Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.193–242

Our last Luciferian pact?

The grammatical construction of the “self” and some implications for discourse in the human sciences

| Macquarie University, Australia
The paper argues for a semiotic – in fact, a grammatical – origin to a profound dimension of the human psyche: William James (1890, 1920[1892]) observed how there were far reaching effects from what he characterised as the “duplex self”. This ME/I relation requires cohesion, or co-ordination, much as first suggested by Hughlings Jackson and Théodule Ribot in the mid nineteenth century. The analysis of grammatical equations (identifying clauses) by the functional linguist M. A. K. Halliday can be called upon to show how many important relationships are enfolded in the apparently simple syntax of BE, and of some other cognate verbs. Through detailed exemplification, the paper shows how a double narrative of the “self” is an inevitable consequence of the first person taking on different combinations of grammatical address. This semiotic aspect of the psyche is also discussed in relation to bilaterian or “doubles” in a number of human sciences.
Keywords: grammatical constructions, verb BE, duplex self, doubles, innovative gemination, semantic variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cultural context: The semiotic motif of the “double”
    • 2.1Construing identity: The necessity of referring to context of situation
    • 2.2Semantic construction through verbal equatives
  • 3.The verb “BE” and its lexicogrammatical synonyms
  • 4.The verb BE and intensive, relational processes in Halliday’s description
  • 5.Returning to cultural contexts of the “double”: Disciplinary ramifications of “represents”
  • References
Published online: 26 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00046.but
References (137)
References
Allan, Keith. 2010. The Western classical tradition in linguistics (2nd edition). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, Guido & Antoni Valentini. 2009. Quantum theory at the crossroads. Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
. 1980. Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Glasgow: Fontana.Google Scholar
. 1982. Difference, double description and the interactive designation of the self. In Allan F. Hanson (ed.), Studies in symbolism and cultural communication, 3–8. Kansas: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Bohm, David. 1980. Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Butt, David G. 1988a. Ideational meaning and the existential fabric of a poem. In Robin P. Fawcett & David Young (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics: Theory and application, 174–218. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1988b. Randomness, order and the latent patterning of text. In David Birch & L. Michael O’Toole (eds.), Functions of style, 4–97. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1989[1985]. Talking and thinking: The patterns of behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Firth, Halliday and the development of systemic functional theory. In Sylvain Auroux, E. F. Konrad Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences. New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1806–1838.Google Scholar
2008. The robustness of realizational systems. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 59–83. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2015. The ‘history of ideas’ and Halliday’s natural science of meaning. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to M.A.K. Halliday, 17–61. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2019. Firth and the origins of systemic functional linguistics: Process, pragma, and polysystem. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 11–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, David G., Alison Moore & Kathryn Tuckwell. 2013. The teleological illusion and linguistic ‘drift’: Choice and purpose in semantic evolution. In Lise Fontaine, Gerard O’Grady & Tom Bartlett (ed.), Choice in language, 37–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffarel, Alice, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. Language typology. A functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, David C. 1992. Uncertainty. The life and science of Werner Heisenberg. New York: W.H. Freeman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cléirigh, Chris. 1998. A selectionist model of the genesis of phonic texture: Systemic phonology and universal Darwinism. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.
. 2013. Towards a linguistic science of sciences. [URL]
Cloran, Carmel. 1989. Learning through language: The social construction of gender. In Ruqaiya Hasan & J. R. Martin (eds.), Learning through language: Learning language, learning culture. Meaning and choice in languages: Studies for Michael Halliday, 111–151. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jack & Ian Stewart. 1995. The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2017. The story of verb BE: A bird’s eye view of the English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, Michael. 2010. An introduction to the grammar of Old English: A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2012. Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 2011[1859]. On the origin of species (The illustrated edition). New York: The Sterling Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul & Niels H. Gregersen. 2010. (eds.). Information and the nature of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deacon, Terrence. 2012. Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. London & New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislaus. 2014. Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 1995. The evolution of human inventiveness. In Michael P. Murphy & Luke A. J. O’Neill (eds.), What is life? The next fifty years. Speculations on the future of biology, 41–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Collapse: How societies choose to fail or survive. Camberwell, Victoria: Penguin.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. 1988. Topobiology: An introduction to molecular embryology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
1992. Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2006. Second nature: Brain science and human knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. & Guilio Tononi. 2000. A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. & Joseph A. Gally. 2001. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 98(24). 13763–13768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1988. Structure and style in Javanese: A semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 32 1. 429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabre d’Olivet, Antoine. 2011[1921]. The Hebraic tongue restored. Translated by Nayán L. Redfield. New York & London: G. P. Pitman’s Sons.Google Scholar
Favareau, Donald, (ed.). 2010. Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Todd E. & Jon M. Mallatt. 2016. The ancient origins of consciousness: How the brain created experience. Cambridge Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman Barrett, Lisa. 2017. How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. London: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957[1950]. Personality and language in society. In John R. Firth, Papers in linguistics 1934–1951, 177–89. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
García, Adolfo M. & Augustin Ibáñez (eds.). 2021. The Routledge handbook of semiosis and the brain. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2014. Philosophy of biology. (Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy). Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Elkhonon. 2001. The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Angus C. 1972. ‘Being’ in linguistics and philosophy. In John W. M. Verhaar (ed.), The verb ‘BE’ and its synonyms: volume 5, 225–233. Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Susan. 2008. ID: The quest for identity in the 21st century. London: Sceptre.Google Scholar
. 2011. You and me: The neuroscience of identity. London: Notting Hill Editions.Google Scholar
Gregory, Richard. 1997. Mirrors in the mind. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2002a[1977]. Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In M. A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 9 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 23–84. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2002b[1988]. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In M. A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, 291–322. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2003a[1972]. Towards a sociological semantics. In M. A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 323–354. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2003b[1995]. On language in relation to the evolution of human consciousness. In M. A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 390–432. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004a. On grammar as the driving force from primary to higher-order consciousness. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 15–44. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004b[1998]. Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. In M. A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 49–10. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005[1966–1968]. Notes on transitivity and theme. In M. A. K. Halliday, Studies in English language, volume 7 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 5–153. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2017[2005]. On matter and meaning: The two realms of human experience. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Halliday in the 21st century, 191–214. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. with Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Jonathan J. Webster. 2014. Text linguistics: The how and why of meaning. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2005[1973]. Code, register and social dialect. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Language, society and consciousness, volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 160–193. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2009a[1990]. [originally co-authored with Carmel Cloran]. A sociolinguistic interpretation of everyday talk between mothers and children. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 75–118. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2009b[1992]. Rationality in everyday talk: From process to system. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 305–352. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster: London: EquinoxGoogle Scholar
. 2009c[1992]. Meaning in sociolinguistic theory. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 271–347. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2015[1984]. Ways of saying; ways of meaning (2nd edition). Edited by Carmel Cloran, David G. Butt & Geoff Williams. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2019[1972]. The verb ‘be’ in Urdu. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Describing language: Form and function, volume 5 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 275–308. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster & Carmel Cloran. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner. 1958. Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hobson, Robert. 1985. Forms of feeling: The heart of psychotherapy. Hove & New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2010. Semiotic freedom: An emerging force. In Paul Davies & Niels H. Gregersen (eds.), Information and the nature of reality: From physics to metaphysics, 185–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1973. Main trends in the science of language. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The principles of psychology: volume 1. New York: Dover Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1904. Does ‘consciousness’ exist? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Method 11. 477–491. Accessed through: Classics in the history of psychology. Christopher D. Green. York University, Ontario. [URL]. DOI logo
. 1920 [1892]. Psychology: Briefer course. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Janet, Pierre. 1924. Principles of psychotherapy. London: George Allen and Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda. 2003. On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Brian Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 1–180. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 2009. Essays on being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kandel, Eric R. 2005. Psychiatry, psychoanalysis, and the new biology of mind. Washington D.C. & London: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
2006. In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Kappagoda, Astika K. 2004. Semiosis as the sixth sense: Theorising the unperceived in Ancient Greek. PhD dissertation. Macquarie University, Australia.
