Is there a role for prosody within register studies
And if so what and how?
This article examines whether the incorporation of prosody within register studies can lead to a richer description of what speakers can mean in a specific environment. In order to situate how prosody resets the probabilities of contextual variables, a number of texts are examined and it is argued that prosodic systems at and above the rank of tone group are meaningful and situated on the content plane. The article concludes by suggesting some redrawing of the standard SFL stratification model by arguing that the view that meaning redounds with wording which in turn redounds with sounding needs some revision to incorporate the higher units of the phonological rank scale being situated on the content plane.
Keywords: register, prosody, stratification, redundancy, realisation, context, system, phonological rank scale, potential, instance, articulation, spoken and written language
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Register within the SFL architecture of language
- 3.Meaning making in written and oral texts
- 3.1The weather-forecast texts
- 3.2The political statement
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (44)
References
Bache, Carl. 2010. Hjelmslev’s glossematics: A source of inspiration for systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 421. 2562–2578. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 2013. Towards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, Paul & David Weenick. 2013. Praat doing phonetics by computer. Computer programme Version 5.3.52.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brazil, David. 1997. The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Canalis, Stefano. 2007. A note on the influence of Louis Hjelmslev’s suprasegmental phonology. ICPhS XVI Saarbrücken.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cauldwell, Richard T. 1999. Openings rhythm and relationships: Philip Larkin reads Mr Bleaney. Language and Literature 81(11). 35–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corballis, Michael C. 2017. The truth about language: What it is and where it came from. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsen, Hike. 2017. The two meanings of sound symbolism. Open Linguistics 31. 491–499. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garvin, Paul L. 1954. Review of a prolegomena to a theory of language by Louis Hjelmslev. Language 30(1). 69–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1975. Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2002. How do you mean? In Michael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 352–368. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2003. On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2005. The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & William S. Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1996. Semantic networks: A tool for the analysis of meaning. In Carmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning, 104–127. London: Cassell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1963. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1975. Resume to a theory of language. Madison, Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, Jay. 1995. Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. Forthcoming. The architecture of phonology according to systemic functional linguistics. In The collected works of Christian Matthiessen. London: Equinox.
Moore, Alison. 2017. Register analysis in systemic functional linguistics. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 418–437. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A grammar of spoken English: The intonation of increments. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Grady, Gerard. 2012. Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Grady, Gerard. 2014. An investigation of how intonation helps signal information structure. In Wendy S. Bowcher & Bradley Smith (eds.), Systemic phonology: Recent studies in English, 27–52. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Grady, Gerard. 2017a. Intonation and systemic functional linguistics: The way forward. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 146–162. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taverniers, Miriam. 2011. The syntax–semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1100–1126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tench, Paul. 1996. The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thibault, Paul. 2004. Brain, mind and the signifying body. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, Anne. 2000. Intonation in text and discourse: Beginnings middles and ends. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willett, Michael. 2015. A study in the productivity of 12 onset English phonaesthemes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cardiff University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
O’Grady, Gerard
2023.
Theme in spoken language: when a tone group is not a clause.
Journal of World Languages 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ariztimuño, Lilián I., Shoshana Dreyfus & Alison Rotha Moore
2022.
Emotion in speech.
Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:2
► pp. 335 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Doran, Yaegan J., David Caldwell & Andrew S. Ross
2021.
Language in action.
Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 3:2
► pp. 274 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.