Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.65101
References (37)
References
Ackermann, Kirsten & Yuhua Chen. 2013. Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121. 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsop, Siân & Hilary Nesi. 2013. The summarising function of university Engineering lectures: A cross-cultural perspective. In Alasdair N. Archibald (ed.), Multilingual theory and practice in applied linguistics, 11–14. London: Scitsiugnil Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (version 3.4.3) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL].
. 2017. AntCorGen (version 1.1.0) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Biber, Douglas & Frederica Barbieri. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written register. English for Specific Purposes 261. 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd & Marie Helt. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 361. 9–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Björkman, Beyza. 2008. English as a lingua franca of engineering: The morphosyntax of academic speech events. Nordic Journal of English Studies 71. 103–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh. 2018. English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes 371. 34–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 2017. From a plate of spaghetti to a cable-stayed bridge: Increasing the impact of corpus linguistics in disciplinary education. Plenary presentation, Corpus Linguistics 2017, Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Available at [URL].
Cortes, Vivian. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 231. 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Philip. 2017. Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 381. 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 2015. John Swales’s approach to pedagogy in genre analysis: A perspective from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191. 102–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 111. 52–63. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016. A genre-instantiation approach to teaching English for specific academic purposes: Student writing in business, economics and engineering. Writing and Pedagogy 81. 117–144. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber. 2018. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. The Language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin. (eds.) 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Bristol & London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Huang, Pingyu. 2017. Academic collocations in computer science research articles: A corpus-based study. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2017, University of Birmingham.
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 131. 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 271. 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2015. Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes 371. 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra. 2006. Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51. 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunter. 2000. Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly 341. 337–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1990. Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy for a changing world, 166–202. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Robert Veel. (eds.). 1998. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Michael A. K. Halliday. 2009. Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Mudraya, Olga. 2006. Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes 251. 235–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2006. Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. British Studies in Applied Linguistics 211. 99–117.Google Scholar
Pan, Fan, Randi Reppen & Douglas Biber. 2016. Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 211. 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezoug, Fares & Benet Vincent. 2018. Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering (ACE). Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics 31. 47–77.Google Scholar
Rozycki, William & Neil H. Johnson. 2013. Non-canonical grammar in best paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 321. 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Yuchih. 2013. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detecting software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121. 264–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Simon & John Flowerdew. 2016. Participatory genre analysis of statements of purpose: An identity focused study. Writing and Pedagogy 81. 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Alistair. 2001. International scientific English. In John Flowerdew & Matthew Peacock (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, 71–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Pan, Fan & Yiying Yang
2024. Diachronic changes in the phrasal complexity of research articles (1970–2020): a cross-disciplinary investigation. Scientometrics 129:7  pp. 4395 ff. DOI logo
Simpson-Smith, Claire
2024. Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 29:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana & Anthony Becker
2020. The use of lexical patterns in engineering. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95],  pp. 228 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.