Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2017) ► pp.296325
References (25)
References
Ahn, Mikyung, & Foong Ha Yap. 2014. On the development of Korean SAY evidentials and their extended pragmatic functions. Diachronica 31.3:299–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koc, Ayhan A., & Dan I Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, 159–167. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Harima, Keiko. 1993. ‘Totemo’ ‘Zenzen’ nado ni mirareru fukushi no yōhō hensen no ichi ruikei [A study of development of usages of adverbs on ‘totemo’, ‘zenzen’ and so forth]. Gobun Kenkyū [ Research on Language and Literature ] 751:11–22.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.11, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H., Jr. 1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, 3–28. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Konoshima, Masatosohi. 1973. Kokugo Jodooshi no Kenkyuu: Taikei to Rekishi [ A Study on Auxiliary Verbs in Japanese: Syntax and History ]. Tokyo: Oofusha.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol. 1976. Evidence for syntactic reanalysis: from verb to complementizer in Kwa. Papers from the Parassession on Diachronic Syntax: April 22, 1976, ed. by Sanford B. Steever, 179–191. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Moriwaki, Shigehide. 1995. Joji tote no seiritsu katei, imi yoohoo wo megutte (2) [On the development and semantic usages of postpositional particle tote (2)]. Yamaguchi Kokubun 181:69–82.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu, Satake Akihiro, & Kingoroo Maeda. 1990. Iwanami Kogojiten [ Iwanami Dictionary of Classical Japanese ]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis ( Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132 ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saxena, Anju. 1988. On syntactic convergence: the case of the verb ‘say’ in Tibeto-Burman. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, ed. by Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster, 375–388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Shinmura, Izuru. 1940. Nihon no Kotoba [ The Language in Japan ]. Tokyo: Sogensha.Google Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2014. Amari/Anmari/Anma and Totemo/Tottemo in history and discourse: interaction of negative polarity and positive polarity. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney, & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. The Limits of Grammaticalization, ed. by Anne Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper, 229–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamaji, Mizuho. 2015. Nihongo ni okeru denbunshookosei no maakaa to ‘goiteki inyoo koozoo’ no hikaku: tsuuji goyooronteki kanten kara [A comparison of hearsay evidential marker and lexical quotative constructions in Japanese: a diachronic-pragmatic perspective]. Goyooron Kenkyuu [ Studies in Pragmatics ] 171:17–32.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., & Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 21, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL 1995), August 13–18, 1995. Manchester: University of Manchester.
. 1997. UNLESS and BUT conditionals: a historical perspective. On Conditionals Again, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven, 145–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens, 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, & Richard B. Dasher. 2001. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yu-Fang, Aya Katz, & Chih-Hua Chen. 2003. Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences 25.5:457–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12.1:51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Yoshio. 1936. Nihon Bunpoogaku Gairon [ An Introduction to Japanese Grammar ]. Tokyo: Hoobunkan.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Kanehiko. 1970. Setsuzokujoshi te(tote), shite, de, tsutsu, nagara, ya(shi)(temo) [Connective particle te(tote), shite, de, tsutsu, nagara, ya(shi)(temo)]. Kokubungaku Kaishaku to Kanshoo [ Interpretation and Appreciation of Japanese Literature ] 35.13:67–77.Google Scholar
Yoshii, Ken. 1993. Kokugo fukushi no shiteki kenkyuu – “totemo” no goshi [A diachronic study on Japanese adverb: the case of ‘totemo’]. Bunrin 271:1–30.Google Scholar