Article published in:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp. 5990
References

[ p. 82 ]References

Bache, Carl
2010Hjelmslev’s glossematics: A source of inspiration for systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2562–2578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
2013Towards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction 9. 33–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenick
2013Praat doing phonetics by computer. Computer programme Version 5.3.52.Google Scholar
Brazil, David
1997The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canalis, Stefano
2007A note on the influence of Louis Hjelmslev’s suprasegmental phonology. ICPhS XVI Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, Richard T.
1999Openings rhythm and relationships: Philip Larkin reads Mr Bleaney. Language and Literature 8(1). 35–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corballis, Michael C.
2017The truth about language: What it is and where it came from. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsen, Hike
2017The two meanings of sound symbolism. Open Linguistics 3. 491–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul L.
1954Review of a prolegomena to a theory of language by Louis Hjelmslev. Language 30(1). 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 83 ]
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2002How do you mean? In Michael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 352–368. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2003On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & William S. Greaves
2008Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1989Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens
1964The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014An introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1996Semantic networks: A tool for the analysis of meaning. In Carmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning, 104–127. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1963Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
1975Resume to a theory of language. Madison, Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay
1995Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
1995Lexicogrammatical cartography. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The architecture of phonology according to systemic functional linguistics. In The collected works of Christian Matthiessen. London: Equinox.
Moore, Alison
2017Register analysis in systemic functional linguistics. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 418–437. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2009Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language 16. 225–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 84 ]
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A grammar of spoken English: The intonation of increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2012Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2014An investigation of how intonation helps signal information structure. In Wendy S. Bowcher & Bradley Smith (eds.), Systemic phonology: Recent studies in English, 27–52. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2017aIntonation and systemic functional linguistics: The way forward. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 146–162. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017bTheme and prosody: Redundancy and meaning making. English Text Construction 10(2). 274–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2011The syntax–semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1100–1126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tench, Paul
1996The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
2003Processes of semogenesis in English. Functions of Language 10(2). 209–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul
2004Brain, mind and the signifying body. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2000Intonation in text and discourse: Beginnings middles and ends. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Willett, Michael
2015A study in the productivity of 12 onset English phonaesthemes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cardiff University.Google Scholar