Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 8:3 (2018) ► pp.414–438

The facilitator’s communicative actions to construct meetings in a semi-informal educational context

| University of Massachusetts Amherst (USA)
The study examines how interactivity is constructed in the course of multi-person interaction in a semi-informal educational context. The audio-recordings of seven meetings of a female discussion club in Belarus and their transcripts serve as interactional data. The club was organized with a goal of providing a platform for females to engage in intellectual discussions in an informal setting. The study takes the communication design approach and uses discourse analysis. The analysis of the audio recordings and the transcripts is guided by the following question: how the participants’ use of linguistic and interactional resources contributes to the construction of a meeting. The particular attention is paid to the facilitator’s communicative actions to shape interaction and their local context.
Keywords: communication design, communicative actions, discourse analysis, discussions, meetings, semi-informal interaction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Meetings as interactional achievements
  • 3.Communication design
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Framing a meeting
    • 5.2Facilitator’s communicative actions
      • 5.2.1Organizing matters
      • 5.2.2Interaction management
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00024.vas
References (34)
References
Aakhus, Mark. 2003. “Neither Naïve nor Normative Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation”. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 171: 265–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 741:112–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aakhus, Mark and Alena L. Vasilyeva. 2008. “Managing Disagreement Space in Multiparty Deliberation.” In Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 197–214. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte and Jan Svennevig. 2009. “Meeting Talk: Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication 461: 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbour, Joshua B. and Rebecca Gill. 2014. “Designing Communication for the Day-to-Day Safety Oversight of Nuclear Power Plants.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 421: 168–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barske, Tobias. 2009. “Same Token, Different Actions: A Conversation Analytic Study of Social Roles, Embodied Actions, and Ok in German Business Meetings.” Journal of Business Communication 461: 120–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, Laura W. and Anna Wiederhold. 2014. “Discursive Strategies of Civil Disagreement in Public Dialogue Groups.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 421: 285–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boden, Deirdre. 1994. “The Business of Talk. Organizations in Action.” Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Clifton, Jonathan. 2009. “Beyond Taxonomies of Influence: “Doing” Influence and Making Decisions in Management Team Meetings.” Journal of Business Communication 461: 57–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada. 2010. “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 1700–1718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Jesse and Janet H. Chrispeels. 2008. “Us and Them: Conflict, Collaboration, and the Discursive Negotiation of Multishareholder Roles in School District Reform.” Small Group Research 391: 397–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 481: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Tyler R. 2014. “Enhancing Communication Interventions and Evaluations through Communication Design.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 421: 135–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Stephanie Schnurr, and Meredith Marra. 2007. “Leadership and Communication: Discursive Evidence of a Workplace Culture Change.” Discourse and Communication 11: 433–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally and Mark Aakhus. 2014. “Becoming More Reflective about the Role of Design in Communication.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 421: 125–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena. 1996. “Aligning as a Team in Multiparty Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 261: 291–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena and Tuija Nikko. 2009. “Emotions in Organizations: Joint Laughter in Workplace Meetings.” Journal of Business Communication 461: 100–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Mie Femø. 2009. “Interpretive Management in Business Meetings: Understanding Managers’ Interactional Strategies through Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Business Communication 461: 23–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita and Paul Denvir. 2007. “Enacting the Institutional Role of Chairperson in Upper Management Meetings: The Interactional Realization of Provisional Authority.” In Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting, ed. by François Cooren, 31–51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Praet, Ellen Van. 2009. “Staging a Team Performance: A Linguistic Ethnographic Analysis of Weekly Meetings at a British Embassy.” Journal of Business Communication 461: 88–99.Google Scholar
Putnam, Linda L. 2007. “Contradictions in the Metatalk about Feelings.” In Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting, ed. by François Cooren, 95–111. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Robert E. 2007. “The Effect of Interactional Competence on Group Problem Solving.” In Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting, ed. by François Cooren, 163–183. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Helen B. 1989. “Chapter 5. Constructing a Meeting.” In The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities, 115–143. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Steffen Blaschke, François Cooren, Robert D. McPhee, David Seidl, and James R. Taylor. 2014. “The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison.” Management Communication Quarterly 281: 285–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprain, Leah, Martin Carcasson, and Andy J. Merolla. 2014. “Utilizing “on Tap” Experts in Deliberative Forums: Implications for Design.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 421: 150–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James R. and Daniel Robichaud. 2007. “Management as Metaconversation: The Search for Closure.” In Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting, ed. by François Cooren, 5–30. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. Travis, Frederick Steier, and Wit Ostrenko. 2014. “Designing Communication Process for the Design of an Idea Zone at a Science Center.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 421: 208–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2007. “Feeling-Limned Talk: Conduct Ideals in the Steinberg Succession Meeting.” In Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting, ed. by François Cooren, 77–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2015. “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 51: 355–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Confrontation and Collaboration in the Course of the Election Debate.” Language and Dialogue 61: 370–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. “Practices of Topic and Dialogue Activity Management in Dispute Mediation.” Discourse Studies 191: 341–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

van Burgsteden, Lotte, Hedwig te Molder & Geoffrey Raymond
2022. The turn-by-turn unfolding of “dialogue”: Examining participants’ orientations to moments of transformative engagement. Language & Communication 82 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.