Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.102120
References
Abbott, H. Porter
2002The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayers, David
2008Literary theory, a reintroduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brewton, Vince
ed. n.d. Literary theory Retrieved September 23, 2017 from [URL]
Christie, Michael J.
1985Aboriginal perspectives on experience and learning: The role of language in aboriginal education. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T.
(text of 1834) The rime of the ancient mariner. Retrievable from [URL].
Dale, Leigh
2012The enchantment of English, professing English literatures in Australian universities (2nd edition). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Dolin, Tim, Jo Jones & Patricia Dowsett
2017Required reading, literature in Australian schools since 1945. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
Eaglestone, Robert
2009Doing English, a guide for literature students (3rd edition). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry
1983Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fraser, Julius T.
2007Time and time again, reports from a boundary of the universe. Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goring, Paul, Jeremy Hawthorn & Domhnall Mitchell
2001Studying literature, the essential companion. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hall, Donald E.
(ed.) 2001Professions, conversations on the future of literary and cultural studies. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1964The linguistic study of literary texts. In Horace Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, 302–307. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2002The linguistic study of literary texts. In Michael A. K. Halliday’s Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 5–22. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1999Construing experience through meaning. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004Introduction to functional grammar (3rd edition). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985Linguistics, language and verbal art. Deakin, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Huisman, Rosemary
1998 hb; 2000 pbThe written poem, semiotic conventions from Old to Modern English. London & New York: Cassell (hb); Continuum (pb).Google Scholar
2013The origins of language and narrative temporalities. In Raji C. Steineck & Claudia Clausius (eds.), Origins and futures: Time inflected and reflected, 49–76. Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015How do you write about what is not there? How do you record what is absent? Scraping the temporal palimpsest in Auster’s fiction. In Arkadiusz Misztal (ed.), Time, narrative, and imagination: Essays on Paul Auster, 271–291. Gdansk: Gdansk University Press.Google Scholar
2016Talking about poetry – using the model of language in systemic functional linguistics to talk about poetic texts. English in Australia 51(2). 7–19.Google Scholar
2017Facing the eternal desert: Sociotemporal values in Old English poetry. Kronoscope 17(2). 231–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huisman, Rosemary, Helen Fulton, Julian Murphet & Anne Dunn
2005Narrative and media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Sally, Louise Droga & Susan Feez
2012Grammar and meaning. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1985Verbal art, verbal sign, verbal time. Edited by Krystyna Pomorska & Stephen Rudy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kent, Hannah
2013Burial rites. Sydney: Picador.Google Scholar
Kramer-Dahl, Anneliese
1999The ‘slender technique’ of reproducing educational disadvantage: the discourse of English literature examiners’ reports. Journal of. Intercultural Studies 20(2). 125–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, Armin
2009What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Working Paper Series 03/09. Retrieved from [URL].
Kusch, Celena E.
2009Literary studies and interpreting literary texts. Retrieved from [URL].
2016Literary analysis: The basics. Abingdon & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle, Alison R. Moore, Maria Herke, Rebekah Wegener & Canzhong Wu
2008Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2).187–213.Google Scholar
Lowry, Howard F.
(ed.) 1932The letters of Matthew Arnold to Arthur Hugh Clough, letter 51, 1853: 146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Donald G.
1992Literary interpretation. In Joseph Gibaldi (ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures (2nd edition), 159–182. New York: Modern Languages Association of America.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
2003Making history, grammar for interpretation. In James R. Martin & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London & Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2009Ideas and new directions. In Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 12–58. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2015aRegister in the round: registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics 2(9): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
2015bGrammatical realizations of rhetorical relations in different registers. Word 61(3). 232–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMurty, Jo
1985English language, English Literature, the creation of an academic discipline. London: Mansell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Poetry Foundation
ed. Matthew Arnold Retrieved from [URL]
Study English at ANU: Literature, film, drama and creative writing
2017 Retrieved September 21, 2017, from [URL].
Underwood, Ted
2013Why literary periods mattered, historical contrast and the prestige of English studies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vacca, Raffaele
2015Co-citations in social networks and network science. Under webpage heading What is an academic field? Using co-citation networks to map scientific literature over time. Retrieved from [URL].
Willatt, Edward
2010Defining a discipline. Retrieved from [URL].
Wisker, Gina
2007Key concepts in postcolonial literature. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Tory
2008Studying English Literature, a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar