Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 3:2 (2021) ► pp.247273
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981The dialogic imagination. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C.
1961The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
1998Negation, ‘presupposition’ and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34 (2). 309–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, Frances. & James R. Martin
1997Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Delogu, Francesca
2009Presupposition. In Jef Vershueren & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Key notions for pragmatics, 195–207. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Don, Alexanne
2017Stance-taking and the construal of textual persona in written contexts: Social contact revisited. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 13 (1–2). 70–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Walker
1950Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers. College English 11 (5). 164–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1989Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1999Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010The meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not’. In Ahmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Appliable linguistics, 267–306. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez & Peter R. R. White
1994Media literacy. Sydney, New South Wales: Sydney, Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth M.
1975Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunter
1985Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary & James R. Martin
2003 Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation (special edition of Text, Issue 23, v.2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
2000Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and construction of discourse, 142–175. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London & New York: Palgrave/Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald
1980Introduction to the study of the narratee. In Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism, 7–25. Baltimore: JHU John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolf
2014Implied reader. In Peter Hühn, Jan Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), Handbook of narratology, 301–309. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter R. R. White & Karin Aijmer
2007Presupposition and ‘taking for granted’ in mass communicated political argument. In Anita Fetzer & Gerda E. Lauerbach (eds.), Political discourse in the media, 31–74. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2012Intersubjectivity in newspaper editorials: Construing the reader-in-the-text. English Text Construction 5 (1). 77–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E.
2003The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
1998Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales.Google Scholar
2000Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Working with dialogue, 67–80. Berlin: Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Appraisal-the language of evaluation and stance. In Jef Vershueren, Jan-Ola Östman & Jan Blommaert (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23 (3). 259–284.Google Scholar
2020aAttitudinal alignments in journalistic commentary and social-media argumentation: The construction of values-based group identities in the online comments of newspaper readers. In Michele Zappavigna & Shoshana Dreyfus (eds.), Discourses of hope and reconciliation: On J. R. Martin’s contribution to systemic functional linguistics, 21–49. London & Oxford: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020bThe putative reader in mass media persuasion – stance, argumentation and ideology. Discourse & Communication 14 (4). 404–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Textual anticipation and the putative reader in persuasive discourse. Journal of Foreign Languages 44 (1). 1–20.Google Scholar
White, Peter. R. R. & Motoki Sano
2006Dialogistic positions and anticipated audiences-a framework for stylistic comparisons. In Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast, 191–214. Frankfurt: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2014Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation. Discourse & Communication 8 (2). 209–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Ambient affiliation and Brexit. In Veronkia Koller, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit, 85–113. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar