Article In:
Language and Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Pseudo matrix sluicing constructions in Mandarin Chinese

ORCID logo | National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Speakers of Mandarin Chinese have a variety of ways to respond to others, one of which is the employment of a single wh-phrase to form a follow-up question. However, using a short wh-phrase to ask a question is not without any restrictions. Sometimes, the antecedent sentence needs to contain an indefinite NP, while at other times it does not. I first consider the possibility of applying the movement and ellipsis approach and the base-generation approach to these Mandarin short wh-phrase questions. Given the fact that neither of these analyses captures the syntactic properties of this type of question in Mandarin Chinese, I propose to deal with it in terms of an analysis that is based on LF-copying. More specifically, I propose that the wh-phrase in a short wh-phrase question is base-generated in the Spec of CP, which is followed by an empty IP in the underlying and surface structure. When this structure is processed at LF, it becomes interpretable after the antecedent IP is copied into the empty IP position. Since the wh-phrase remains in its original position throughout the derivation, I call this type of question a pseudo matrix sluicing construction. This analysis not only successfully accounts for the derivation of Mandarin short wh-questions, but also respects the fact that Mandarin Chinese is a wh-in-situ as well as a non-preposition-stranding language.
Keywords: ellipsis, fragment, sluicing, LF-copying, wh-phrase
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Japanese matrix sluicing constructions
    • 2.1 Hasegawa (2008)
    • 2.2 Fujiwara (2020)
  • 3.Mandarin pseudo matrix sluicing constructions
    • 3.1Potential analyses
      • 3.1.1The movement and ellipsis analysis
      • 3.1.2The base-generation approach
    • 3.2Proposal
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (46)
References
Abe, Jun. 2015. The in-situ approach to sluicing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, Perng Wang. 2004. The structure of sluicing in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10(1). 1–16. (Proceedings of the 27th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium.)Google Scholar
Adams, Perng Wang & Tomioka, Satoshi. 2012. Sluicing in Mandarin Chinese: An instance of pseudo-sluicing. In Merchant, Jason & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), Sluicing: Cross-linguistic perspectives, 219–247. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Stephen Robert. 1991. On the semantics and logical form of WH-clauses. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cheng, Lisa Lai Shen. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cheung, Yam-Leung. 2008. The negative wh-construction. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Some empirical issues in the theory of Transformational Grammar. In Peters, Stanley (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory, 63–130. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. & McCloskey, James. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3(3). 239–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2). 337–362.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Yoshiki. 2020. Sprouting: A key to unifying Japanese sluicing. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 26(1). 87–96. (Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Penn Linguistics Conference.)
Fukaya, Teruhiko & Hoji, Hajime. 1999. Stripping and sluicing in Japanese and some implications. In Bird, Sonya & Carnie, Andrew & Haugen, Jason D. & Norquest, Peter (eds.), WCCFL 18: Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 145–158. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2008. Wh-movement in Japanese: Matrix sluicing is different from embedded sluicing. In Boeckx, Cedric & Ulutas, Suleyman (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 4) (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 56), 63–74. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1987. Where does the definiteness restriction apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In Reuland, Eric & ter Meulen, Alice (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 21–42. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken & Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Missing links: Cleft, sluicing, and “no da” construction in Japanese. In Ionin, Tania & Ko, Heejeong & Nevins, Andrew (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd HUMIT Student Conference in Language Research (HUMIT 2001) (The MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 43), 35–54. Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.Google Scholar
. 1988. On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 59(1). 43–64.Google Scholar
. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Kenneth (eds.), The Null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Modularity and Chinese A-not-A questions. In Georgopoulos, Carol & Ishihara, Roberta (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 305–332. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2002. Towards an etiology of adjunct islands. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans. 1984. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Groenendijk, Jeroen, & Janssen, Theo M. V. & Stokhof, Martin (eds.), Truth, interpretation, and information: Selected papers from the Third Amsterdam colloquium, 1–42. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Merchant, Jason. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(1). 89–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kizu, Mika. 2005. Cleft constructions in Japanese syntax. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuwabara, Kazuki. 1996. Multiple wh-phrases in elliptical clauses and some aspects of clefts with multiple foci. In Koizumi, Masatoshi & Oishi, Masayuki & Sauerland, Uli (eds.), Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 2: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (The MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29), 97–116. Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Kim, Minjoo & Strauss, Uli (eds.), NELS 31: Proceedings of the 31th Conference of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 21, 301–320. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1992. Indefinite wh in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11. 125–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Wei, Ting-Chi. 2017. Sluicing, sprouting and missing objects. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 38(2). 63–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Chi-Ming Louis. 2022. (Embedded) short answers to wh-questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31(3). 351–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, Anne C. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Subject-auxiliary inversion in comparatives and PF output constraints. In Schwabe, Kerstin & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures, 55–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6). 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Sluicing. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 271–291. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Binnick, Rober & Davison, Alice & Green, Georgia & Morgan, Jerry (eds.), Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1999. On lexical courtesy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 81. 39–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Minimal restrictions on Basque movements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 171. 403–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Lipták, Anikó. 2009. What sluicing can do, what it can’t and in which language: On the cross-linguistic syntax of ellipsis. Leiden: Leiden University/Utrecht University. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1972. Anaphoric relations in English. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Wang, Chyan-an Arthur. 2002. On sluicing in Mandarin Chinese. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Master’s thesis.)
Wang, Chyan-an Arthur & Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2006. Sluicing and focus movement in wh-in-situ languages. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12(1). 375–387.Google Scholar
Wei, Ting-Chi. 2004. Predication and sluicing in Mandarin Chinese. Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2011. Island repair effects of the left branch condition in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20(3). 255–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin S. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 101–139.Google Scholar
Yang, Chung-Yu Barry. 2015. Locating wh-intervention effects at CP. In Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 11), 153–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar