Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 3:2 (2021) ► pp.247273
References (33)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 1998. Negation, ‘presupposition’ and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34 (2). 309–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, Frances. & James R. Martin. 1997. Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Delogu, Francesca. 2009. Presupposition. In Jef Vershueren & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Key notions for pragmatics, 195–207. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Don, Alexanne. 2017. Stance-taking and the construal of textual persona in written contexts: Social contact revisited. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 13 (1–2). 70–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Walker. 1950. Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers. College English 11 (5). 164–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1999. Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not’. In Ahmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Appliable linguistics, 267–306. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez & Peter R. R. White. 1994. Media literacy. Sydney, New South Wales: Sydney, Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth M. 1975. Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunter. 1985. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary & James R. Martin. 2003. Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation (special edition of Text, Issue 23, v.2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and construction of discourse, 142–175. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2008. Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London & New York: Palgrave/Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald. 1980. Introduction to the study of the narratee. In Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism, 7–25. Baltimore: JHU John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolf. 2014. Implied reader. In Peter Hühn, Jan Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), Handbook of narratology, 301–309. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter R. R. White & Karin Aijmer. 2007. Presupposition and ‘taking for granted’ in mass communicated political argument. In Anita Fetzer & Gerda E. Lauerbach (eds.), Political discourse in the media, 31–74. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2012. Intersubjectivity in newspaper editorials: Construing the reader-in-the-text. English Text Construction 5 (1). 77–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 1998. Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales.Google Scholar
2000. Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Working with dialogue, 67–80. Berlin: Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Appraisal-the language of evaluation and stance. In Jef Vershueren, Jan-Ola Östman & Jan Blommaert (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23 (3). 259–284.Google Scholar
2020a. Attitudinal alignments in journalistic commentary and social-media argumentation: The construction of values-based group identities in the online comments of newspaper readers. In Michele Zappavigna & Shoshana Dreyfus (eds.), Discourses of hope and reconciliation: On J. R. Martin’s contribution to systemic functional linguistics, 21–49. London & Oxford: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b. The putative reader in mass media persuasion – stance, argumentation and ideology. Discourse & Communication 14 (4). 404–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. Textual anticipation and the putative reader in persuasive discourse. Journal of Foreign Languages 44 (1). 1–20.Google Scholar
White, Peter. R. R. & Motoki Sano. 2006. Dialogistic positions and anticipated audiences-a framework for stylistic comparisons. In Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast, 191–214. Frankfurt: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation. Discourse & Communication 8 (2). 209–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Ambient affiliation and Brexit. In Veronkia Koller, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit, 85–113. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Poucke, Margo Van
2024. ‘Do not parade your ignorance’: Negation as a power tool of toxic geek masculinity. SN Social Sciences 4:2 DOI logo
Xu, Qingxin & Xiaoyan Xiao
2024. Deaf translator’s visibility in political discourse: a dialogic positioning perspective. Perspectives 32:2  pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Oteíza, Teresa
2023. Graduating points of view in Spanish written language. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiawei & Zhiying Xin
2023. A novel multi-dimensional analysis of reply, response and rejoinder articles: When discipline meets time. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 65  pp. 101286 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.