Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.80107
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
2008 (eds.). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2003Constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Broccias, Critiano
2008Towards a history of English resultative constructions: The case of adjectival resultative constructions. English Language and Linguistics 12(1). 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Richard D. Janda
2001Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23(2–3). 93–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeVriend, Hubert J.
1984 (ed.). The Old English Herbarium and Medicina de Quadrupedibus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Shengli
1998Prosodic structure and compound words in Classical Chinese. In Jerome Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation, 197–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Geuder, Wilhelm
2000Oriented adverbs: Issues in the lexical semantics of event adverbs. PhD dissertation. Universitat Tubingen, Germany.
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967Notes on transitivity and Theme in English (Part 1). Journal of Linguistics 31. 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988On the language of physical science. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English, 162–177. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
1993Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 69–85. London: FalmerGoogle Scholar
1994An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2008Complementarities in language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. with Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1992Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language 161. 335–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollmann, Willem B.
2003Synchrony and diachrony of English periphrastic causatives: A cognitive perspective. PhD dissertation. The University of Manchester, England.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1977Syntactic reanalysis. In C. N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munchen: LINCOM EUROPA.Google Scholar
2015Thoughts on grammaticalization (3rd edition). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W.
1979Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2004Corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Statistics, frequencies, and beyond. In H. Lindquist & C. Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–150. (Studies in corpus linguistics, 13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985Old English syntax, volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1988Typology of resultative constructions. (Translated from the original Russian edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14 (2). 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1999Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, volume 3: 1476 – 1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916Cours de linguistique generale. Lausanne: PayotGoogle Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi
2015The evolution of Chinese grammar. Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint
1999The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tham, Shiao Wei
2015Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin. In William S-Y. Wang & Sun Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 306–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1977Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 141–177. Austin, Texas: University of Texas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericicus T.
1963An historical syntax of the English language, volume 1. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wang, Li
1980Hanyu shigao. (An outline of Chinese language history). Beijing: China Book Company.Google Scholar
Yang, Yanning
2019The change of constructions in Old Chinese and Old English: A study from the perspective of non-compositionality. Foreign Language and Literature Studies 51. 451–464.Google Scholar
Zoe Wu, Xiu-Zhi
2004Grammaticalization and language change in Chinese: A formal view. (Routledge Curzon Asian Linguistics Series). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Zou, Ke
1994Resultative V-V compounds in Chinese. In Heidi Harley & Colin Phillips (eds.), The morphology-syntax connection: MIT working papers in linguistics 22 1, 271–290. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar