Cover not available
Article published In:
Manufacturing Knowledge
Edited by Alfonso Del Percio and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Language, Culture and Society 5:2] 2023
► pp. 167–181

(Im)possible change

Criticality and constraints in the infrastructures of the academic knowledge economy

| Stockholm University
| Dublin City University
| Prince of Songkla University
This article examines three sets of infrastructures that give shape to the academic knowledge economy, namely: institutional infrastructures (universities and conferences); gate-keeping infrastructures (journals and publishers); and validation infrastructures (competitive assessments of individuals and institutions). We analyse the tensed interplay between critical perspectives in applied linguistics and the influence of academic neoliberalism. We develop our argument in three parts: (1) Academic critique and its emancipatory epistemologies are intertwined with established systems and coexist with mechanisms that perpetuate inequalities. (2) Inequalities in knowledge production reverberate in knowledge dissemination, where the hegemonic role of English as the language of academic publishing reinforces the unequal position of different actors in their academic fields. (3) These inequalities (that originate in institutional and gate-keeping infrastructures) extend to the validation of knowledge, which is entrenched in the audit culture that pervades academia and further reinforces neoliberal competitive dynamics. We conclude by reflecting on the possibilities for change at these three levels.
Keywords: Academic knowledge economy, criticality, inequality, infrastructures, neoliberalism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Institutional infrastructures of knowledge production and academic critique
  • 3.Gate-keeping infrastructures in knowledge production and dissemination
  • 4.Validation infrastructures, precarity and morality in neoliberal academia
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00040.sol
References (46)
References
Albuquerque, A. D. (2021). The institutional basis of anglophone western centrality. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 180–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amano, T., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Borokini, I., Chowdhury, S. & Golivets, M. et al. (2023). The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science. PLoS Biology, 21(7), e3002184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, N. (2019). From the editor: What I have learned in the last four years. American Ethnologist, 46(4), 381–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2021). Forms of capital: General sociology, volume 3: Lectures at the Collège de France 1983–84. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Brankovic, J. (2022). Why rankings appear natural (but aren’t). Business & Society, 61(4), 801–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2022). Language diversity in academic writing: Toward decolonizing academic publishing. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(2), 107–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curcic, D. (2023, June 1). Number of academic papers published per year. Wordsrated. [URL]
De Costa, P. I., Park, J., & Wee, L. (2019). Linguistic entrepreneurship as affective regime: Organizations, audit culture, and second/foreign language education policy. Language Policy, 181, 387–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Figueiredo, E. H. D., & Martinez, J. (2021). The locus of enunciation as a way to confront epistemological racism and decolonize scholarly knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 355–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Percio, A., Baquedano-López, P., Pérez-Milans, M. & Vigouroux, C. (Eds.) (2021). Language, epistemology, and the politics of knowledge production. Language, Culture and Society, 3(2), 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A., & Makoni, S. (Eds.) (2023). From Southern theory to decolonising sociolinguistics: Voices, questions and alternatives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A., Ellece, S. E., Tupas, R., Sabaté-Dalmau, M., Unamuno, V. & Urla, J. (Eds.) (2021). Prefiguring knowledge production in the sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–2681, 1–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality? Language Teaching, 53(2), 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heng Hartse, J., & Kubota, R. (2014). Pluralizing English? Variation in high-stakes academic texts and challenges of copyediting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 241, 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holborow, M. (2013). Applied linguistics in the neoliberal university: Ideological keywords and social agency. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 229–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31 1, 58–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Academic publishing and the attention economy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 641, 101253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hynninen, N., & Kuteeva, M. (2017). “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 301, 53–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerfoot, C., & Hyltenstam, K. (Eds.) (2017). Entangled discourses. South-North orders of visibility. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied linguistics, 36(4), 454–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 474–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 712–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Linking research to transforming the real world: Critical language studies for the next 20 years. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 20(1), 4–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R. (2017). Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 129–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulczycki, E. (2023). The evaluation game: How publication metrics shape scholarly communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. (2021). Hegemonies and inequalities in academia, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, (267–268), 169–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 235–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, S. (2021). Establishing a track record in an age of precarity. In P. Habibie & S. Burgess (Eds.), scholarly publication trajectories of early-career scholars: Insider perspectives (pp. 263–279). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, S., & Leonard, J. (2023). Hidden impacts of precarity on teaching: Effects on student support and feedback on academic writing. Teaching in Higher Education, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meghji, A. (2021). Decolonizing sociology: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2022). The quantified scholar: How research evaluations transformed the British social sciences. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2022). Critical educational linguistics. Educational Linguistics, 1(2), 219–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021, 27 October). Critical applied linguistics. Oxford Bibliographies. [URL]. DOI logo
Phelan, S. (2022). What’s in a name? Political antagonism and critiquing ‘neoliberalism’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 27(2), 148–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2022). What exactly does an editor do? Multilingua, 41(6), 629–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmenk, B., Breidbach, S., & Küster, L. (Eds.). (2018). Sloganization in language education discourse: Conceptual thinking in the age of academic marketization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Souto-Otero, M., & Enders, J. (2017). International students’ and employers’ use of rankings: A cross-national analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 783–810.Google Scholar
Spooner, M. (2020). Technologies of governance in context: Four global windows into neoliberalism and audit culture in higher education. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 743–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. W., & Lehmann, D. (2021). Academic celebrity. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 341, 21–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2016). Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2), 105–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle. The case for Open Access to research and scholarship. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður S., Guðrún Geirsdóttir & Anna Ólafsdóttir
2024. Academics’ dilemmas in addressing challenging societal issues in today’s higher education landscape. Globalisation, Societies and Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heleta, Savo & Pedro Mzileni
2024. Bibliometric Coloniality in South Africa: Critical Review of the Indexes of Accredited Journals. Education as Change 28 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.