Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.161–192

Graduating points of view in Spanish written language

The role of modality

ORCID logo | Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Chile
This paper focuses on some language resources for graduating points of view in written Spanish language in the field of history. The analysis is framed in systemic functional linguistic theory, a multifunctional theory of language (Halliday with Matthiessen 2014), and focuses on the appraisal system, which organises interpersonal meanings at the stratum of discourse semantics in language (Martin and White 2005; Martin 2019; White 2021). In particular, it considers the coupling and necessary complementarity of graduation and engagement subsystems, as part of the appraisal system, for building intersubjectivity in texts. To achieve this purpose, the analysis explores the role of the Spanish lexicogrammatical system of modality (modalisation and modulation) in the construction of dialogicity in historical documents.
Keywords: appraisal , engagement , graduation , Spanish modality , dialogicity, discourse of history
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and methodological framework
    • 2.1The graduation system
    • 2.2The engagement system
    • 2.3Graduation “meets” engagement: The role of mood and modality
  • 3.Analysis: Graduating points of view in a Spanish written historical document
    • 3.1Analysis of the establishment of the mission and role of the Commission
    • 3.2Principles that guided the task of the Commission: Plurality and diversity
    • 3.3Historical contextualisation: Suffering of indigenous peoples
    • 3.4Historical contextualisation: Relationship between the Chilean State and the indigenous peoples
    • 3.5Difficulties encountered by the Commission in fulfilling its duty
    • 3.6Current principles of a democratic society
    • 3.7Establishing the meaning of the “New Treatment”: The Commission proposal
  • 4.Final remarks
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 26 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00045.ote
References (43)
References
Boccara, Guillaume & Paola Bolados. 2010. ¿Qué es el multiculturalismo? La Nueva Cuestión Étnica en el Chile Neoliberal. Revista de Indias LXX(250). 651–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Violeta Demonte. 1999. (eds.). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Caffarel, Alice, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. Language typology: A functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castro, Claudia & Teresa Oteíza. 2022. Historical explanations in the Rettig Report: The role of interpersonal grammatical metaphors. Discourse & Society 33(5). 581–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, Caroline. 2006. Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
De Cock, Barbara & Daniel Michaud. 2018. Discursive construction of human rights violations: the case of the Chilean Rettig report. Text & Talk 38(1). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2014. Manual de gramática del español. Buenos Aires: Waldhuter editores.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Rosa María. 2010. Especialización del discurso: Una caracterización desde el sistema de la obligación. RLA 48(1).105–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2003[1992]. Systemic grammar and the concept of a “science of language”. In M. A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 199–212. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. with Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, Susan. 2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Appraisal. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 382–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arúz Hita & Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2010. Systemic functional grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English, volume II. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. Macro-proposals: Meaning by degree. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Description: Diverse analyses of a fund-raising text, 359–395. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Discourse semantics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 358–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Clare Painter. 2010. Deploying functional grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2008. Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa. 2009a. Evaluative patterns in the official discourse of human rights in Chile: Giving value to the past and building historical memories in society. Delta 251 (Special issue). 609–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Solidaridad ideológica en el discurso de la historia: Tensión entre orientaciones monoglósicas y heteroglósicas. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística 42(70). 219–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 457–472. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2019. Events and processes in the discourse of history: Disciplinary history and classroom interaction. In J. R. Martin, Karl Maton & Y. J. Doran (eds.), Understanding academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory, 177–207. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. El sistema de compromiso en español escrito: Dialogicidad en el campo del discurso de la historia. Boletín de Filología, Anejo 3(2). 799–819.Google Scholar
. in press. What to remember, what to teach: Human rights violations in Chile’s recent past and the pedagogical discourse of History. ( Series Text and Social Context ). London: Equinox. ISBN: 9781781798690.
Oteíza, Teresa, Claudia Castro & Claudio Pinuer. 2021. Graduating political crisis and violence in the discourse of History: The role of Spanish suffixes. Discourse Studies 23(3). 296–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa & Claudio Pinuer. 2013. Valorative prosody and the symbolic construction of time in historical recent national discourses. Discourse Studies 15(1). 43–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. El sistema de valoraciÓn como herramienta teórico-metodológica para el estudio social e ideológico del discurso. Logos 29(2). 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Potencial de recursos de gradación para crear significados valorativos en el discurso escrito de la historia. Nueva Revista del Pacífico 761. 223–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinuer, Claudio & Teresa Oteíza. 2015. Los adverbios en –mente como factor de valoración en el discurso de la historia. VERBA, Anuario Galego de Filología 421. 99–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinuer, Claudio, Teresa Oteíza & Marco Contreras. 2021. Logogénesis evaluativa de los adverbios en -mente en discurso histórico de Chile. RLA 59 (2). 81–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, Beatriz. 2015. La cláusula como movimiento interactivo: Una perspectiva semántico-discursiva de la gramática interpersonal del español. D.E.L.T.A 31(1). 261–301.Google Scholar
. 2018. Negotiating interpersonal meanings: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language 25 (1). 135–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Interpersonal grammar in Spanish. In J. R. Martin, Beatriz Quiroz & Giacomo Figueredo (eds.), Interpersonal grammar. Systemic functional linguistic theory and description, 34–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, María Teresa. 2003. La gramática de los adverbios en -mente o cómo expresar maneras, opiniones y actitudes a través de la lengua. Madrid: Ediciones UAM.Google Scholar
Vian, Orlando. 2008. Appraisal system in Brazilian Portuguese: Resources for graduation. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 291. 825–9.Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23(2). 259–284.Google Scholar
2010. Taking Bakhtin seriously: Dialogic effects in written, mass communicative discourse. Japanese Journal of Pragmatics 121. 37–53.Google Scholar
White, Peter. 2012. Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media 6(1). 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 2021. Alignment, persuasiveness and the putative reader in opinion writing. Language, Context and Text: The social semiotics forum 3(2). 247–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele & J. R. Martin. 2018. Conference design: Genre and macro-genre. In Michele Zappavigna & J. R. Martin. Discourse and diversionary justice: An analysis of youth justice conferencing, 49–125. Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala, José Manuel. 2008. Los mapuches del siglo XVIII. Dinámica interétnica y estrategias de resistencia. Temuco: Universidad Católica de Temuco.Google Scholar