Cover not available
Article In:
The Social Semiotic Forum: Special issue of the Journal Language, Context and Text 6:1 (2024)
Edited by Elizabeth A. Thomson, Awni Etaywe, Ingrid Wijeyewardene and Penny Wheeler
[Language, Context and Text 6:1] 2024
► pp. 27–59
peace

Constructing resistance in the quest for social justice

A study of a fracturing in Thai hegemony

ORCID logo | University of New England , Australia

This study adopts the concept of “positive peace” and draws on critical discourse studies to investigate the texts of two Thai activists responding to the 2006 coup d’état and subsequent events in Thailand. The study analyses the texts from a systemic functional linguistic (SFL) perspective to show how the first text challenges the legitimacy of the coup, and how the second text reflects a widening of the cracks then appearing in Thai royalist hegemony. In particular, the study compares the construal of one social actor in the first text published in 2007 with that in the speech of the second activist three years later, highlighting how the meaning of a key word evolved from one of oppression to one of pride.

Keywords: peace activism, resistance, Thai coup, systemic functional linguistics, positive discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Context and data
    • 3.1Thai socio-political context, 2006–2010
  • 4.Pitch
    • 4.1 Phrai – subject, commoner, peasant
    • 4.2The challenge
    • 4.3 engagement
    • 4.4 agency
  • 5.Natthawut
    • 5.1 Phrai-Ammart – commoner-aristocrat
    • 5.2Phasing
    • 5.3 engagement
    • 5.4 agency
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Bartlett, Tom
2012 Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Positive discourse analysis. In John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson, The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, 133–147. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James
2013 Translating Thailand’s protests: An analysis of Red Shirt rhetoric. ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 6(1). 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connors, James
2016 Peace studies glossary. Global Campaign for Peace Education. [URL] (1 September, 2022.)
Connors, Michael K. & Kevin Hewison
2008 Introduction: Thailand and the “good coup”. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1). 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahroong, Srikhao
2554[2011] สุภาพบุรุษไพร่ ณัฐวุฒิ ใสเกื้อ [Gentleman Phrai Natthawut Saikua]. Bangkok: Matichon.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Federico
2020 Understanding Thailand’s domestic political conflict: Democracy, social identity, and the “struggle for recognition”. In Pavin Chachavalpongpun (ed.), Coup, king, crisis: A critical interregnum in Thailand (Monograph 68), 31–55. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Patricia
2007 English for peace: Toward a framework of Peace Sociolinguistics. World Englishes 26(1). 72–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galtung, Johan
1969 Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research 6(3). 167–191. [URL]. DOI logo
Glassman, Jim
2011 Cracking hegemony in Thailand: Gramsci, Bourdieu and the dialectics of rebellion. Journal of Contemporary Asia 41(1). 25–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michael & Karen Malcolm
1981 Generic situation and discourse phase. [Mimeo]. Applied Linguistics Research Working Group, Glendon College of York University. Toronto.Google Scholar
Haberkorn, Tyrell
2010 Thailand’s political transformation. CETRI. [URL] (27 July, 2023)
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985 Systemic background. In James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse, vol. 11, 1–15. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985 Linguistics, language, and verbal art. Burwood, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin
2013 Weber, Marx and contemporary Thailand. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and National Studies of Southeast Asia 11. 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Entrenching authoritarianism in Thailand. East Asia Forum. [URL] (30 July, 2023.)
Hewison, Kevin & Kengkij Kitirianglarp
2010 “Thai-style democracy”: The royalist struggle for Thailand’s politics. In Søren Ivarsson & Lotte Isager (eds.), Saying the unsayable: Monarchy and democracy in Thailand, 179–202. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Hughes, Jessica M. F.
2018 Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis. Review of Communication 181. 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom
2005 A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles
2014 Finding their voice: Northeastern villagers and the Thai state. Chiangmai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Khorapin, Phuaphansawat
2017 “My eyes are open but my lips are whispering”: Linguistic and symbolic forms of resistance in Thailand during 2006–2016. University of Massachusetts Amherst: Doctoral Dissertation.
2018 Anti-royalism in Thailand since 2006: Ideological shifts and resistance. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48(3). 363–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 The anti-royalist possibility: Thailand’s 2020 student movement. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. [URL] (19 January, 2023)
Kress, Gunther
2000 Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In Bill Cope & Mary Kalantzis (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, 153–161. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Joseph
2021 Pragmatic nonviolence and positive peace. In Katrina Standish, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo & Rachel Rafferty (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of positive peace, 3–24. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Karen
2005 What communication linguistics has to offer genre and register research. Folia Linguistica, XXXIX/1–21, 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
2004 Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 491. 179–202.Google Scholar
2007 Comment. World Englishes 26(1). 84–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 [2000] Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In J. R. Martin, CDA/PDA, volume 6 in the collected works of J.R. Martin, 158–184. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2007 Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter White
2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
2012 Systemic functional linguistics and appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. D.E.L.T.A. Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 28(Especial). 435–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit & Chris Baker
2008 Thaksin’s populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1). 62–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patpong, Pattama
2006 A systemic functional interpretation of Thai grammar: An exploration of Thai narrative discourse. PhD dissertation. Macquarie University, Australia.
Phrai
2554[2011] พจนานุกรม ฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน [ Royal Institute Dictionary ]. [URL] (26 July, 2023)
Pitch Pongsawat
2550[2007] การรัฐประหาร 19 กันยา 2549 คือการทำให้พลเมืองกลายเป็นไพร่ [The coup of 19 September 2549 turned citizens into subjects]. ฟ้าเดียวกัน [Same Sky], Special Edition. 58–88.Google Scholar
Standish, Katrina, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo & Rachel Rafferty
2021 Defining the platform of positive peace. In Katrina Standish, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo & Rachel Rafferty (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of positive peace, 3–24. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streckfuss, David
2011 Truth on trial in Thailand: Defamation, treason, and lèse majesté. Abington: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thongchai, Winichakul
2008 Toppling democracy. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1). 11–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Andrew
2008 The rural constitution and the everyday politics of elections in Northern Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1). 84–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijeyewardene, Ingrid
2017 Rhetorical and represented agency in Thai political science texts on the 2006 coup d’état. PhD dissertation. University of New England, Australia.
2019 Examining agency in Thai argumentative political science texts. In Kumaran Rajandran & Shakila Abdul Manan (eds.), Discourses of Southeast Asia: A social semiotic perspective, 45–67. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer
2009 Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd edition), 1–33. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar