 2009. Two kinds of subject pro . Studia Linguistica 63(1). 2–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1986. I-subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 375–416.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 21. 303–351.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger & Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Melvyn Douglas. 2009. Null subjects: A reanalysis of the data. Linguistics 47(3). 559–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica 64(3). 271–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(4). 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Schwabe, Kerstin. & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self, and interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Zanuttini, Raffaella & Campos, Hector & Herburger, Elena & Portner, Paul (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense, and clausal architecture, 27–52. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. In Aelbrecht, Lobke & Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Locality and the distribution of main clause phenomena. In Aboh, Enoch Obladé & Guasti, Maria Teresa & Roberts, Ian (eds.), Locality, 186–222. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4). 533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.Google Scholar
. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Kenneth (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Remarks on the status of the null object. In Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 56–76. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Kao, Grant Hung-Ta. 2013. Subjunctive mood and main clause phenomena in Mandarin Chinese. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (MA thesis.)Google Scholar
Kato, Mary. 1999. Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus 11(1). 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1995. Discourse configurational languages: Introduction. In Kiss, Katalin É. (ed.), Discourse configurational languages, 3–27. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 458–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2007. The theory of empty categories and the identification of empty categories in Chinese. Yuyan Kexue 2007(2). 37–47.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist perspective. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Otani, Kazuyo & Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 221. 345–358.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation and defective goals. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1982. Pronoun-deleting processes in German. (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, California, 27–30 December 1982.)
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993. Argument-drop in old Icelandic. Lingua 89(2–3). 247–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42(2). 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. & Maling, Joan. 2008. Argument drop and the Empty Left Edge Condition (ELEC). Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 811. 1–27.Google Scholar
. 2010. The empty left edge condition. In Putnam, Michael T. (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 59–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1978. On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace filter. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
. 1980. On the nominative island condition, vacuous application, and the that-trace filter. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1977. A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Los Angeles: University of South California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1990. Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: A functional perspective. Taipei: Student Book Co.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 1986. Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry 17(1). 75–93.Google Scholar
. 2006. Topicalization in Asian languages. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 51, 137–174. Malden: Blackwell Pub. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Liejiong & Liu, Danqing. 1998. Topic: Structural and functional analysis. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Min. 2009. Hanyu huatihua jiegou xianzhi zhongde linjie tiaojian. In Editorial Committee of Essays on linguistics Center for Chinese Linguistics PKU (ed.), Essays on linguistics, vol. 391, 523–572. Beijing: Commercial Press. (Special edition in honor of Prof. Noam Chomsky)Google Scholar