Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 25:1 (2024) ► pp.5679
References
Azar, Moshe
1997Concession relations as argumentation. Text 17(3). 301–316.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, Katherine S. & Morris, Robin K.
1995Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(5). 1186–1196.Google Scholar
Box, George E. P. & Cox, David R.
1964An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 26(2). 211–252.Google Scholar
Burmester, Juliane & Spalek, Katharina & Wartenburger, Isabell
2014Context updating during sentence comprehension: The effect of aboutness topic. Brain & Language 1371. 62–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G.
2013Modeling multi-level factors using linear mixed effects. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19(1). 060028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drieghe, Denis & Pollatsek, Alexander & Staub, Adrian & Rayner, Keith
2008The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(6). 1552–1560.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Heather J. & Jayes, Lewis T.
2018Plausibility and perspective influence the processing of counterfactual narratives. Discourse Processes 55(2). 166–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Heather J. & Sanford, Anthony J.
2008Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language 58(3). 609–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela Dorkas. & Bahlmann, Jörg & Friedrich, Roland & Makuuchi, Michiru
2011The neural basis of recursion and complex syntactic hierarchy. Biolinguistics 5(1–2). 87–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann
1995The Structure-Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In Britton, Bruce K. & Graesser, Arthur C. (eds.), Models of understanding text, 289–311. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
1997Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes 23(3). 265–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Hargreaves, David J.
1988Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language 27(6). 699–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1988Universals of topic-comment structure. In Hammond, Michael & Moravczik, Edith A. & Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haberlandt, Karl
1980Story grammar and reading time of story constituents. Poetics 9(1–3). 99–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haberlandt, Karl & Berian, Claire & Sandson, Jennifer
1980The episode schema in story processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19(6). 635–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirotani, Masako & Schumacher, Petra B.
2011Context and topic marking affect distinct processes during discourse comprehension in Japanese. Journal of Neurolinguistics 24(3). 276–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeks, John C. J. & Vonk, Wietske & Schriefers, Herbert
2002Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 46(1). 99–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei
2009The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hung, Yu-Chen & Schumacher, Petra B.
2012Topicality matters: Position-specific demands on Chinese discourse processing. Neuroscience Letters 511(2). 59–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Animacy matters: ERP evidence for the multi-dimensionality of topic-worthiness in Chinese. Brain Research 15551. 36–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyönä, Jukka
1994Processing of topic shifts by adults and children. Reading Research Quarterly 29(1). 76–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995An eye movement analysis of topic-shift effect during repeated reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(5). 1365–1373.Google Scholar
Hyönä, Jukka & Lorch, Robert F. & Rinck, Mike
2003Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In Hyönä, Jukka & Radach, Ralph & Deubel, Heiner (eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, 313–334. Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2008Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics 401. 646–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi & Trueswell, John C.
2008Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(5). 709–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 63–99.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991Concessive relations as the dual of causal relations. In Zaefferer, Dietmar (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics, 190–209. Berlin: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra & Brockhoff, Per B. & Christensen, Rune H. B.
2017lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1971If’s, and’s and but’s: About conjunctions. In Fillmore, Charles J. & Langendoen, D. Terence (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics, 114–149. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell V.
2021emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. ([URL]). (Accessed 2023-07-30.)
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1976Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–485. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles
2018Subject prominence and processing dependencies in prenominal relative clauses: The comprehension of possessive relative clauses and adjunct relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Language 94(4). 758–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The psycholinguistics of Chinese discourse processing. In Shei, Chris (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 265–279. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorch, Elizabeth P. & Lorch, Robert F. & Gretter, Monica L. & Horn, Donna G.
1987On-line processing of topic structure by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 43(1). 81–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorch, Robert F. & Lorch, Elizabeth P. & Matthews, Patricia D.
1985On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language 24(3). 350–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorch, Robert F. & Lorch, Elizabeth P. & Morgan, Ann M.
1987Task effects and individual differences in on-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Discourse Processes 10(1). 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyu, Siqi & Tu, Jung-Yueh & Lin, Chien-Jer Charles
2020Processing plausibility in concessive and causal relations: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking. Discourse Processes 57(4). 320–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Edward J. & Duffy, Susan A. & Myers, Jerome L.
1986Anaphoric inference during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12(3). 346–352.Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan & Paul, Waltraud
2018The syntax of complex sentences in Mandarin Chinese: A comprehensive overview with analyses. Linguistic Analysis 42(1–2). 63–162.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2022R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ([URL]). (Accessed 2023-06-14.)
Rayner, Keith
1998Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124(3). 372–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, Keith & Warren, Tessa & Juhasz, Barbara J. & Liversedge, Simon P.
2004The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30(6). 1290–1301.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 271. 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schad, Daniel J. & Vasishth, Shravan & Hohenstein, Sven & Kliegl, Reinhold
2020How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial. Journal of Memory and Language 1101. 104038. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing
2014Topic and focus. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 100–125. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsao, Feng-Fu
1979A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step toward discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Co.Google Scholar
Wang, Luming & Schumacher, Petra B.
2013New is not always costly: Evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese. Frontiers in Psychology 41. 363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Sarah J.
2008Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34(1). 205–223.Google Scholar
Xing, Fuyi
2001Hanyu fuju yanjiu. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Xiaodong & Chen, Qingrong & Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Wu, Yicheng
2018Influence of concessive and causal conjunctions on pragmatic processing: Online measures from eye movements and self-paced reading. Discourse Processes 55(4). 387–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Xiaodong & Zhou, Xiaolin
2016Topic shift impairs pronoun resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 53(2). 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung & Gordon, Peter C. & Hendrick, Randall & Hue, Chih Wei
2003Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition 86(3). 283–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Xiaohong & Chen, Xuhai & Chen, Shuang & Xu, Xiaoying & Yang, Yufang
2013Topic structure affects semantic integration: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS ONE 8(12). e79734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar