Cover not available
Article published In:
Moving towards Peace, Compassion and Empathy through Semiotic Enquiry: Special issue of the Journal Language, Context and Text 6:1 (2024)
Edited by Elizabeth A. Thomson, Awni Etaywe, Ingrid Wijeyewardene and Penny Wheeler
[Language, Context and Text 6:1] 2024
► pp. 2–26

Moving towards peace, compassion and empathy through semiotic enquiry

ORCID logo | Charles Darwin University, Australia
ORCID logo | University of Wollongong, Australia
ORCID logo | University of New England, Australia
In our interconnected world, exposure to hate, fear, violence and adversarial communication is commonplace. Yet, this exposure underscores the urgent need for a more just, peaceful, and inclusive society. While research stresses the importance of nurturing peace, compassion and empathy for enhanced well-being and social justice, these three terms are rarely discussed at length in linguistics and communication studies. Little systematic work explores how language and semiotic resources actualise these ideals across contexts. This special issue, grounded in systemic functional linguistics, addresses this gap. It aims to contribute to a more just world, promote non-violent efforts for social justice, and lay the foundation for future research on the semiotics of peace, compassion and empathy. This paper outlines key definitions and contributions.
Keywords: peace, compassion, empathy, semiotics, systemic functional linguistics, multimodality, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, digital communication, morality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Defining “peace”, “compassion” and “empathy” in the special issue
    • Macquarie dictionary (2nd edition)
  • 3.Overview of the articles in the special issue
  • 4.Final remarks
  • References
Published online: 20 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00063.eta
References (63)
References
Bandura, Albert. 2016. Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Tom. 2012. Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Positive discourse analysis. In John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, 133–147. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie & Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1987. The role of linguistics in peace and conflict studies. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S 10(1). 76–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connors, Joanie. 2016. Peace studies glossary. Global campaign for peace education. [URL] (22 August 2022)
Curtin, Deane. 2022. Compassion and being human. In Carol J. Adams & Lori Gruen (eds.), Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the earth, 69–87. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dowling, Trisha. 2018. Compassion does not fatigue! The Canadian Veterinary Journal 59(7). 749–750. [URL]
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna. 2023. The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, R. Brian. 2008. Ten points on war. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology 52(2). 32–49. [URL]. DOI logo
Fourie, Pieter Jacobus. 2012. Peace journalism as ideology or peace journalism as a semiotic act of world and life view? Communicare 311(Special Edition). 1–22.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Patricia. 2007. English for peace: Toward a framework of peace sociolinguistics. World Englishes 26(1). 72–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galtung, Johan. 1969. Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research 6(3). 167–191. [URL]. DOI logo
Gomes de Matos, Francisco. 2000. Harmonizing and humanizing political discourse: The contribution of peace linguistics. Peace and Conflict Studies: Journal of Peace Psychology 6(4). 339–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Peace linguistics for language teachers. DELTA. 30(2). 415–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruen, Lori. 2015. Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1985. Systemic background. In James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse, vol. 11, 1–15. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
2002. Linguistic studies of text and discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008. Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 7–23. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context, and text. Burwood: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hanh, Thich Nhat. 2008[2003]. Spiritual reflections on war and peace: A talk by Thich Nhat Hanh – Peace Forum, March 19, 2003. Human Architecture: Journal of Sociology of Self-Knowledge 6(3). 7–14.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 2012. Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In Jaan Valsiner (ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology, 191–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Ian M. 2004. Peace education theory. Journal of peace education 1(1). 6–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Adam. 2013. War, discourse, and peace. In Adam Hodges (ed.), Discourses of war and peace, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höijer, Brigitta. 2003. The discourse of global compassion and the media. Nordicom Review 24(2). 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höijer, Birgitta. 2004. The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture & Society 26(4). 513–531.Google Scholar
Hughes, Jessica. 2018. Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis. Review of Communication 18(3). 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janks, Hilary & Roz Ivanič. 1992. CLA and emancipatory discourse. In Norman Fairclough (ed.), Critical language awareness, 305–331. Abingdon and New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2000. Design and social transformation: New theories of meaning. In Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, 153–161. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Frans. 2012. The role of TESOL in educating for peace. Journal of Peace Education 9(1). 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T. & Charles Short. 1879. A Latin dictionary founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin dictionary revised and rewritten. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Perseus Digital Library. [URL] (15 October, 2023).
Macquarie Dictionary (2nd edition). 1996. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2012[2000]. Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In J. R. Martin, CDA/PDA, volume 6 in the collected works of J.R. Martin, 158–184. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Google Scholar
2012[2004]. Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. In J. R. Martin, CDA/PDA, volume 6 in the collected works of J.R. Martin, 278–298. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Google Scholar
2012. CDA/PDA, volume 6 in the collected works of J.R. Martin. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Pam Peters. 1985. On the analysis of exposition. In Ruqaiya Hasan (ed.), Discourse on discourse: Workshop reports from the Macquarie Workshop on Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (Occasional Papers 7). 61–92. [reprinted in Text Analysis 2012. 6–45]Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2012. Systemic functional linguistics and appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. DELTA. Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 28(Especial). 435–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhananda, Swami. 2018. What does SHANTI mean. [URL] (16 June, 2023)
Oxford, Rebecca L. 2013. The language of peace: Communicating to create harmony. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition). 1989. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Peace23. [URL] (7 October, 2023)
Piasecky, Melissa. 2003. Clinical communication handbook. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marshall. 2015. Nonviolent communication: A language of life (3rd edition). Encinitas: Puddle Dancer Press.Google Scholar
Rothbart, Daniel & Susan Allen. 2019. Building peace through systemic compassion. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 361. 373–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapio, Antonella & Adriano Zamperini. 2007. Peace psychology: Theory and practice. In Charles Webel & Johan Galtung (eds.), Handbook of peace and conflict studies, 265–278. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidsberger, Florian & Henriette Löffler-Stastka. 2018. Empathy is proprioceptive: The bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education. BMC Medical Education 18(1). 69–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semiotics of Peace, Compassion and Empathy SIG. n.d. Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Association [URL] (1 October 2023).
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (3rd edition). 1992. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Standish, Katerina, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo, & Rachel Rafferty. 2021. Defining the platform of positive peace. In Katerina Standish, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo, & Rachel Rafferty (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of positive peace, 3–24. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trester, Anna Marie. 2013. Performing peace: The framing of silence in a Quaker vigil. In Adam Hodges (ed.), Discourses of war and peace, 225–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langenhove, Luk. 2017. Varieties of moral orders and the dual structure of society: A perspective from positioning theory. Frontiers in Sociology, 21(2017). 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Olivia. 2012. The language of clinical empathy: Modelling affiliation in doctor-patient communication. The University of Sydney, Australia: BA (Hons.) dissertation. The University of Sydney, Australia.
Webel, Charles & Johan Galtung (eds.). 2007. Handbook of peace and conflict studies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenden, Anita L. 2007. Educating for a critically literate civil society: Incorporating the linguistic perspective into peace education. Journal of Peace Education 4(2). 163–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wescott, Roger W. 1990. Reflections on the etymology of some words for “peace”. International Journal on World Peace 7(3). 94–97. [URL]
Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2009. Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd edition). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Zayas, Alfred de. 20 February, 2015. Social justice fosters peace, peace enables social justice. [URL] (6 October 2023).