Light predicate raising in the Mandarin post-VP adverbial nominal constructions
In Mandarin, a nominal may follow a string that is composed of a monomorphemic verb and its monomorphemic object. The nominal exhibits the same constraints as a preverbal PP. Also, unlike a canonical or non-canonical object, such a nominal cannot be deleted. It is argued that such a nominal is the object of a preposition; the PP is base-generated as a left adverbial of a shortest transitive VP; and after the leftward raising of the light VP and deletion of the preposition, the nominal surfaces to the right of the VP. Based on this study, the paper reports a form economy in syntactic operations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Major differences of V-PONs from O-PONs
- 3.The non-object properties of V-PONs
- 3.1Various adverbial readings of V-PONs
- 3.2A. The same combination restriction on a preverbal PP
- 3.3B. The same interpretation as a preverbal PP
- 3.4C. The ban on ellipsis
- 4.The VP status and the lightness of the VO string to the left of a V-PON
- 4.1The VO string as a VP
- 4.2The minimal length of a syntactic element
- 5.Two flawed analyses of V-PONs
- 5.1The V-PON construction as a double object construction?
- 5.2A V-PON as the object of a VO string?
- 6.Proposal: Light predicate raising
- 6.1The non-canonical order in extraposition constructions
- 6.2PP-Stranding in V-PON constructions
- 6.3The forms of certain prepositions in the pre- and post-verbal positions
- 6.4Against the light verb analysis of an implicit preposition
- 7.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References