Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.65–101

Engineering registers in the 21st century

SFL perspectives on online publications

ORCID logo | Coventry University
ORCID logo | City University of Hong Kong

Following an exploration of engineering programmes in higher education, and a review of literature on engineering registers, genres and disciplines, this paper asks if there is a register for engineering. Word frequencies, n-grams and frequent n-grams in context were analysed in a 7.3 million word corpus created from four sections (Introduction, Materials & Methods, Results & Discussion, Conclusion) of over 1000 articles in civil, electrical and mechanical engineering. From the perspective of systemic functional linguistics, this reveals how engineering is construed through language that reflects the social context of high impact, open access, multi-modal, 21st century, international journal article publication, with multiple author roles, and prescribed genres, where reviewers focus on problem solving and facts, rather than persuasive claims.

Keywords: academic English, engineering register, corpus linguistics, systemic functional linguistics, research article genre, English as a lingua franca, online publication contexts, word frequencies, n-grams, frequent n-grams in context
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1What is engineering?
    • 1.2What do engineers do?
    • 1.3What characterises the disciplinary practices of engineering?
  • 2.The social context of engineering
    • 2.1Engineering careers
    • 2.2Professional accrediting bodies
    • 2.3University courses
    • 2.4University faculties, schools and departments of engineering
  • 3.Empirical studies on the language of engineering
    • 3.1Engineering compared to other disciplines
    • 3.2Engineering genres and registers compared
  • 4.Halliday’s theories about scientific registers
    • 4.1Grammatical metaphor
    • 4.2The phylogenetic development of scientific language
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1An online engineering corpus
    • 5.2Procedures for word lists and lexical bundles
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Word lists
    • 6.2N-grams
      • 6.2.1N-grams in introductions
      • 6.2.2N-grams in materials and methods
      • 6.2.3N-grams in results and discussion
  • 7.N-grams in context
    • 7.1Introductions in engineering
    • 7.2Materials and methods in engineering
    • 7.3Results and discussions in engineering
    • 7.4Conclusions in engineering
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 4 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00004.gar
References
Ackermann, Kirsten & Yuhua Chen
2013 Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121. 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsop, Siân & Hilary Nesi
2013 The summarising function of university Engineering lectures: A cross-cultural perspective. In Alasdair N. Archibald (ed.), Multilingual theory and practice in applied linguistics, 11–14. London: Scitsiugnil Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2014 AntConc (version 3.4.3) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL].
2017 AntCorGen (version 1.1.0) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Biber, Douglas & Frederica Barbieri
2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written register. English for Specific Purposes 261. 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd & Marie Helt
2002 Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 361. 9–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2009 Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Björkman, Beyza
2008 English as a lingua franca of engineering: The morphosyntax of academic speech events. Nordic Journal of English Studies 71. 103–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh
2018 English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes 371. 34–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan
2017 From a plate of spaghetti to a cable-stayed bridge: Increasing the impact of corpus linguistics in disciplinary education. Plenary presentation, Corpus Linguistics 2017, Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Available at [URL].
Cortes, Vivian
2004 Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 231. 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Philip
2017 Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 381. 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John
2015 John Swales’s approach to pedagogy in genre analysis: A perspective from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191. 102–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena
2012 Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 111. 52–63. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2016 A genre-instantiation approach to teaching English for specific academic purposes: Student writing in business, economics and engineering. Writing and Pedagogy 81. 117–144. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber
2018 Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
2004 The Language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
(eds.) 1993 Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Bristol & London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Huang, Pingyu
2017 Academic collocations in computer science research articles: A corpus-based study. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2017, University of Birmingham.
Hyland, Ken
2000 Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2004 Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 131. 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 271. 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
2015 Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes 371. 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2006 Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51. 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunter
2000 Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly 341. 337–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
1990 Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy for a changing world, 166–202. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Robert Veel
(eds.) 1998 Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Michael A. K. Halliday
2009 Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Mudraya, Olga
2006 Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes 251. 235–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner
2006 Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. British Studies in Applied Linguistics 211. 99–117.Google Scholar
Pan, Fan, Randi Reppen & Douglas Biber
2016 Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 211. 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezoug, Fares & Benet Vincent
2018 Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering (ACE). Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics 31. 47–77.Google Scholar
Rozycki, William & Neil H. Johnson
2013 Non-canonical grammar in best paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 321. 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Yuchih
2013 Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detecting software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121. 264–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Simon & John Flowerdew
2016 Participatory genre analysis of statements of purpose: An identity focused study. Writing and Pedagogy 81. 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Alistair
2001 International scientific English. In John Flowerdew & Matthew Peacock (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, 71–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana & Anthony Becker
2020. The use of lexical patterns in engineering. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Simpson-Smith, Claire
2023. Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.