Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.313–340

Covert modernist techniques in Australian fiction

A systemic functional reading of Peter Carey’s American dreams

ORCID logo | Macquarie University
Peter Carey’s short story American dreams (Carey 1994 [1974]) presents a recalibration of consciousness as a small Australian town gradually becomes Americanized. The text foregrounds epistemological concerns by demonstrating a clear tendency toward delayed understanding. For this reason, I argue that the story is an instance of modernist fiction: a label not previously applied to Carey’s stories. In contrast with popular modernist techniques such as free indirect discourse and stream of consciousness, the techniques presented in the text appear to be covert, which may at least partially explain why the story has managed to avoid being labelled modernist by literary critics until now. Using analytical tools grounded in systemic functional grammar and appraisal categories, I demonstrate how linguistic analysis can lay bare the covert modernist techniques at work in the story, indicating that such an approach can be a useful complement to non-linguistic literary criticism.
Keywords: systemic functional linguistics, stylistics, appraisal, attitude, prosodic realization, Peter Carey, American dreams , Australian literature, short story, modernist fiction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Modernist fiction and linguistic analysis
  • 3. American dreams and literary classification
  • 4.Plot synopsis
  • 5.Delayed understanding through thematic structure
  • 6.Delayed understanding through process types
  • 7.Delayed understanding through lexis
  • 8.Developmental editing and its effect on the text
  • 9.Delayed understanding in the context of Australian modernism
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00013.til
References (37)
References
Adami, Valentina. 2009. The role of the reader in Peter Carey’s and Frank Moorehouse’s 1970s short stories. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 20(2). 177–184.Google Scholar
Ahearne, Kate, Stephen Williams & Kevin Brophy. 1980. An interview with Peter Carey. Going Down Swinging 11. 43–55.Google Scholar
Bell, Philip & Roger Bell. 1993. Implicated: The United States in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. Introduction: The dilemmas of ‘Americanisation’. In Philip Bell & Roger Bell (eds.), Americanization and Australia, 1–14. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Peter. 1994 [1974]. The fat man in history. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
. 1974. The wall that Gleason built. Nation Review, February 1–7. 496–497.Google Scholar
Carter, David. 1984. Modernism and Australian literature. World Literature Written in English 24(1). 158–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1). 37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among raters. Philosophical Bulletin 76(5). 378–382.Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo. 2015. A step-wise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language 25(2). 1–26.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 2003 [1964]. The linguistic study of literary texts. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 7–22. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2003 [1971]. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors . In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 88–125. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Milton Park: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. Linguistics, language, and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hassall, Anthony J. 1994. Dancing on hot macadam: Peter Carey’s fiction. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Head, Dominic. 1992. The modernist short story: A study in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, David. 2011. Emergence of mind: Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huisman, Rosemary. 2013. The origins of language and narrative temporalities. In Raji C. Steinback & Claudia Clausius (eds.), Origins and futures: Time inflected and reflected, 49–78. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1935]. The dominant. In Ladislav Matejka & Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views, 82–87. Chicago: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, Karen. 1992. Peter Carey: The genesis of fame. Pymble: Angus & Robertson.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Michael Short. 1981. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (1st edition). Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2007. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd edition). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lever, Susan. 1998. Fiction: Innovation and ideology. In Bruce Bennett, Jennifer Strauss & Chris Wallace-Crabbe (eds.), The Oxford literary history of Australia, 308–331. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle & Adriana Pagano. 2016. Inner and outer worlds: Speech and thought presentation in Mansfield’s Bliss . Journal of Literary Semantics 45(2). 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHale, Brian. 1987. Postmodernist fiction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Craig. 1976. Building the fabulist extensions. Makar 12(1). 3–12.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Nathaniel. 2002. The voice of the teller: A conversation with Peter Carey. Antipodes 16(2). 164–167.Google Scholar
Ommundsen, Wenche. 1993. Metafictions?: Reflexivity in contemporary texts. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Rubik, Margarete. 2005. Provocative and unforgettable: Peter Carey’s short fiction: A cognitive approach. European Journal of English Studies 9(2). 169–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Cornelia. 2005. Peter Carey’s short stories: Trapped in a narrative labyrinth. In Andreas Gaile (ed.), Fabulating beauty: Perspectives on the fiction of Peter Carey, 117–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Shiach, Morag. 2012. Beyond autonomy: Political dimensions of modernist novels. In Robert L. Caserio & Clement Hawes (eds.), The Cambridge history of the English novel, 629–644. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sotirova, Violeta. 2011. DH Lawrence and narrative viewpoint. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tilney, Martin. 2018. Cohesive harmony and theme in Peter Carey’s ‘The last days of a famous mime’. Language and Literature 27(1). 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. 2015. Appraisal theory. In Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd Sandel (eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1–7. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hobby, Nathan & Van Ikin
2020. Australia. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 55:4 ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.