Engineering registers in the 21st century
SFL perspectives on online publications
Following an exploration of engineering programmes in higher education, and a review of literature on engineering registers, genres
and disciplines, this paper asks if there is a register for engineering. Word frequencies, n-grams and frequent n-grams in context
were analysed in a 7.3 million word corpus created from four sections (Introduction, Materials & Methods, Results &
Discussion, Conclusion) of over 1000 articles in civil, electrical and mechanical engineering. From the perspective of systemic
functional linguistics, this reveals how engineering is construed through language that reflects the social context of high
impact, open access, multi-modal, 21st century, international journal article publication, with multiple author roles, and
prescribed genres, where reviewers focus on problem solving and facts, rather than persuasive claims.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1What is engineering?
- 1.2What do engineers do?
- 1.3What characterises the disciplinary practices of engineering?
- 2.The social context of engineering
- 2.1Engineering careers
- 2.2Professional accrediting bodies
- 2.3University courses
- 2.4University faculties, schools and departments of engineering
- 3.Empirical studies on the language of engineering
- 3.1Engineering compared to other disciplines
- 3.2Engineering genres and registers compared
- 4.Halliday’s theories about scientific registers
- 4.1Grammatical metaphor
- 4.2The phylogenetic development of scientific language
- 5.Methodology
- 5.1An online engineering corpus
- 5.2Procedures for word lists and lexical bundles
- 6.Results
- 6.1Word lists
- 6.2N-grams
- 6.2.1N-grams in introductions
- 6.2.2N-grams in materials and methods
- 6.2.3N-grams in results and discussion
- 7.N-grams in context
- 7.1Introductions in engineering
- 7.2Materials and methods in engineering
- 7.3Results and discussions in engineering
- 7.4Conclusions in engineering
- 8.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (37)
References
Ackermann, Kirsten & Yuhua Chen. 2013. Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121. 235–247.
Alsop, Siân & Hilary Nesi. 2013. The summarising function of university Engineering lectures: A cross-cultural perspective. In Alasdair N. Archibald (ed.), Multilingual theory and practice in applied linguistics, 11–14. London: Scitsiugnil Press.
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (version 3.4.3) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL].
Anthony, Laurence. 2017. AntCorGen (version 1.1.0) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Biber, Douglas & Frederica Barbieri. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written register. English for Specific Purposes 261. 263–286.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd & Marie Helt. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 361. 9–48.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
Björkman, Beyza. 2008. English as a lingua franca of engineering: The morphosyntax of academic speech events. Nordic Journal of English Studies 71. 103–122.
Canagarajah, Suresh. 2018. English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes 371. 34–50.
Conrad, Susan. 2017. From a plate of spaghetti to a cable-stayed bridge: Increasing the impact of corpus linguistics in disciplinary education. Plenary presentation, Corpus Linguistics 2017, Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Available at [URL].
Cortes, Vivian. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 231. 397–423.
Durrant, Philip. 2017. Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 381. 165–193.
Flowerdew, John. 2015. John Swales’s approach to pedagogy in genre analysis: A perspective from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191. 102–112.
Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 111. 52–63. .
Gardner, Sheena. 2016. A genre-instantiation approach to teaching English for specific academic purposes: Student writing in business, economics and engineering. Writing and Pedagogy 81. 117–144. .
Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber. 2018. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. The Language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London/New York: Continuum.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin. (eds.) 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Bristol & London: Falmer.
Huang, Pingyu. 2017. Academic collocations in computer science research articles: A corpus-based study. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2017, University of Birmingham.
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 131. 133–151.
Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 271. 4–21.
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2015. Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes 371. 74–86.
Koutsantoni, Dimitra. 2006. Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51. 19–36.
Kress, Gunter. 2000. Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly 341. 337–340.
Martin, James R. 1990. Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy for a changing world, 166–202. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Martin, James R. & Robert Veel. (eds.). 1998. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Michael A. K. Halliday. 2009. Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Mudraya, Olga. 2006. Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes 251. 235–256.
Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2006. Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. British Studies in Applied Linguistics 211. 99–117.
Pan, Fan, Randi Reppen & Douglas Biber. 2016. Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 211. 60–71.
Rezoug, Fares & Benet Vincent. 2018. Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering (ACE). Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics 31. 47–77.
Rozycki, William & Neil H. Johnson. 2013. Non-canonical grammar in best paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 321. 157–169.
Sun, Yuchih. 2013. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detecting software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121. 264–272.
Wang, Simon & John Flowerdew. 2016. Participatory genre analysis of statements of purpose: An identity focused study. Writing and Pedagogy 81. 33–57.
Wood, Alistair. 2001. International scientific English. In John Flowerdew & Matthew Peacock (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, 71–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pan, Fan & Yiying Yang
2024.
Diachronic changes in the phrasal complexity of research articles (1970–2020): a cross-disciplinary investigation.
Scientometrics 129:7
► pp. 4395 ff.
Simpson-Smith, Claire
2024.
Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills.
Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 29:1
► pp. 30 ff.
Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana & Anthony Becker
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.