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar. 2012. The pragmatic principles of agreement in Bajjika verb. Journal of Pragmatics 441. 1668–1687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter. 1966[1956]. Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. Cleveland & New York: Meridian Books World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. 2000. Shakespeare’s language. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. The age of Shakespeare. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Otto. 2002[1957]. The language of the Third Reich. LTI lingua tertii imperii. A philologist’s notebook. Translated by Martin Brady. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Korner, Anthony. 2021. Communicative exchange, psychotherapy and the resonant self: Roads to realization. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1995. Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 1993. Biology as ideology: The doctrine of DNA. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 2000. The triple helix: Gene, organism and environment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1966. Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002. The ambitions of curiosity: Understanding the world in ancient Greece and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, Andrew & Charles R. Peters. 1999. Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle. 2019. War and its ideologies: A social semiotic theory and description. Heidelburg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle & David G. Butt. 2021. Neurosemiotics and ideology: A linguistic view. In Adolfo M. García & Augustin Ibáñez (eds.), The Routledge handbook of semiosis and the brain, 294–309. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luria, Alexander R. 1979. The Making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Malloch, Stephen & Colwyn Trevarthen. 2009. (eds.). Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter P. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publisher.Google Scholar
2004. The evolution of language: A systemic functional view of phylogenetic phases. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 45–90. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, Iain. 2009. The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the western world. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Meares, Russell. 1999. The contribution of Hughlings Jackson to an understanding of dissociation. American Journal of Psychiatry 156(12). 1850–1855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The metaphor of play: Origin and breakdown of personal being (3rd edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A dissociation model of borderline personality disorder. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Meares, Russell, Nic Bendit, Joan Haliburn, Anthony Korner, Dawn Mears & David Butt. 2012. Borderline personality disorder and the Conversational Model: A clinician’s manual. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Meares, Russell & Cécile Barral. 2019. The holistic project of Pierre Janet: part 1: Disintegration or désagrégation. In Guiseppe Craparo, Francescu Ortu & Onno van der Hart (eds.), Rediscovering Pierre Janet: Trauma, dissociation, and a new context for psychoanalysis, 106–115. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merzenich, Mike. 2009. Growing evidence of brain plasticity. [URL]
Mitchell, Terence F. 1975[1957]. The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hesperis 441. 31–71. Reprinted in Terence F. Mitchell, Principles of Neo-Firthian Linguistics, 167–200. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Monod, Jacques. 1971. Chance and necessity: Essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Painter, Claire. 2004. The ‘interpersonal first’ principle in child language development. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 137–157. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jan & Lucy Biven. 2012. The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. London & New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Porges, Stephen W. 2011. The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. London & New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard v. O. 1963[1953]. On what there is. In Willard v. O. Quine, From a logical point of view: Logico-philosophical essays, 1–19. New York: Harper & Rowe.Google Scholar
Roochnik, David. 1996. Of art and wisdom: Plato’s understanding of techne. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblueth Arturo, Norbert Wiener, & Julian Bigelow. 1943. Behaviour, purpose and teleology, Philosophy of Science X1. 18–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York & London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959[1916]. Course in general linguistics. Translated by Wayne Baskin. London: Peter Owen Ltd.Google Scholar
Shapiro, James A. 2011. Evolution: A view from the 21st century. New Jersey: FT Press Science.Google Scholar
Snell, Bruno. 1960[1953]. The discovery of mind: The Greek origins of European thought. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Solms, Mark. 2021. The hidden spring: A journey to the source of consciousness. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Tan, Ai Hui. 1987. The meaning of ‘structure’ in methods of analysing discourse. B.A. Hons. thesis. National University of Singapore.
Thibault, Paul J. 1996. Re-reading Saussure: The dynamics of signs in social life. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul. 2004a. Brain, mind, and the signifying body: An ecosocial semiotic theory. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Agency and consciousness in discourse: Self-other dynamics as a complex system. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul. 1977. The courage to be. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1972. Human understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Margaret Bullowa (ed.), Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication, 321–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. 1925. The philosophy of ‘as if’: A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Van Der Kolk, Bessel. 2014. The body keeps the score: Mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert J. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev. 1986[1934]. Thought and language. Edited by Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waddington, Conrad H. 1977. Tools for thought. Frogmore: Paladin.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, thought and reality. Edited by John C. Carroll. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff. 1995. Joint book-reading and literacy pedagogy: A socio-semantic examination. Unpublished Phd dissertation, Macquarie University.
Williams, Geoff & Lukin, Annabelle G. 2004. (eds.). The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wittengstein, Ludwig. 1958[1953]. Philosophical investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Butt, David G., Alison R. Moore, Caroline Henderson-Brooks & Kristin Khoo
2024. Grammar, cohesion and the co-ordination of the “self” in a current psychotherapeutic technique. Journal of World Languages 10:1 ► pp. 102 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.